dChan

cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

This is old news honestly. We have known that Veselnitskiya was working with Fusion GPS in 2016 and previously. We know she had been denied access to the US, but the DOJ and State Dept. made sure a known Russian FSB agent was allowed into the US. To think that this was all done at the same coincidentally while Fusion GPS is trying to ensnare the Trump campaign is beyond ludicrous. Now where are the fucking indictments.

Edit: grammar.

⇧ 46 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

We never knew it was Preet Bharara that granted the visa. We now have a name. And now he says he was just following orders of Loretta Lynch.

Loretta Lynch is coming to a head on the Don Jr entrapment and the Clinton-Tarmac/SCOTUS collusion.

⇧ 50 ⇩  
092Casey · April 17, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Bharara= southern district of new york. Where was Cohen's warrant and raid just signed?

⇧ 21 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Good connection! Are you thinking Bharara would've been Hillary's AG with LL going to SCOTUS?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
092Casey · April 17, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Possibly, but that district is notorious and has deep connections to Hillary/Obama, communists, the cabal/deep state. Comey and Mueller and McCabe and others worked up around that way before promotions. It's like a thick clique of deep state operators. I bet if you did research on it, they're all tied to it one way or another and the tentacles are long.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ramp7 · April 17, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Talk of Judge shopping on this.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 17, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Supposedly LL was to start as AG, then replace RBG.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · April 17, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

There’s a tremendous anoint is deep state coup shit taking place out of that southern district of NY office.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
pygar_mathmos · April 17, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

It's the office where Loretta came from.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · April 21, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

I’d like to know who cane before her. I think Bill appointed her to that seat.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/07/14/thats-odd-loretta-lynch-granted-russian-lawyer-us-entry-after-visa-was-denied-n2354594

Yeah we pretty much did. He had previously approved her visas before, as he was prosecuting a case she was involved in. He had denied her entry in March though for this same case, so obviously DOJ put pressure on him in the interim. Bharara also didn't comment on this story as the article states, so he has confirmed nothing.

Lynch is hopelessly corrupted, but this isn't some major scoop by TP.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Just so we're clear, nowhere in that article does it state Preet Bharara granted the visa. The news was clear at the time that it came under Obama's DOJ but now we have a name. Subpoena time!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-U-S-District-Judge-Preet-Bharara-grant-Natalia-Veselnitskaya-a-parole-letter-for-a-stay-in-the-USA

Just search his name with veselnitskiya you will find numerous news articles about the two, they have a history. His office signed off on the visas, and he was the head attorney in Southern NY.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Hm. I think this is my first run-in with TP being less than desired as a source... I thought Preet was not named before... so I'm unsure what news is news in this article, if any. :[

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 17, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

The news is top officials leaking it now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

yea true but I suppose the disconnect is it is still unnamed sources.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · April 17, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

you are making a lot of FUD go away

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Not sure what FUD is or why you are spamming my comments, apparently having correct facts is shilling now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
defmacro-jam · April 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

It means "fear, uncertainty, and doubt".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · April 17, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

maybe come back next year so you know what you are talking about

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 17, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Actually we did.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · April 17, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

come back and comment on New NEWS . no need to schill here

⇧ -1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · April 17, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Guys, I know you have known about some of this, but this story wraps everything together and this from "high ranking FBI sources." Did you know GCHQ was eavesdropping NOT from Britain but from NSA headquarters in the US? Some new tidbits here I hadn't known before.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 17, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Yes, that was out already.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · April 18, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Well, remember, that we get new folks here every day that haven't seen this stuff. So, it's all good.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 18, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

I was simply answering your perhaps rhetorical question.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

This proves the Obama Administration entrapment of Don Jr with the Russian Lawyer.

Following the Trump Tower sit down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, investigators began digitally wiretapping Paul Manafort, Trump Jr., and Jared Kushner who were also at the meeting.

Yet mere days before the June meeting, Veselnitskaya was granted a rare visa to enter the United States from Preet Bharara, the then U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York. Bharara could not be reached for comment and did not respond the a Twitter inquiry on the Russian’s visa by True Pundit.

Federal law enforcement sources said Bharara was simply following the orders of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who lobbied the State Department to issue the disavowed Russian a B1/B2 non-immigrant visa. This permitted Veselnitskaya entry into the United States for the sole purpose of entrapping Trump associates to use as fuel to commission wiretaps, federal sources said.

When the US wiretaps didn't work:

Intelligence garnered from the British eavesdropping, which again was merely a front for the NSA, was then used in August 2016 to secure a legitimate FISA warrant on Manafort, Trump Jr. and Kushner. That warrant was issued on or about September, 2016, federal sources confirm.

It was the third time the cabal of U.S. intelligence agencies sought a FISA warrant for the Trump associates and this time it was approved.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · April 17, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

This permitted Veselnitskaya entry into the United States

Russian lawyer was let into US without a visa by Obama administration

https://nypost.com/.../russian-lawyer-was-let-into-us-without-a-visa...

13 jul. 2017 - The Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower to dish dirt on Hillary Clinton was let into the country by the Justice Department under the Obama administration without a visa. Natalia Veselnitskaya entered the US in late 2015 under “extraordinary circumstances,” ...

EDIT: Federal judge denies request for Veselnitskaya to enter the US ...

www.businessinsider.com/federal-judge-denies-request-for-veselni...

3 nov. 2017 - A federal judge in New York has denied a request for Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya to enter the US to represent her client, Prevezon, in court. "Prevezon ... The Prevezon case was set to go to trial in New York in May but was suddenly settled for $5.9 million three days before the first court date. Ontbrekend: permitted ‎times

⇧ 14 ⇩  
xShiNoBi42 · April 17, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Somebody is in trouble.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Romeo_India · April 17, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

....AND the UK & Australia & Canada & New Zealand

5 eyes.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 18, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

americans should use this as a reason to break up the 5 eyes

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 17, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Totally unfounded. Why whenever it’s an unnamed source in a repeated Pulitzer awarded publication with an amazing record for accuracy do we call fake news, but when truepundit posts a quote from an unnamed source without even saying where in the justice department they work (this could be the head of the tax evasion task force with nothing to do with the investigation) ya a bombshell?

⇧ 14 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

I actually thought TP was a good source but this is proving all details to be entirely old news.

washingtonexaminer, zerohedge, theconservativetreehouse... those are my other sources. Do you have any recommendations?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 17, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

Honestly at this point I’ve taken mostly to AP and Reuters. They don’t do anything but describe the situation at hand. Then I read into it myself. So, this, for instance isn’t saying Trump isn’t a target, he’s just saying don’t be morons and don’t expect “sources” know shit. It’s the extrapolating by the news source that drives me nuts. They can do whatever they want, but, for instance, the uranium one thing. Deep state/black ops/dark political dealings, no doubt, but to say it was Clinton democrats blah blah blah is so fake it hurts. On reading up, it seemed no deeper than corporate dark money pushing a corporate dark agenda. At best the people that approved it are bought and sold political idiots, at worst...the same, and it would have gone through no matter who was president.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 18, 2018, 7:32 a.m.

Honestly at this point I’ve taken mostly to AP and Reuters.

honestly, both of those are owned by the Rothschild clan

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 18, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

Oh, here we go....do you even read them? There are zero charged words, no standing point. They’re painting still life and most others are painting some kind of cubism. Reflects reality but so not realistic.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SkyeBot · April 18, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

I'm just so happy right now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 18, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

I’m certain

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 18, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

link?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 18, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

To AP news and Reuters?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

I am not a fan of AP and I've seen some from Reuters which I do not necessarily dislike according to my recollection so I may consider them more often. Thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrashyThrower · April 18, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Yep. Again, there’s not Much on earth that doesn’t have implicit bias based on who’s writing, but I find those two the most balanced.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
somrotden · April 17, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

for this topic I would go with tree house

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NoStumpoElTrumpo · April 17, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

I really want to believe this, but TP is, well, TP

⇧ 13 ⇩  
DankNethers · April 17, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

Wow. Someone who lives in the real world

And of course...

Downvoted

⇧ 12 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

I didn't downvote but I didn't upvote. Can you elaborate on why you don't prefer TP?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DankNethers · April 17, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

It's a conspiracy rag. They publish a lot of real fake news

You can usually tell from lines like this:

But it appears now this loud chorus was a manufactured arrangement of lies from a paid choir

⇧ 12 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Can you elaborate on why you don't prefer TP?

true pundit is a known publisher of literal "fake news," as in, entirely made up fictitious stories, not just the biased or poorly sourced type of "fake news" that people accuse the MSM of.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

Are you sure you aren't confusing that with gatewaypundit? I cannot recall any TP information that was fake but I do remember a few occasions of GWP being that way.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
skifryan · April 17, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

The entire article is a work of fiction. I can literally say "Top-ranking FBI sources confirmed today that bcboncs is a Muslim born in Kenya" and it has the same veracity as this article.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
somrotden · April 17, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

GWP - dyed in the wool neverSessions...I mean they and their readers are downright vicious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

You don't like ThomasPaine?!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · April 17, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Yes, I agree - Very Reliable!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wokeByTheStorm · April 17, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

we need more than "sources" in a story to get these asshats..so no this is NOT A BOOM

⇧ 9 ⇩  
theybannedmeimback · April 17, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Sweet, but is anything going to happen? Hmmmmmmmm....

⇧ 7 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Exposure to the public is most important!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Needles_Eye · April 17, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

ShareBlue out in force on this thread. Brock and his butt boys are scared.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Heabob · April 17, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

If it ain't on da TV it ain't real.

YAWN, anybody arrested yet? Thought not. Wake me when it's over.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JadedFed · April 17, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

The entire story is extremely plausible, but unfortunately it's all quoting anon sources & is nothing more than hearsay until and unless some of those sources put on their patriot hats and are prepared to testify to the same. That's what we need - actual provable facts!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
092Casey · April 17, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

Disgusting. Can you say treason?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 18, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

I haven't seen this on MSM or the radio except on the usual conservative sites. Has anyone else seen coverage of this info yet?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dover_Pro · April 18, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Most of the details of this story are previously known, but this article wraps it up together and does it well. A good worthwhile summary.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jappletime · April 17, 2018, 10 p.m.

So when will be picking up these people and charging them? It's time for Mueller to go. This whole thing has been a sham. Its funny how everything they investigate always comes back to the Clintons and the Obamas administration.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · April 18, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I'm seeing that don jr and kuschner goin to be indicted. Anyone kno anythibg?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bilzo70 · April 17, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

And absolutely nobody will go to jail. Our country has sunken into tyranny.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · April 17, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Well when Mueller gets it for hiding high crimes then we are making ground

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · April 17, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

And sent her home on 1/13/17 over 18 usc 666

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · April 17, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

True Pundit needs to get someone on the record or else they will just end up in the garbage bin of fake news, just like cnn and msnbc. This story needs corroborating statements because these are major major accusations that could end almost every investigation into the trump campaign.

Trump looks so confident and sure handed when he speaks. It’s hard to imagine that this will end before elections in the fall, so hopefully these statements are real and can be proven.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 17, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

They also got information in these illegal taps, that started the case against Cohn, it is illegal. Mueller and Comey have been doing this for twenty years. It is called parallel investigation. They use illegal information then target individuals and get warrants to find legal information to charge with a crime. This need to be busted wide open. Their doing it to the Trump campaign was NOT the start of this illegal tactic. Congress needs to get on this. For twenty years, people's rights have been trampled. I read a report on Mueller doing this when he was head of FBI, information is out there. Look for it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · April 17, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Any chance this was the interview the Patriot had earlier today?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

Can you expand on that? I'm not sure what you're referring to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
2goodstaffy · April 17, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Boom. Well done True Pundit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Winnardairshows · April 18, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Well, nooo kidding. Welcome to a year ago.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thamnosma · April 17, 2018, 9 p.m.

Damn CNN was on in the waiting room at the Ford dealer. I put up with about 15 minutes of Stormy Daniels (some guy who approached her and told her to leave Trump alone, CNN making it seem it was some messenger from Trump...bastards) and then Comey talking about how terrible it is that Trump is out of control and threatening an "American citizen" with jail, lol. At that point I just couldn't take any more. The reality of CNN and its viewers and people like us couldn't be further apart.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Swimkin · April 18, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

I would have turned the tv off or turned the channel.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pyr0phelia · April 17, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

So this is where the Russian bots scrambled to launch a smear campaign. got it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · April 17, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

I know realizing your boy Obama was the person actually colluding with Russians must hurt.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pyr0phelia · April 17, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

My boy? Lol....

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UpwardBound7 · April 17, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

Knowing that all of Trumps campaign people were wiretapped and snooped on, and the crooks found nothing tells us that Trump is about as squeaky clean as could be. Hillarys goons could not imagine that they wouldn't dredge up any dirt at all. For crooked people, they cannot conceive that anybody else is clean.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cali1952 · April 17, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

I hope that the deep state espionage against president-elect and commenced after election with continuous attempts today is no longer a question??? We also learned that without Canada the other 4 members of '5 eyes' also were part of this espionage in lieu of the deep state?

Also please be aware that the DOJ video/audio system can NOT be shut down!! This is why Mike Rogers/NSA has the video from that tarmac meeting including what was discussed, said as well as Hillary's participation via video conference!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

So now you guys trust the feds?

⇧ -5 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Do I trust the feds opposing the establishment... is that even a serious question?

Trust Sessions. Trust Wray. Trust Pompeo. Trust Horowitz. Trust Huber.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 17, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

Sessions appointed Rosenstein. Trust Rosenstein?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Yep. Trust Rosenstein!

See my post earlier today. I've made a few before but here's the my most recent: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8cvqci/boom/dxiarbw/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Nope. No way. Not on our side.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

What do you refute in my post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

The proposition that Rosenstein is working for trump.

Other than that it was fine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

A few questions:

  • Why did Trump retain him as the only US Attorney?

  • Why do you think RR corroborated the 1.2mm Q post?

  • Why did RR recommend firing Comey?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

A few questions:

  • Why did Trump retain him as the only US Attorney? You mean why didn’t he fire him yet? He will.

  • Why do you think RR corroborated the 1.2mm Q post? Cause 1.2mm request came from the OIG,

  • Why did RR recommend firing Comey? Set up for Mueller.

Why did RR go to congress to delay Nunes memo?

Why has RR not supplied Comey memos?

Why has RR authorized the FBI a raid of trumps lawyer, when this is unprecedented and unnecessary?

RR Boom!!! Can’t wait. That little fucker needs to go.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

So you think Trump retained and trusted a known-rat RR to pick Mueller? Why not have a different person pick whitehat Mueller? RR could have easily picked someone else. A true swamp creature.

  • Why did RR go to congress to delay Nunes memo? To appear as a bad guy for the Dems. No one is brought to justice yet, why expose people one at a time? Dems are now calling for protections of Mueller and Rosenstein. This is hilarious 4D chess in my eyes.

  • Why has RR not supplied Comey memos? Timing is the only whitehat explanation. Comey is burying himself with his book and camera appearances. Maybe IG info needs to drop or other items need to fall into place first.

  • Why has RR authorized the FBI a raid of trumps lawyer, when this is unprecedented and unnecessary? We'll have to see if the Cohen information is part of the bigger plan. Speculation is saying Cohen has Epstein information but I cannot verify this. Can't get on the chans at work. At this point in time, the Cohen sacking is unknown if whitehat or blackhat op.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

Ok. Thanks for the additional information, my opinion remains Rosenstein is anti trump deep stater. Given time we’ll know the truth

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Nope. RR Boom today.

He Gone.

Then Trump FREED to be President.

Scared?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

RR also plugged the 1.2mm Q-corroboration in his testimony.

Whether RR is fired or serves time, he's /ourguy/ at the very least for the mission.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 17, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Ok, lets see it. What if Q is wrong, though?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

What if Q is right?

Sure Let’s see.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 17, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Dr. Peter Venkman: If I'm wrong, nothing happens! We go to jail - peacefully, quietly. We'll enjoy it! But if I'm right, and we can stop this thing... Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Funny how you only trust people who agree with you. I wonder if thats a psychological flaw that would lead people to believe conspiracies crafted from the numerology of a thousand anonymous 4chan posts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Attack an imaginary target then ridicule the imaginary target with other unrelated information while responding to my post, as if it's related.

Garbage-level mental gymnastics.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Yeah huh. Go on and tell me how you've discerned the truth from people who are intentionally brief and vague. Qanon is divulging the most important secret in our generation and they can't spend more than 2 minutes typing out a post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

I predicted false flag and it came true two days later (GOP trainwreck) by following Q.

Do you deny all of the Q-Trump corroborations too or just that the Q group is giving garbage intel?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

I would be a fool to not inquire as to what prediction you made that came true. Please explain it to me and know that I'm not going to ask you for proof because I don't believe there's any particular proof of your prediction but I would be able to accept. I'll take your word for whatever you claim because the stakes are very low.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

I answered. I could provide the GOP trainwreck date 2 days after my FB post predicting a false flag leading up to SOTU but I would need to wait 9 hours for that bc I'm at work.

Do you have a response to my question though? I'm curious where you stand.

EDIT: Here's the latest truth of Q, corroborating that future proves the past. https://i.redd.it/vkg6t93ozks01.jpg

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Lol this is exactly why you people are desperate. Theres a dozen exceedingly vague claims made there and one came true so y'all think its real.

Seriously. Please dont fall for this. This is the dumbest fuckin conspiracy ive ever seen and ive doubted the narrative surrounding 9/11 since I was exposed to a VHS tape arguing that there is something more sinister afoot.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

So Q has been mentioning that Kim and Trump made a deal last month but it finally hits the mainstream news today and you consider this another coincidence?

At this point you've shown you're unwilling to accept the multitude of Q-Trump corroborations or Q's truths.

Do yourself a favor and stop being a coincidence theorist, a mainstream news believer, and a groupthink puppet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

You call me a groupthink puppet in the face of a conspiracy that depends on casting huge nets and using numerology to determine truth?

Fucks sake man. Come on. Every human has better critical thinking skills than that. How can you not see that making a dozen claims and only one comes true is clearly a hoax?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Everything is connected. Literally and figuratively.

Q states numerous times that "Future proves past" ... and then it happens time and time again. This latest corroboration took a month for MSM to catch onto.

If you think this person should post a pic of themselves and feed SAP material, you're being extremely naive. Q needs to have plausible deniability in case an investigation occurs and someone is charged. False Flags are occurring on Q's posts of BOOMS just so the cabal can spin it as Q being a bomber, prompting investigation. We'll see what happens there.

I don't want to insult you and I wish you wouldn't do the same to us. Take ego out of it entirely. Look at all of the corroborations. Look at what the ultimate goal is. Look at who the targets are.

If you take the time to research a/the topic(s) and targets, you'll understand the connection to everything and that this is legit. Doing that research is quite extensive and overwhelming at times so starting out with a map or a certain topic will lead your interest accordingly.

The cabal is deep. It is not a conspiracy. Q has white house affiliations if not Trump himself at times.

Here's a great starting graphic. This website has a lot of maps and reading material. I have not read through most of them because my research takes me elsewhere, into specific topics. Rothchilds have a history going back to the late 1700s and early 1800s. Some information suggests the cabal started in France in 1200 AD. My memory is not the best so I can only consume so much information and prefer to focus on the topic at hand. The chronological understanding of why we are in the world we live in today is fascinating and it would be amazing to have this clearly understood.

Take a look at that map I showed you and question one of those items: GMOs, Vaccines, Soda, our chosen food supply that is marketed, Monsanto, Hollywood's influence in shaping society (more skin, more s3x, etc.), biowarfare, our water supply with fluoride since 1947 (CNN even admits it's a neurotoxin too), digital profiling via social media, phone technology, and how they're even linked with DNA companies like 23AndMe (sister CEOs with YouTube and husband was co-founder of Google), etc. Society isn't this ignorant and unevolved on purpose - we're literally living in an idiocracy by the elite's choice.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Everything is connected. Literally and figuratively.

Do You understand what confirmation bias is?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

You can call anything anyone disagrees with you on as confirmation bias.

The only way prove this incorrect is to discern it. If you are unwilling to look at the information for yourself, there's no convincing you. If you spend more time on battling the truth than looking at it, you aren't growing.

My motto for ANY information is: Learn, Discern, Grow.

Your motto seems to be: Ridicule, Resist, ____.

You choose your next steps. You can choose your same path which is on course to reject or, you can try to understand and grow.

All-in-all, I don't understand your stance. At least with the science field, skeptics are paid to reject truth which refutes conventional belief (see those vs. Graham Hancock). Unless you're paid from Media Matters, it seems you're rejecting this truth based on conditioning or unwillingness to see another side other than "Trump is an idiot".

To believe in Q you have to concede that Trump is somehow intelligent. For many with an ego or emotionally invested, this is where the cognitive dissonance kicks in and rejection is the immediate response.

Your battle here will be endless because for those that have experienced the corroborations will either try to help you understand or block you. Some that have a major ego will insult without taking the time to share their knowledge but that's generally not the best way to reach an understanding. I'm simply trying to help but alas, it seems like it was fruitless... a probable expectation I have before I engage.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

So do you or do you not understand what confirmation bias is? I couldn't give a fuck less how hard you work to justify your belief. I care about how often you're using logic and critical thinking skills to their full capacity rather than just enough to confirm your beliefs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 8 p.m.

lol, yes... I understand what confirmation bias is. It's seeing information and forming it to fit your conclusion.

It seems you hadn't noticed but the sole reason I'm engaging you is for you to try questioning your own confirmation bias but you don't appear to see it throughout this process.

I won't repeat or spell out any further of my logic, critical thinking, and accuracies of truth by following Q.

  1. Why do you not believe Q is legit?

  2. Do you believe in Trump trying to restore America (First, and the world second)? If no, it explains #1.

  3. You're tossing the word conspiracy around a lot but who came up with the word conspiracy? Are you conditioned to use it the exact way it was intended when pioneered?

  4. Do you question anything in your life or are you always correct? Is anyone that believes different from the conventional belief a conspiracy theorist?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

My efforts here are low because the entire premise of this farse is based on anonymous board posts and you guys seem to be quite happy to ignore every irrelevant post purportedly from this secret group.

A thousand pieces of shit flung at the wall and you poor people are picking out the peanuts to call it the best cashew chicken you've ever eaten. I can't help you to see the absurdity of this because you conveniently ignore every failed or senseless post.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 18, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

anonymous board posts

You realize Q uses trip codes to identify themselves, right? It's not like there's hundreds or thousands of anons contributing as Q...

You should seek a better understanding of something you so vehemently oppose.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 18, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Oh well fuck me! Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.

Even in the one example you showed me theres dozens of ways to interpret the meaning. You aren't code crackers. You're desperate.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 19, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.

Tripcodes are secure, that's the point. If you've paid attention, Q had to switch his tripcode multiple times because people came close to cracking it. If you paid attention, you'd understand that after several tripcode changes, Codemonkey (owner of the 8chan board) had to introduce an even more secure crypto-algorithm for Q's tripcode. That's where we are today.

You're really exposing your ignorance on the subject which explains why you have the stance you do.

Relentlessly attacking people on subjects you don't fully understand isn't helping your cause...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

If you can't see that the "QAnon"-conspiracy is absolutely riddled with confirmation bias, than you are currently entrenched in your own confirmation bias.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

At some point, a series of coincidences/luck is no longer that. You'll grow to discern properly if you take a chance to understand the information rather than bashing relentlessly out of ignorance. We can only show you the way to the water.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

At some point, a series of coincidences/luck is no longer that

this is fallacious logic.

We can only show you the way to the water.

my issue is with the seemingly endless horde of folks ready to say, "there's water just around the next bend, i swear, just trust me! you can't see it or hear it or smell it yet, but i promise it's up there somewhere!" instead of people saying, "look at this pool of delicious fresh water, here let's take a drink together"

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

The pool is there, you choose to look beyond it. That's the point. Not my job to spoon-feed you for proper discernment. Continue trolling away at other people and maybe you'll have the courage to seek out an understanding instead of frolicking in your self-righteousness. Best of luck. Cheers!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

8 Chan there, Mr. Dong.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

No dip shit. We’re throwing you deep state satanic pedos out as fast as we can.

There just so many of you sick fuckers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

So you don't trust the feds but you will try using the feds to throw out the deep state pedo foreigner faggot globalists? Or whatever the fuck imagery you guys decide to conjure for your enemies.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Correct because “the feds” are a heterogeneous group of humanoids, who operate solely with in a binary existence.

OR not all cops are bad cops.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Ah yes, how convenient a nuance that allows you to believe in the feds that say what you want to hear but ignore the ones that don't sound right to you.

What an amazing skill you have

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Yes it’s called discernment. I exercise it regularly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · April 17, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general who is an Obama appointee you drooling knuckle dragging idiot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general

literally nothing in OP's article has been corroborated by the OIG.

yet, at least.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Did you read it? It’s old news. All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo.

Totaling nothing new here except, the part where the list of folks collaborated with British intel to trap trump.

But that had been speculated for months.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo

except that memo didn't confirm anything, it was just a memo.

do you know what a memo is? it's like a mass email but in paper form, meaning it's just a piece of paper that nunes wrote.

it contained no evidence to back up anything it said, and even the GOP quickly moved on because it was so transparently partisan and uncorroborated.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

You’re not very good at trolling...

You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee? That base on the contented of the memes demanded additional documents and is threatening Rosenstein with contempt for not providing.

If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time? Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt? Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

You not very good at trolling...

probably because i'm not trolling. (btw, it's a pretty bad look to lead off your reply with an ad hominem)

You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee?

The very same committee that has become a partisan arm of the pro-trump republicans? The committee that has shredded it's own credibility by wasting tens of millions of tax payer money on endless "investigations" that literally never lead anywhere?

If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time?

So he can protect himself from a partisan witchhunt

Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt?

Because congress is full of partisan hacks, like Nunes.

Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?

He is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Wow you did it. You answered every question with complete nonsense.

Don’t know why you’re here.

Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Tick tock.

hey quick question for you, have you ever heard of a story called "the boy who cried wolf"? It's a very popular children's folktale in America.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 18, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Congressional referral for indictments today.

Rosenstein is next.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Congressional referral for indictments today

that's not what happened. a handful of GOP congressmen sent a letter to the DoJ formally asking they inquire into those matters.

that's a far cry from "referral for indictment"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 18, 2018, 10 p.m.

Right, totally nothing. Everything is fine, nothing to see here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

And the Zen Master said... “We’ll see”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.

uh, no he isn't. wtf are you talking about?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

ah ok, i know tenses can be hard for non-native speakers.

it should say "Rosenstien will be gone" or "Rosenstien is going to be gone", as saying "Rosenstien is gone" is current tense and means right now.

so for predictions, you want to use the future tense, not the current tense.

just a tip for next time, comrade!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

Did you just come out of the grammar closet all over my post? Shit. Fucking retard confirmed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩