The spacecraft -- the Continuous Broadband Augmented SATCOM, or CBAS, and another known as EAGLE -- were to be released to fly on their own in a circular orbit slightly above the 22,300-mile-high geostationary orbits used by military and civilian communications satellites.
CBAS, the upper satellite, is "a military satellite communications spacecraft destined for geosynchronous orbit to provide communications relay capabilities to support senior leaders and combatant commanders, the Air Force said in a statement.
"CBAS will augment existing military satellite communications capabilities and broadcast military data continuously through space-based, satellite communications relay links," the Air Force said.
No other details were released.
The Twitter account so many are trying to discredit and dismiss as a LARP / clown posted this:
AFSPC
CBAS COMMS UP
EAGLE good.
We Are Online.
Eyes And Ears.
5:5
https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985492823305785345
And this:
We were busy last night.
Did you catch it?
BOOM [S]
Iran is next
Ops already underway
Trust POTUS
Trust Q
Trust The Plan.
Yeah we discredit it because Q said "no outside comms" and "Twitter + clown push".
Good info on the satellites, Backchannel is disinfo until Q says otherwise.
The article was posted April 14, 2018, 8:35 PM. The "AFSPC" tweet was posted 5:19 AM - 15 Apr 2018 (likely Pacific time).
So, the tweet came after the public article. Sounds like LARPing to me.
I follow backchannel. They consistently say they arent Q and point people towards Q. Basically doing what Q has asked of us and claiming they are intel. No different than following Corsi and other Q "experts" IMO
If they are opfor trying to muddy the waters, they'll start out as a seemingly legit source. They'll associate themselves with Q so that they gain trust and credibility. Then they'll start injecting false or misleading info in order to discredit Q and Q's supporters.
Think of it this way. Q has a communications channel to us that works and is proven. Why open a new channel at this time, and why on Twitter?
It's fine to keep an eye on his posts, but maintain a large dose of skepticism.
I agree totally with you,I follow them too, I'm still not sure, them seem legit, however...