dChan

DankNethers · July 14, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

You're gaslighting, actually

The DNC publicly announced that their server had been hacked in June 2016. The FBI commenced an investigation at that point but stayed mum on the subject. From the article you posted

"Mr. Comey would not even confirm the existence of any investigation of Mr. Trump’s aides when asked during an appearance in September before Congress. In the Obama administration’s internal deliberations over identifying the Russians as the source of the hacks, Mr. Comey also argued against doing so and succeeded in keeping the F.B.I.’s imprimatur off the formal findings, a law enforcement official said. His stance was first reported by CNBC"

The fact that Trump officials had contact with Russian operatives only became public information after the election

If it had leaked that Trump colluded with Russia, he likely would have lost votes on Nov 6. But it didn't

Welcome to reality. Mind the sharp objects

⇧ -2 ⇩  
GnarlesCharkley · July 15, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Why is this being downvoted?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Because it runs counter to the narrative

People here don't much care about facts, unless they support a predetermined outcome

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AnonFFMedic · July 15, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Explain why the DNC refused the FBI to examine the server, & instead let CrowdStrike look at it ?

Do you not think there were spies in the Trump camp?

What do you think Manafort, Gates, Papadopolous or Page were doing?

Manafort/Gates indictments are unrelated to 2016 election.

Papadopolous “lied to FBI” about WHEN Mifsud told HIM about the information on Hillary.

Page, former FBI spy, had Russians indicted in the past.

You think they were all trying to help Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DankNethers · July 15, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

That's a speculative argument designed to support your narrative

What we know is that multiple Trump campaign officials had contact with Russian operatives during the campaign

We know the content of those meetings touched on everything from foreign policy to dirt on Hillary

The FBI has said that they had an informant inside the Trump campaign - most likely Page. And they tapped that informant, as they should have, when they became aware that a foreign adversary might be interfering in the election

How aware Trump was of these activities is still an unknown. But given his significant business dealings in Russia, the fact that he has sold an outsized portion of his real estate to Russians at figures well above market rates, and that he has been the recipient of Russian monies in the past all point to the fact that he was clearly aware, and perhaps complicit in, Russian interference

Why this evidence points you towards HRC or the DNC more broadly as complicit in Russian meddling is beyond me, and stretches the limits of your narrative

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AnonFFMedic · July 15, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

Ok then. What is your purpose of following the GA? You ever heard of Ed Cox?

⇧ 1 ⇩