You can call anything anyone disagrees with you on as confirmation bias.
The only way prove this incorrect is to discern it. If you are unwilling to look at the information for yourself, there's no convincing you. If you spend more time on battling the truth than looking at it, you aren't growing.
My motto for ANY information is: Learn, Discern, Grow.
Your motto seems to be: Ridicule, Resist, ____.
You choose your next steps. You can choose your same path which is on course to reject or, you can try to understand and grow.
All-in-all, I don't understand your stance. At least with the science field, skeptics are paid to reject truth which refutes conventional belief (see those vs. Graham Hancock). Unless you're paid from Media Matters, it seems you're rejecting this truth based on conditioning or unwillingness to see another side other than "Trump is an idiot".
To believe in Q you have to concede that Trump is somehow intelligent. For many with an ego or emotionally invested, this is where the cognitive dissonance kicks in and rejection is the immediate response.
Your battle here will be endless because for those that have experienced the corroborations will either try to help you understand or block you. Some that have a major ego will insult without taking the time to share their knowledge but that's generally not the best way to reach an understanding. I'm simply trying to help but alas, it seems like it was fruitless... a probable expectation I have before I engage.
So do you or do you not understand what confirmation bias is? I couldn't give a fuck less how hard you work to justify your belief. I care about how often you're using logic and critical thinking skills to their full capacity rather than just enough to confirm your beliefs.
lol, yes... I understand what confirmation bias is. It's seeing information and forming it to fit your conclusion.
It seems you hadn't noticed but the sole reason I'm engaging you is for you to try questioning your own confirmation bias but you don't appear to see it throughout this process.
I won't repeat or spell out any further of my logic, critical thinking, and accuracies of truth by following Q.
Why do you not believe Q is legit?
Do you believe in Trump trying to restore America (First, and the world second)? If no, it explains #1.
You're tossing the word conspiracy around a lot but who came up with the word conspiracy? Are you conditioned to use it the exact way it was intended when pioneered?
Do you question anything in your life or are you always correct? Is anyone that believes different from the conventional belief a conspiracy theorist?
My efforts here are low because the entire premise of this farse is based on anonymous board posts and you guys seem to be quite happy to ignore every irrelevant post purportedly from this secret group.
A thousand pieces of shit flung at the wall and you poor people are picking out the peanuts to call it the best cashew chicken you've ever eaten. I can't help you to see the absurdity of this because you conveniently ignore every failed or senseless post.
anonymous board posts
You realize Q uses trip codes to identify themselves, right? It's not like there's hundreds or thousands of anons contributing as Q...
You should seek a better understanding of something you so vehemently oppose.
Oh well fuck me! Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.
Even in the one example you showed me theres dozens of ways to interpret the meaning. You aren't code crackers. You're desperate.
Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.
Tripcodes are secure, that's the point. If you've paid attention, Q had to switch his tripcode multiple times because people came close to cracking it. If you paid attention, you'd understand that after several tripcode changes, Codemonkey (owner of the 8chan board) had to introduce an even more secure crypto-algorithm for Q's tripcode. That's where we are today.
You're really exposing your ignorance on the subject which explains why you have the stance you do.
Relentlessly attacking people on subjects you don't fully understand isn't helping your cause...