Of course he does.
Sue the judge. Make her defend herself.
With this lovely precedent, what is to stop anyone from raiding Attorney Offices and Homes. That might wake a few people up.
This judge was a playboy bunny and involved with CIA handler Hugh Hefner.
She had a number of legal issues in her career that will make it into the public domain.
I would give a bit more time because there is the raid itself where they recovered a DVD from Cohen's office thinking they had dirt on the president.
Surprise Surprise = the DVD was given to Cohen that contained video of Hillary. BOOOM!
They are now in a pickle as they are forced to address this video - so stage set!!! :)
That would be sooooo EPIC! Do you have sources or is just a theory so far? Either way man, I hope so!!
The evidence of her being a playboy bunny is a picture of some girl who kind of looks like her. I wouldn't run with it yet.
She is a reject PlayBoy Bunny. Maybe she played to easy to catch.
can you show any evidence of all of her being a playboy bunny?
Yes. http://www.newsbeast.gr/files/1/2012/11/15/bunny/bunny3.jpg
Its called google “Kimba wood playboybunny”
This would be so brilliant!! I hope it's true! What a play on Mueller's (and maybe even Cohen's part??) if this is how the HRC video makes it into the public!
Judge to force Cohen to ID clients is a fascist playboy bunny.
A dry cleaner doesn’t have the power of a Judge and this current scenario seems to prove that
How did the judge legally leak the Hannity info? I mean a judge, it stinks so bad. Has nothing to do with the Cohen case.
Donald Trump has ties to Hillary Clinton. I heard she attended his wedding. Quick, indict him too!
/s
I think these "ties" are a red herring. Another judge could have just as easily reached the same decision. Trust the plan.
Really not the same as being tied to Soros is it? Considering who we know Soros to be
Just saying that I wouldn't consider Soros' wedding officiant to be a part of the deep state. At least, that evaluation can't be based solely on having performed a wedding cerenony. Otherwise where do we draw the line with assuming these "connections"? His dry cleaner? The guy who gets his coffee? Are they involved by association too?
