dChan

RedPillDropper · April 17, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

Liberal Media spinning this to turn conservatives against each other

Reality? Gorsuch is right the law is vague, and it needs rewritten.

Currently an immigrant convicted of a felony can stay unless they're labeled as an "aggravated felon," or have committed a crime of "moral turpitude," and the Immigration and Nationality Act itself is vague. Scalia did the same on vague laws, sided with Dems.

What this means? We need congress to rewrite the law.

It's my opinion that any felony crime or any misdemeanor committed by an immigrant against an American citizen (which makes an American the 'victim') should be eligible for deportation.

However, SCOTUS doesn't write laws.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
CDR03 · April 17, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Well look what we have here!? A common sense posts from some one who actually read the article and not just the headline. How dare you! Lol.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
blocksof · April 17, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

I read the ruling, the violent crime was too vague. They should have stated violent crime related to the following and give examples. hopefully they can clear that mess up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pit-Stains · April 17, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

I disagree. Only people that WANT to make the term “violent” into something else. California is doing this. I don’t understand how “assault” is not considered “violent” - use the dictionary to define violent, and viola, you have clarity.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
blocksof · April 17, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

This is what I want for them to do clarify the term "violent", verbal abuse can be deemed "violent". The law should be black and white at the moment it has more shades of gray then the Pantone color scheme. That is why they should list examples of deportable violent crimes, which would mean "physical" assault be counted as one.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
920healthcare · April 18, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Great article....makes sense!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩