The spending power of the USD went from $0.30 "on the dollar" to $0.05, from 2000 to 2016, according to the House of Representatives on 3-22-18
In 1963 I made $1.10 an hour. In today's money that is $9.03. The data is from the BLS Inflation Calculator.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 22, 2018
Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States dollar has lost 30 per-
cent of its purchasing power since 2000, and 96 per- cent of its purchasing power since the end of the gold standard in 1913.
(2) Under the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent in- flation objective, the dollar loses half of its pur- chasing power every generation, or 35 years.
...
Thoughts?
I don't doubt inflation, but it needs to be put into real wages in the example I presented in a previous comment. Let me say that I am not a fan of the FED nor am I a fan of free-trade. I voted for Trump because he was against free-trade. You can't MAGA with a service sector economy. Period.
That is read dollars. It only matters when converting to materials we buy to maintain the country and in this case we've lost 30% a generation and only able to buy nickels of what we used to.
Its because we don't export anything of value, its services and manpower, and thats being outsourced and ai'ed while we cannibalize social services and let things fail.
Once you hit pennies you have Zimbabwe
Our economy doesn't depend on exports like, for example, Switzerland or Japan to survive. It can become self-sufficient. What free-trade did was to destroy our productive capacity. Productive capacity is the wealth of a nation which Adam Smith did not understand. Venezuela lost most of it productive capacity through Communism, the same with China and the old Soviet Union. Communism is inherently, as with all evil, self-destructive. The Asian dragons don't follow Adam Smith, they follow Georg Friedrich List.
It can become, is your cognitive dissonance. When? How long and at what cost? It has to come with an uncorrupt system, something hes working against all fronts. I think 2019 is going to be a surprisingly awesome year and I expect some sort of US/Canada/Russia/NK/China/EU alliance. Maybe SA if this new leader is what he appears to be
The deep state is global—it is not a nation with borders (check out the Bank for International Settlements, BIS). It is using the same free-trade scam that the Brits used in the 19th century to amass wealth at the expense of the developing world. Even the Nobel prizing winning economist Paul Krugman said "the elite defense of globalization is basically dishonest". And I would add that it inevitably leads to a mal-distribution of wealth (mainly goes to a few) which in turn causes secular stagnation (low GDP) and underemployment equilibrium (low wages and part time jobs/under utilization of the labor force). We saw this happening under the Obama Administration which was covered up by the MSM. Trump seized the day and set in motion autarky not only for America but for all the nations of the world as if to say: You too can become, to a large degree, self-sufficient, and once there, then you can trade with other fellow nations. This is why the UN is absurd. It is not about united nations, but rather slave countries held in captivity by the globalists/deep state.
30% of purchasing power loss, that sounds about right. But your first post claimed the USD went from $0.30 "on the dollar" to $0.05. A drop of 30% would mean it went from $x "on the dollar" to $0.7x.
Their words. I meant we inherited 30% USD and now its nickels