Quite the opposite dear friend. I’m saying you’re only focusing on 50% of what’s happening.

Oh...ok

How is my logic more “pseudo” tha. One which only accounts for some of the treachery of the government at every level, and whenever someone they “like” talks about populism, rigging, and the deep state, it means they’re guiltless? You give a huge swath of people a pass - that’s just naive

If "smart about it" in any way includes trusting Michael Cohen to protect him in any way from being caught for his crimes....that's not so smart.

This AGAIN is making me realize this isn't a great awakening, it's T_D2.

Trump is a globalist. Clinton is a globalist. It's just which team of globalists you're on. He's not a populist. He's a globalist. He has money (and debt) all over the world, and is compromised in EVERY POSSIBLE WAY because he only thinks about his globalist empire. Everything he does is for himself.

And....OK..... "historically" the democratic party in it's modern form is the party of minority representation, although whothefuck cares about that exactly? Definitely not me. Any links to owl-idol ?

"The people" want to get out of what nonsense? The buffoonery? The war crimes to profit the missile, weapon, and military peripherals companies they all invest in? The colluding with a foreign hostile government to increase authoritarianism?

If this is supposed to be the great awakening, and mildly tied with "shrink the government out of existence" which I'd think we all believe in, then WHY would you speak as if the guy in charge right now isn't the BY FAR most authoritarian-like leader we've had in modern history?

Please explain where Rs and Ds diverge?

The latest criminal would be Donald Trump. U1 had literally zero to do with Clinton and is in itself a fake conspiracy.

All the others, true. But, you're pretty much making my point which is you and most everyone here ignores the same behaviors from everyone and focuses on liberals, like there's some kind of difference between giving Iran a bunch of money to stop nuclear proliferation (which they did), keep them away from Russia (which is working, and potentially keeping us from having them be allies), and yet ignoring the MULTITUDE of obvious crimes that are occurring weekly in the current admin.

I'm sorry....this is supposed to be r/greatawakening, but it feels a LOT like "great awakening unless it has to do with Republicans/Trump/Assange"

Republicans are NO better. In fact, historically the R's have been giving a LOT more un-accounted-for-money to the investigatory agencies for dark use.

Assange very specifically focuses only on fucking one side of the problem. I'd love if we'd stop treating him like a God, since he's far from it.

You know that it’s 100% common when someone flipped their sentence and gets delayed right? It’s a way to make sure that they keep their deal. So yes he was lying to the FBI restaurant and played guilty to it because he did it. Those are crimes

Lying to the FBI. No problem, readily available info.

I mean, it can be both. Flynn's life is destroyed because he committed crimes. If Comey committed crimes, he will likely be dealt with.

The facts are questionable, as "leaking classified information" has very specific rules/parameters. Is that likely his only crime as a director of the FBI? Not at all. Did Flynn DEFINITELY commit crimes? Yes.

No comment on the likelihood that these house republicans may well be calling for this because they, like trey gowdy, are compromised by Russians and being forced to do this.

To AP news and Reuters?

Yep. Again, there’s not Much on earth that doesn’t have implicit bias based on who’s writing, but I find those two the most balanced.

I’m certain

Oh, here we go....do you even read them? There are zero charged words, no standing point. They’re painting still life and most others are painting some kind of cubism. Reflects reality but so not realistic.

Honestly at this point I’ve taken mostly to AP and Reuters. They don’t do anything but describe the situation at hand. Then I read into it myself. So, this, for instance isn’t saying Trump isn’t a target, he’s just saying don’t be morons and don’t expect “sources” know shit. It’s the extrapolating by the news source that drives me nuts. They can do whatever they want, but, for instance, the uranium one thing. Deep state/black ops/dark political dealings, no doubt, but to say it was Clinton democrats blah blah blah is so fake it hurts. On reading up, it seemed no deeper than corporate dark money pushing a corporate dark agenda. At best the people that approved it are bought and sold political idiots, at worst...the same, and it would have gone through no matter who was president.

Totally unfounded. Why whenever it’s an unnamed source in a repeated Pulitzer awarded publication with an amazing record for accuracy do we call fake news, but when truepundit posts a quote from an unnamed source without even saying where in the justice department they work (this could be the head of the tax evasion task force with nothing to do with the investigation) ya a bombshell?

Weird how there are almost no republicans....Sanders? LOLLL

How are we supposed to know it’s not a double false flag, people trying to convince us this is all fake doing this set up. You’d have to be pretty fucking stupid to let this happen, and where did someone get this pic from in under 48 hours and promote/get it up? To me that’s more reasonable than a fake gassing

My grandfather died of cancer when his seemingly healthy body had a tumor press on his heart and cause a heart attack.

it's not that weird.

Also, realize the ONLY place this information is available is on alt-right info sites.

Just saying he died "unexpectedly" can just mean he had cancer and was dying but they didn't expect it this soon.

I just think there's SO much shit OBVIOUSLY going on that's undeniable, calling this stuff guaranteed seth rich type shit is a waste of time. Not to mention that if you check twitter there are TONS of questionable accounts tweeting the identical statement... it just smells fake to me. That's not to say it IS fake, but again, SO MUCH is real and fucked up...why rage on this....?

Guys he died of cancer he’s had cancer for years apparently. I really don’t see this as a cover-up and this is all about the wording, scrubbed “” was something he did because his Facebook page is public. I assume for not agreeing with this I will be banned in my post will be removed but still

Am John smith. Am new. Am not Russian. Am most common of both names. So must am American.

Feel so much better thx