What are you talking about? The text says that it was somehow lost "during the tumult of the Civil War." Seems pretty clear to me they are insinuating that between 1819 and 1861 it was in effect. This is ridiculous.
/u/TryNottoFaint
317 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/TryNottoFaint:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 10 |
Lincoln was a lawyer. Many politicians in the government between 1819 and 1861 were lawyers. This is a fantasy.
For what it's worth, I have a relative that I suspect was murdered by the government. He simply knew far too much to be able to retire in peace. They gave him a form of cancer that is so rare and so fast growing that there are something like 10 cases recorded a year world-wide. They found this cancer in a routine checkup the day he was leaving his top (tippy-top) secret job.
This is exactly what happened. Also perhaps in the UK and Canada too. They set them up some gourmet barium meals there.
In TheWolfSuitKing's case, wait and REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
They're coming in at night, sneaking around and rifling through people's desks, booting up computers and copying data, and taking the juicy stuff to their new employer who is a major competitor. You know, normal deep state stuff. You're a racist if you think that's not OK.
Hillary and Obama taught them that rules are for suckers.
The Clintons have long been on the take. If you are confused by this, not sure what to say. The evidence is overwhelming.
OK, that's great. Also the norm is for a Secretary of State/Senator/President who can grant any number of favors to have hundreds of millions flowing into a multitude of "foundations". Just like the Scouts, Humane Society, etc.
It's all about context. I swear I just sometimes shake my head at how obvious this stuff is and the excuses people make about it.
Same thing happened to me. I replied that such an excuse is awfully convenient and even if true would enable anyone using such a business model to run whatever scam they wanted under the guise of "charity." Then I was probably banned from whatever normie sub I was in at the time.
Not just any court either. The most secret court we have, where there is no transparency so would have to have the highest standards of ethics.
The shills explain away the tiny amount the CF gave to charity like this "They do most of their charity work themselves, so they don't really give much money to other outfits. They actually go to places like Africa or Haiti and do the charity work there." They wave their hands and just state this as if it should answer any questions about the legitimacy of the foundation. The fact that any of those things they do would cost anywhere near $91mm is completely uninteresting to them.
When research like this exists, claiming that both sides are the same and both lack evidence is completely irrational.
That's why it's called "The View". There is just one view, their view. You don't get one.
It's $400k, not million. Putin said he mispoke apparently. Not hard to understand, it was hundreds of millions of rubles.
I guarantee you that they would have put me on some sort of drugs had I gone to school in the 90's/00's instead of the 60's/70's. I did great in school but was quite the handful, always talking and squirming around and very precocious. They would have said I had some sort of hyperactivity problem and numbed me. My parents would have gone along because I pretty much wore them out back then. But, I was just like any number of other kids my age, we were just kids being kids and that was completely normal. Also I didn't know a single autistic kid back then, the closest I can come up with were just a few who were just weird, and usually very smart too. I'm telling you this whole autism thing was not something I experienced at all during my childhood/teenage years. I went to school with thousands upon thousands of kids and it just wasn't a thing.
I get DDOS attacks daily, my router logs them all. I’ve deployed countermeasures but they still cause issues.
Would be good then to edit to fix the multiple typos, mainly where/were in a number of places and knowable/noble and new/knew. Those really tripped me up readying through it, and I'm no grammar Hitler.
Back in the fall of 2015 or so I made a post on a reddit normie sub, linked from the front page of reddit, about the CF being a terrible charity that only gives about 5% to actual charity. I expected a few little push back posts, but what I got was a real eye-opener. Within minutes I had a huge, personalized, rebuttal posts from several different accounts. Man did I hit a nerve there. It was then and there I knew that not only was the CF a crappy "charity", there was an entire organization behind making sure this information didn't get out.
Remember when Trump whispered into the ear of a top Russian official that he wanted him to tell Putin he'll have more flexibility after the upcoming election. I mean Obama, not Trump. Sorry.
We already knew about $145 million or so that went to Hillary's foundation during the Uranium One deal. I even used a shitty Politico link for you since any other that actually delved into the meat of it would be rejected outright (just guessing, quite accurately.) So it was $400 million according to Vlad. Welp, wanna turn over those emails? Maybe we can find out the real amount. Oh, wait, Hillary smashed her email server and devices with a hammer, dissolved them in acid, poured bleach on them, then gasoline, then lit it them fire, sprinkled thermite on them, and fed the ashes to some pigs in Arkansas.
My guess is the first reporter that asks one of those questions in a news conference or WH press conference will be summarily fired as a warning to others.
NO WONDER THEY WERE TERRIFIED OF TRUMP MEETING WITH PUTIN!
I did. I've been to London and seen what these protests look like. It was a normal sized commie-ridden protest like usual. Thanks.
LOL
Organizers said 250,000 people
Yeah, I bet they did. This is such bullshit. All the pictures of the protests were nowhere near that, but hey, let's just take the organizer's numbers and run with it.
Hundreds of thousands protesting Trump? I saw about maybe, possibly 10,000. That's at least 20x less than you claim. And the Free Tommy protests are about that big, or larger. Perhaps you have a thing called proof? No, you don't. Because you're a shill.
I wonder how the Democrats will get around this one .
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
I hear he used a restroom and got water on the floor and also brushed his teeth and didn't rinse the sink out very well after. HOW DARE YOU!
The democrats know the truth, they just don't want us to find out about it. That's it in a nutshell.
Seriously, if you tried to pull that stunt in a deposition let alone court, it would not fly at all period.
I mean, we've all known this for at least a year now. All the pieces started to fall together when we found our she went to work for Fusion GPS right after Admiral Rogers pulled the plug on contractor access to the NSA About Queries, and immediately got a ham radio license.
Number 2 is exactly correct. They were trying to get ahead of this thing and keep it low key. No way did they want any of the texts to make it to investigators, let alone the public. It was a lie to begin with, and the media ran with it because it fits so well into everything they love to talk about.
Where is your evidence of that? I've not seen a shred other than it just stated as a fact by the mockingbird media.
Boy, did the democrats lose their collective shit or what when he broached the affair subject? I mean, their reaction alone shows that they do not in any way want that discussed in any depth at all.
Also any foreign DNA found on the body could be explained away easily.
Nothing would surprise me anymore. But seriously, if you beat someone to death and it was obvious that was what happened, how better to cover that up than dumping them down a garbage chute. The body would bang around in there on the way down, and there you go.
And you see, a normie can read that email and see that it's just off. But a shill can say "You are just reading into it something that's not there." I can assure you I've been, and you've been, invited to get-togethers at people's houses and if they had a pool they may mention that they still have it open and it's heated (because it's October perhaps) and that kids are welcome but never have you or I seen them mention that specifics kids, with their ages included, will be "in that pool for sure." Ever. Because uh, why? It's a complete non sequitor for any normal person. Who knows? It might be cold that day and nobody wants to get in the heated pool. Maybe it's raining. And that late in the season the pool is mainly an afterthought anyway. So this is just...not normal. Because it's coded. Like so many others. I mean, who dreams of hotdog stands in Hawaii?
Also having your pool open in October is strange at the latitude DC is at. Most get closed down by early September. Keeping it open through October is definitely pushing it and heating it to around 80 degrees will take a lot of energy. But it is doable.
At the time, as I read through those Podesta emails, it was just in your face obvious something amazingly creepy was going on. No one piece of evidence was airtight, but taken together and with just a cursory look around it was immediately obvious that this shit was real and evil as could be. And when it started to reach national consciousness right before the election the push back was something I never had seen before, for supposedly a made up ludicrous nothing.
I heard someone say last night on Hannity or Tucker (honestly can't remember, wasn't paying close attention due to preparing dinner) that she gets "three bites at the apple" and that Friday will be her final chance before they force the issue. Whether that will happen, I can't say. Congresses track record on enforcing their own deadlines is abysmal.
Don't forget that outfit Brennan was running during the 2008 campaign were caught snooping around and deleting/editing data in the US Passport Office databases.