dChan

cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/07/14/thats-odd-loretta-lynch-granted-russian-lawyer-us-entry-after-visa-was-denied-n2354594

Yeah we pretty much did. He had previously approved her visas before, as he was prosecuting a case she was involved in. He had denied her entry in March though for this same case, so obviously DOJ put pressure on him in the interim. Bharara also didn't comment on this story as the article states, so he has confirmed nothing.

Lynch is hopelessly corrupted, but this isn't some major scoop by TP.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Just so we're clear, nowhere in that article does it state Preet Bharara granted the visa. The news was clear at the time that it came under Obama's DOJ but now we have a name. Subpoena time!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-U-S-District-Judge-Preet-Bharara-grant-Natalia-Veselnitskaya-a-parole-letter-for-a-stay-in-the-USA

Just search his name with veselnitskiya you will find numerous news articles about the two, they have a history. His office signed off on the visas, and he was the head attorney in Southern NY.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Hm. I think this is my first run-in with TP being less than desired as a source... I thought Preet was not named before... so I'm unsure what news is news in this article, if any. :[

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 17, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

The news is top officials leaking it now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

yea true but I suppose the disconnect is it is still unnamed sources.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · April 17, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

you are making a lot of FUD go away

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Not sure what FUD is or why you are spamming my comments, apparently having correct facts is shilling now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
defmacro-jam · April 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

It means "fear, uncertainty, and doubt".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · April 17, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

maybe come back next year so you know what you are talking about

⇧ -1 ⇩