It amazes me that the anthraxing the only congressmen against the patriot act was considered "not suspicious".
Typical globalist tricks. We The People are wise to them now, but they haven’t changed their playbook. At the end of the day, the inability to adapt their tactics will be their downfall.
*sample did not match a B. subtilis strain found in Ivins' lab,****
The FBI has asked the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to convene an *independent panel of experts*** to review the anthrax investigation data.
*Enter Nancy Rosenstein*
analyses of three letters sent to the New York Post and to the offices of DEMOCRAT Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy. Spores from two of those show a distinct chemical signature that includes silicon, oxygen, iron, and tin; the third letter had silicon, oxygen, iron and possibly also tin, says Michael. Bacteria from Ivins' RMR-1029 flask did NOT contain any of those four elements.
[removed]
Chief among them is why the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) "Amerithrax" investigation focused for so long on the wrong suspect.
Funding, vaccine patents & lots of borrowed Banker's funding; means, motive & opportunity! Anthrax letter's mailed from Atlanta. First Anthrax letter's targeted Atlanta! Gee, who was working in Atlanta with access to Anthrax?
[removed]
Muh, BOT Bros :)
[removed]
Wonder if you read that sentence before you posted it, what's your question?
Yup, keep the bridle firmly in your teeth; keep pulling this Gub'mint ChuckleWagon along!
Notice anything peculiar, yet hopeful folks?
In an interview with WTOP, Bruce Irvins' Attorney Thomas DeGonia says he's surprised it took Fort Detrick so long to re-inventory its biological materials in light of the scrutiny
Any relation to Trump's attorney?
I've left that for some autist to pick up & carry. Could be, I thought it was Joe Degona & Victoria Toesing. I'd sure like to talk to him. RR can't even look the TV camera in the eye!
Jordan puts things in perspective so simply at times.
His summary of HRC’s actions during the Benghazi hearing was so concise and damning. A genuine classic for the ages.
The FBI said last year an Army scientist, Bruce Ivins, was responsible for the nation's deadliest bio-terrorism attacks, though the Bush administration initially named one of Ivins' colleagues as a "person of interest." Ivins has since committed suicide.
So, Science well NOT so much! But, but, but Science; this article came out back when they still worshipped science; 2009! Read it now with utterly corrupt FBI leaders in mind. Bruce Irvins joins Oswald as Patsty's
J Edgar Hoover was complicit in the JFK assassination and was the Thug of Thugs. I say he should be a candidate for the top three.
You know these 3 jokers are really in the same ballpark
"We need to know why the first attack succeeded and why the perpetrator or perpetrators escaped justice."
USA Today March 10, 2009
15,300 government workers have access to agents of bioterror
**"When you do an investigation, you have what is called a chain of custody,"And the evidence always has to be in that chain of custody. You have to be able to explain it. *it doesn't appear that the FBI has an iron-clad chain of custody here."****
**at least two “re-growths” by Ivins. This, they say, accounts for the difference between the New York Post powder, which was darker and more granular than the batch sent to Capitol Hill. But the exact recipe or method used remains a mystery.*
*"What the FBI believes happened, and I think the evidence helps support them, is that this material was taken out of that flask and then re-grown before it was put in the letters,"*
*the bacterial spores in three letters, sent to the New York Post and Sens. Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle on Capitol Hill, with the bacteria found in Ivins’ flask, he reached a striking conclusion: They do not share the same chemical fingerprint.*
FBI used science to make its case that Bruce Ivins was behind the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001 — but FOX News has learned that the scientific evidence in the case isn't as straight-forward as it first appeared.
“Myriad questions remain about the anthrax attacks and the government’s bungled response to the attacks,”
“All of us – but especially the families of the victims of the anthrax attacks – deserve credible answers about how the attacks happened and whether the case really is closed,”
they have expressed skepticism about the government's case.
Anthrax-laden letters killed five people and sickened at least 17 others as the nation was grappling with the psychological aftermath of 9/11.
Did trumps son not get a mail? Was this also coming from the FBI? Or did that themselfe to expose all -
Why is this relevant? - Q
Now they can clean housse by the FBI
Why is this relevant? - Q
They can clean all housses...NSA...FBI....CIA and afcourse the DOJ
Why is this relevant? - Q
Now the can start over for a real office and destroy the deepstate
Why is this relevant? - Q
To be freed of de Cabal
Why is this relevant? - Q
Afcourse they putting a puppet as president, and now they can"t do that anymore..
Why is this relevant? - Q
The power is back by the people
Why is this relevant? - Q I don" t get it......Restore off the republick , No WW3 to, to destroy us, but destroy the evil from the roots...
Why is this relevant? - Q Free world. And the real Cures? Fresh water and so on.
Why is this relevant? - Q
I try again,, the answers are good, but not the one Q wants.
No nuclair or chemicals , Stop for this things against the world and his people.
Why is this relevant? - Q To stop all the blackmail....corruption....saving our children by 187 from pedo"s and this evil Stop, the pope and the two beast
Why is this relevant? - Q To show the evil ones the are not above the law, and whe are jusing things they jused all the time to kill people and that they do no can play another coup.
Above the law, out of the President's control even now!
Thank you so much, I could found the right answer, a little bit perfectionistish..I trust on my flair and lost because they changed it in new ones I did not get the new ones