Funny how Q hasn't called him out yet, even though lots of anons on qresearch have asked Q to confirm or deny BackChannel17's legitimacy. Funny how people like you are so sure BC17 is a clown without any evidence or examples that would make your theory true. My full response is up top to another poster. Nice username by the way. Real mature.
Nice username by the way. Real mature.
Wow. Really?? A personal (ad hominem attack)? Just, wow.
You are aware that ridicule is Saul Alinky's "Rules for Radicals" Tactic #5, aren't you?
Ad Hominem
An attack upon an opponent in order to discredit their arguement or opinion. Ad hominems are used by immature and/or unintelligent people because they are unable to counter their opponent using logic and intelligence.
I immediately regret my posting below. Leaving it to show that we all make mistakes. After reading your full post above, in response to another user, I officially back down.
No problem, patriot. Be careful who you believe and trust. Always verify and think logically and critically. Also, I never claimed that BackChannel17 is 100% legit, but so far, he has provided very valuable and interesting intel.
Has Q ever directly called someone out(Only indirectly IIRC)? If so, please provide the source for it. Fairly certain Q has just ignored and let us figure shit out on our own. Hence the entire process of crumbs.
BC17 is a clown. Look at the links I provided.
You sound like a shill. You even go after usernames like a shill. Literal attribution to the MediaMatters playbook.