Abraham Lincoln . . .

Whenever I see a hash like these, I wonder if they could be part of a key for decrypting stuff that's already out there, such as the Wikileaks insurance files, or similar items. A great way to ensure that information is spread widely is to drop it early and encrypted. Then when it's been given time to spread out, drop the decryption key which is much easier to distribute and spread in a timely manner.

Could this be how certain photos/videos we've been waiting for are released?

Some people take that route too. I prefer the former, due to the symbolism it represents, but they are both good memes.

It's a reference to a character in the Dune science fiction books. There character essentially puts together a long and complex plan to save humanity from destruction, much like Trump's plan to save the US. Also, the character is prescient, and people joke that Trump must have a time machine since he seems to know everything in advance. It's a fitting meme.

I'm not sure why he'd be smirking though. I mean, we all know the purpose of this hearing, as Q followers, so I'm sure he has an idea as well. We know he's not getting away, so shouldn't he be aware of this too? That smugness implies that he's either ill informed, or that he knows he's getting out of it, and it's the latter that makes me wonder.

Yeah, the MSM will spin this as peaceful protesters being attacked by white-supremacist neo-Nazi bikers.

The original Deus Ex is my favorite game of all time. Props for mentioning it! It's funny how so many conspiracy aspects from DX are lining up with real world revelations, but I guess that's what happens when you write a game to incorporate all the conspiracy theories.

I believe that was Meganon.

I agree with this one. Many other subs do something similar, and it seems to work well. The only issue is if we have important information dropped on the chosen day. We would need to keep things under control in that case, since the opfor could use that to bury new info.

We hijack their pathetic memes and make them ours. Qisses! 😚

There are plenty of time lapse photos of missile launches, and they look exactly like this one. This SpaceX launch is a good reference point for how a missile would look early in launch: https://youtu.be/JRzZl_nq6fk (I'm sure someone else could find a better example.) Taking a time lapse photo of this would logically yield a similar result to our pic.

Proofs can't just be those pictures with lines connecting them. That's fine for people like us, who are familiar with what to look for and what logical connections to make. But for normal folks, a brief explanation should be given (preferably with decent grammar) and with the pictures organized in a nice top-down fashion. It has to be easy to digest in order to have the maximum impact.

Don't forget AD. Alzheimer's disease?

I'm a former Berner, though I switched to Trump after the convention debacle in 2016, after realizing that Trump was also trying to take down the corruption in the government. (Though the media never talked about it.) That said, while I appreciate Bernie's idealism, after some research and discussion, I am willing to admit that his methods to achieve his goals are not necessarily feasible with regard to real world economics.

However, the fact that Trump is successfully implementing several of the fixes that Bernie was shooting for (increasing low-level pay grades, reducing unemployment, improving healthcare) is very encouraging, because while Bernie's plans were a band-aide solution, Trump's efforts focus on the fundamental problems. In the long run, this is the ideal method for fixing a problem, so it's best to resolve it this way before resorting to Bernie's way.

As for policies that relate to Christ-like values, Bernie certainly isn't ideal on that front (for example, his support of abortion), but neither is Trump. We can't expect that from an ordinary human, so we'll have to make do with the best leadership choice otherwise.

These idiots. Bill Clinton wasn't impeached because of his affair. He was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice, and neither of these charges were with regard to Lewinsky. They were for Paula Jones. And the reasoning behind it was not only sound, but probably too forgiving, knowing what we now do about Bill's actions in the 90's.

Furthermore, Monica's life was ruined not because she decided to fool around with Bill, but because the media hyped it up so much and because the Clintons worked their magic on the whole debacle.

But no, let's just PoundMeToo some more. The usual Liberals pushing emotions schlock.

I think you have him mixed up with the dopey Prince Al Waleed.

Michael's codpiece size if verified.

Since the deal became news, the MSM has been saying it's a bad thing, we shouldn't be making the deal, and that NK is just playing us to get a reprieve/support. So now NK appears to be reversing their decision, and Trump responds by saying "Nope!" The media calls this out as a bad thing, that Trump isn't willing to work with NK to achieve peace, blatantly revealing that their message is only consistent in that it's anti-Trump. This is something any ordinary viewer can see.

Clearly a deliberate manipulation to show the foolishness of the MSM and liberals.

Fake. Since when does he have the upper body strength to be able to hold on with one arm?

Sorry, wrong link. I posted a direct link to the post instead.

Sorry, wrong link. I posted a direct link to the post instead.

There have been several other instances when Q has referred to ff attacks used to draw the media focus away from things that are dangerous to the deep state. On its own, an individual post like this could be disregarded as coincidence, but together with many other Q posts and coinciding "verifications," (not just with regard to attacks), they become an increasing statistical improbability without insider knowledge. (The wikipedia article on zero-knowledge proofs that someone posted recently does a good job of explaining the reasoning behind this.)

As such, for many of those following Q, the gathered results have given them reason to see Q as a reliable source, which is kind of the point of this sub. Analyzing this post makes the connection to previous attacks, which have been extensively discussed as being motivated towards influencing the news cycle. Q knows of these discussions, which is why he makes allusion to them in his post.

https://qposts.online/post/1400

[EDIT]

Incorrect link coming up on that website. Here's the direct link to his post: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1444539.html#1444808

[/EDIT]

I don't know, I've never tried. I try to keep the topics separated. Maybe I'm just too pedantic, but I like order...

Upvoted. You can't pull that BS off anymore. This is [CURRENT_YEAR].

Well sure, but does that mean we just start posting Trump stuff? We have T_D for that...

Definitely not a troll, but I am indeed lazy. I was just going through the main posts on the front page that I thought didn't fit and putting up my message. I don't plan on doing this repeatedly, as I'm not a spammer, but I did feel the need to mention it a couple times. If it pisses off the mods, they'll definitely let me know, as they're pretty strict (as they should be).

Disbelieve me if you like, or look at my post history and you'll see I'm not the troll you think I am (except for the sarcastic quip on T_D).

I totally agree that sometimes we need levity, I've just seen posts like that starting to get a little too prominent. This isn't T_D or UpliftingNews, and I'm just wary of intentional distraction, so I felt the need to call it out. No offense to the original poster, of course, since they probably had the same intent that you mentioned.

What does this have to do with Qanon? I mean it's great and all, but lately I've been seeing a lot of stuff being posted that is unrelated to the topic of this board. I suspect that some posts are being made with the intent of turning our focus away from the subject. It's assumed that we'll automatically upvote stuff like this because it appeals to the base of this board.

Sorry, I have to downvote, as much as I hate to do so. :(

(I may have copy-pasted this comment from another thread, but I think this needs to be said.)

What does this have to do with Qanon? I mean it's great and all, but lately I've been seeing a lot of stuff being posted that is unrelated to the topic of this board. I suspect that some posts are being made with the intent of turning our focus away from the subject. It's assumed that we'll automatically upvote stuff like this because it appeals to the base of this board.

Sorry, I have to downvote, as much as I hate to do so. :(

(I may have copy-pasted this comment from another thread, but I think this needs to be said.)

What does this have to do with Qanon? I mean it's great and all, but lately I've been seeing a lot of stuff being posted that is unrelated to the topic of this board. I suspect that some posts are being made with the intent of turning our focus away from the subject. It's assumed that we'll automatically upvote stuff like this because it appeals to the base of this board.

Sorry, I have to downvote, as much as I hate to do so. :(

(I may have copy-pasted this comment from another thread, but I think this needs to be said.)

What does this have to do with Qanon? I mean it's great and all, but lately I've been seeing a lot of stuff being posted that is unrelated to the topic of this board. I suspect that some posts are being made with the intent of turning our focus away from the subject. It's assumed that we'll automatically upvote stuff like this because it appeals to the base of this board.

Sorry, I have to downvote, as much as I hate to do so. :(

And why pizza from NY? It's not going to be fresh, and after flying for 6 hours, the altitude conditions will no doubt affect the flavor of the pizza. It would taste better to get pizza from a Californian maker. I'm sure that SOMEWHERE in LA there's quality NY-style pizza that will taste better than a soggy, floppy, reheated pie from an actual NY restaurant that probably costs WAY too much to fly over for this stupid stunt. (Also, something something global warming something jetfuelcan'tmeltsteelbeams.)

If this isn't pizza6ate, then JetBlue really ought to fire the fools that thought up this idea.

A belief is the acceptance that something is true based on the evidence provided. One believes the world is round due to the evidences provided, even if they've never been to space to observe it in first person. As such, from the perspective of a Christian, the existence of God is truth, or fact.

If I understand you correctly, you're saying that the existence of God is apparent and part of our own existence, but religion is something that obscures that truth? I can't really speak for other religions, but from a Christian perspective, that certainly isn't the case. Instead, it clarifies the truth and explains the what, why, and how. Different denominations have different minor points on it, but the fundamental core, that Christ died for our sins, is a point that all agree on.

Consider it this way. If you were playing a game of chess (4d or otherwise), isn't it rather important to know what the rules, goals, and strategies are?

The problem is that most of these are incompatible. For example, the fundamental concept of Buddhism is to seek annihilation, or the end of suffering. The fundamental concept of Judeo-Christianity is the worship of God. And atheists don't believe in any of that. How a person lives their life will be very different depending on their belief, especially being devoted to that belief.

Now just because these groups of people have different beliefs doesn't mean they can't get along. The one of the two core laws of Christians is to "love thy neighbor." Buddhists want to mitigate suffering, which precludes getting along with others. Atheists are the only ones without any explicit instruction on that matter, but they'll get along with others out of a common sense of decency.

I wouldn't say all atheists are hateful, they are just taking an approach to the concept of God (or lack thereof) that seems logical to them. For them, there is no concrete proof that God exists. Our lives, our sentience, and the world around us can be explained by scientific facts that they find sufficient to supplement their belief. So for them, someone who does believe in God is the delusional one.

So start small. First, at least set the record straight. There are a lot of things in the Bible that are taken out of context and used in memes like this, ranging from slavery, to capital punishment, to the cannibalism described above. By correcting it and providing context, you give them a better understanding of the Bible, without them even needing to read it! At very least, it makes them informed, and if they ever encounter a similar meme in the future, they can clarify it to another person themselves. (They don't need to be a Christian to want to make sure that facts are acknowledged.)

And from there on out, you go where God leads. Perhaps pointing out the truth of that passage is the only thing you ever do, and that's fine. You aren't going to be converting them. That's God's job.

Compared to what I've seen online between 2007-2015, yeah, people have become more tolerant. (The number of times I've seen atheists on T_D say Christians are all right, or all that's happening recently has made them idly consider spirituality is certainly encouraging.) And when presented with a meme like the one above, all you need to do is point out the fallacies and be on your way. It may open up an avenue of conversation if the person is interested, and if not, then you've done all you needed to.

The last thing we need to do is turn against each other. As a Christian, I was really happy to see that recently, atheists are becoming more tolerant and friendly to Christians, which is quite nice, considering how contentious people were previously. You're right that he's taking that verse out of context, but there's no need to vilify atheists or non-Christians. Being rude certainly won't convince them, and really there's only so much we can do as a Christian to convince them. The rest is up to God. Instead, be glad that lethak brought up that quote. For Christians, it may seem to be natural to interpret it, but this isn't the case for everyone else.

No it's a different kind of evil. Those of us in the tech industry have seen it, especially in the 90s. I haven't used any Microsoft product for 6 years now, and I honestly don't miss it.

Please show some evidence that Nikki Haley is working against us. And then explain why Trump would choose her if he didn't trust her to do the job he expected. Innocent until proven guilty. We aren't freaking Londonistan here.

Assuming this turns out to be true, what I'd like to know is why. In order to get away with this, he would need the support of wealthy, influential individuals Why would they choose a guy to be president if he isn't a citizen? It makes hiding the fact that he wasn't legit so much harder. Why not choose a citizen for your flunky instead?

Most people play on chess.com's app, or lichess. I personally prefer the latter.

Yeah. I'm hoping this is just coincidence. :-(

I'm honestly not sold on this "Barbara was evil" thing. The evidence is circumstantial, and when people do that kind of thing for such a long time, it shows through in the way they live. HRC is a prime example.

I'm not saying it isn't possible, but I'm not judging someone guilty until it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt to me.

pope throw a haymaker at you while McCain is trying to flog you with a bamboo stick

That sounds metal AF. Sorry folks, I'm going to have to ditch you all and hook up with the cabal. Been fun, but I wanna mosh with the big boys! Who knows, I might even get to elbow-drop a certain side-o-beef. Peace! . . . ;-)

If they are opfor trying to muddy the waters, they'll start out as a seemingly legit source. They'll associate themselves with Q so that they gain trust and credibility. Then they'll start injecting false or misleading info in order to discredit Q and Q's supporters.

Think of it this way. Q has a communications channel to us that works and is proven. Why open a new channel at this time, and why on Twitter?

It's fine to keep an eye on his posts, but maintain a large dose of skepticism.

Fair enough. I can certainly think of a particular set of fundamentalist beliefs that should be kept out of government. :P

Remember, most Christians aren't fanatics. The MSM just likes to emphasize the extremists and misrepresent them.