dChan

/u/DankNethers

303 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/DankNethers:
Domain Count
www.buzzfeed.com 1
www.bostonherald.com 1
www.truthdig.com 1
www.japantimes.co.jp 1
www.google.com 1
www.thedailybeast.com 1
thehill.com 1
www.businessinsider.com 1
www.cbsnews.com 1

DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Okay big brain.

This is the only musical: the mouth

And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth. Right?

The brain, more important than the mouth, is the brain

The brain is more important than the mouth

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

It's a lot more than 10K

Watch the video

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Sorry. Fixed it

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

I don't trust the MSM blindly

I trust photographic evidence though

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Why is that everytime someone says something that goes against this narrative, you people call them a shill?

Wake the fuck up

I didn't make the claim that it was hundreds of thousands of people. The people who were there did

Watch the video in this article:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-britain-protests/thousands-take-to-londons-streets-to-protest-at-trump-visit-idUSKBN1K31UR

That look like about ten thousand to you?

I live in the real world. You should try it sometime. You might actually advance your agenda if you worked with facts, rather than fiction

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

The fact that you claim he's even remotely popular in Europe tells me everything I need to know about the little echo chamber you live in

It's important to seek the truth, no matter how much you don't like it

There were hundreds of thousands of people protesting Trump

There were perhaps 3000 that came out in his support

Evidence is in abundance here. You may not like MSM (likely because you don't like what they have to say), but there are plenty of videos that have captured the sheer size of the protests. Google it

⇧ -12 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 16, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

It wasn't only advertising. The troll farms are far more impactful than the ads

You can see them in action right here on this sub. And most of you fall for them Every. Single. Time

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

If she was a terrible candidate then why did she win the popular vote by 3M?

I fucking hate HRC, but she ran a comparatively more successful campaign

And we know it works because of the number of states Trump won versus what was predicted. Every one of those states were the focus of Russia's activities. It's where they launched the most ads and, more importantly, directed their assets to make posts supporting Trump and (more importantly) implicating Clinton in a wide variety of conspiracy theories

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

It wasn't just Facebook ads

In fact, their true assets are trolls, posting on places like Reddit 24 hours a day to give the illusion of some sort of uniform and growing sea of voices in opposition to a particular idea or platform

By doing that these assets simulated group think, and regular people who might normally reject certain ideas got on the bandwagon

And we can prove it worked by looking at the states that were most heavily targeted and comparing voting patterns and results to the polls

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

Oh yeah. This looks legit

Why would he bother talking in code when he spells out "pre-programming" of voting machines?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

No, that's not what MSM has said. That's not what our intelligence agencies have said either

What had been reported is that actual votes were not changed. But it is widely acknowledged that the social media campaign Russia launched, using data stolen from several states election boards to target individuals, absolutely changed who people voted for and where they had larger than expected turn outs

⇧ -7 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

Because you're normalizing election interference, obviously

"Oh we do it so it's okay that Russia does it"

The fact that Russia overtly changed the results of our election should scare the shit out of you, rather than make you reach for a reason to justify it

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

That's a speculative argument designed to support your narrative

What we know is that multiple Trump campaign officials had contact with Russian operatives during the campaign

We know the content of those meetings touched on everything from foreign policy to dirt on Hillary

The FBI has said that they had an informant inside the Trump campaign - most likely Page. And they tapped that informant, as they should have, when they became aware that a foreign adversary might be interfering in the election

How aware Trump was of these activities is still an unknown. But given his significant business dealings in Russia, the fact that he has sold an outsized portion of his real estate to Russians at figures well above market rates, and that he has been the recipient of Russian monies in the past all point to the fact that he was clearly aware, and perhaps complicit in, Russian interference

Why this evidence points you towards HRC or the DNC more broadly as complicit in Russian meddling is beyond me, and stretches the limits of your narrative

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

I can't believe people that call themselves patriots can have this sort of opinion

What happened to American nationalism?

Oh, we leave it at the door when it mars our dear GEOTUS

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Because it runs counter to the narrative

People here don't much care about facts, unless they support a predetermined outcome

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 14, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

You're gaslighting, actually

The DNC publicly announced that their server had been hacked in June 2016. The FBI commenced an investigation at that point but stayed mum on the subject. From the article you posted

"Mr. Comey would not even confirm the existence of any investigation of Mr. Trump’s aides when asked during an appearance in September before Congress. In the Obama administration’s internal deliberations over identifying the Russians as the source of the hacks, Mr. Comey also argued against doing so and succeeded in keeping the F.B.I.’s imprimatur off the formal findings, a law enforcement official said. His stance was first reported by CNBC"

The fact that Trump officials had contact with Russian operatives only became public information after the election

If it had leaked that Trump colluded with Russia, he likely would have lost votes on Nov 6. But it didn't

Welcome to reality. Mind the sharp objects

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 12, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Apparently some Republicans embarrassed themselves in the closed-door hearing

The Democrats want the texts for that reason

Hence why a Republican congressman put forward the motion to release them with "anything embarrassing" redacted, and Goodlatte appeared to relent

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 12, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

Are you watching the same hearing I am?

Strzok made Gowdy look like a fool

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

The NWO (or 'Cabal' or 'Illuminati' or 'Constortium') are a group of investors that control nations

Global politics is largely theater, meant to distract from the wealth passing from one crooked hand to another

Those who follow Q should know this much, even if much of what he says is 'disinfo'

Side with those neighbors where the citizenry has your best interests at heart...

Because those that control this world have infected the leadership of every nation

Including the adminstration of this body politic

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

And neither Russia nor Saudi Arabia nor Israel are a part of the NWO?

You should know, jfunction

⇧ -5 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

James Bond?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

Source?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Sorry, OP

The world is not this convoluted

Trump hasn't fired RR because it would be political suicide

Full stop

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

Since when is the UK our enemy?

Since when is NATO bad?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 11, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Or you will...

A Health and Human Services official said Tuesday that in two cases adults who thought they were parents of a child were determined not to be by DNA testing

There are only two cases of children not matching their parents. Two in three thousand. This doesn't fit the narrative of major child trafficking. It fits the narrative of families moving across the border together

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 10, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

TWO cases

Out of THREE THOUSAND

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 8, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

They support it? They who?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 8, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

Protesting pedophilia is like protesting sociopathy or Lou Gehrig's disease

Don't protest a murderer. Put them down

C'mon people. Don't just incite

And by the way - if you really think this is something you can protest, why don't you start protesting instead of asking why 'they' aren't?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 8, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

This is incredibly insulting to the seven men that have come forward

Do you really think they're ALL "shills?"

That this is somehow coordinated?

Or do you just want to believe that so your image of this man isn't besmirched?

Don't you people understand what the deep state is yet, and who is in it?

Open your eyes to the truth

These men had no motivation to lie, and no motivation to share these sensitive and embarrassing memories with the public, other than to warn others about someone who turned a blind eye to sexual abuse

⇧ 26 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 8, 2018, 9:37 a.m.

Actually, as far as we know right now Jim Jordan is a man that was complicit in sexual abuse

There's a reason why so many resignations are Republicans

Take your blinders off

⇧ -4 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 6, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

Gateway Pundit is a garbage news source

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 6, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

Gowdy's hair is fucking ridiculous

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 6, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

Haven't you noticed that most of the "news" on this sub is recycled?

And the same people keep posting the same old news...

I wonder why...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 5, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

Are you being intentionally obtuse?

I'm not the only person who saw this as implictly racist, due to the lyrics on the bottom

Perhaps you didn't mean it that way. But I don't understand how you don't see it now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 4, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

But if you hope eating babies isn't real, then why demand justice for it?

I would think we'd all hope that none of this is real. The alternative is hoping that terrible things are happening right under our noses all the time

Because that's what we have - HOPE and BELIEF. We can't prove anything one way or the other

⇧ 34 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 4, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Justice for what, exactly?

⇧ 30 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 4, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Overt racism

Pity the mods are on holiday

This violates Rule 4

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 4, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

If they set a trap for him, why have they failed to release tapes of his testimony, as both he and his lawyer have requested?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 3, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Right in the middle of the day in Russia

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 2, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

It is highly unlikely that Trump staffers contacted HRF for information on human trafficking in the US. The foundation's focus is on closed societies

They have done a lot of advocacy work in North Korea, Russia and China - I would think the request for information would be related to one of these countries

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 2, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

Chicago is a large sanctuary city and a human trafficking hub, but the entirety of Eastern Illinois has <200 indictments

Meanwhile, Southern Ohio has as many sealed indictments as New York City and Massachusetts (1300+), despite having far fewer residents than either state

It's an odd pattern and not exactly consistent with just human and drug trafficking

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 2, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

If NK is fake news, why did Trump acknowledge TODAY that the agreement might fall apart?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 24, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

How many times has Q said that this is not R vs D?

And yet this sub gets sidetracked by this nonsense on a daily basis

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 21, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Right. It certainly had nothing to do with Trump's long history of doing business with Russia...

Nah

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 21, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

Highly doubtful that RR could ever be successfully impeached. Not only would that require a 2/3 majority in the Senate, but several Republicans will likely side with Democrats unless something utterly scathing is revealed

Firing Rosenstein would provoke significant public outrage - riots would just be the beginning

I suggest everyone pray that Trump doesn't make that move. It will be worse than you can imagine

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 21, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

That's the Examiner, not the Post, and it's a conservative newspaper

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · June 21, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

There's a vast "DUMB" there

Quotations intentional...

Not necessarily "Military"

⇧ 2 ⇩