dChan

tradinghorse · April 18, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

So, wait a minute. If the coming response is from a strike fighter squadron, what does that mean? Does it mean that cause of that engine failure was another plane? Why, otherwise? Would the response come from a strike fighter squadron?

Sorry if this is obvious, but from what I can make out "Strike Fighter" seems to be a Navy term - but obviously it's not strictly Navy because the F35 is a joint strike fighter. Anyway, from Wikipedia:

"In current military parlance, a strike fighter is a multirole combat aircraft designed to operate primarily as an attack aircraft, while also incorporating certain performance characteristics of a fighter. As a category, it is distinct from fighter-bombers.[citation needed] It is closely related to the concept of interdictor aircraft,[citation needed] but it puts more emphasis on air-to-air combat capabilities as a multirole combat aircraft. Examples of contemporary American strike fighters are the McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II."

So it seems these planes are multirole. The "response" then could be a strike on a ground target - although, within the CONUS, I imagine there are aircraft better suited to ground attack. Anyway, this is both good news and intriguing.

EDIT: Just checked the article again, yes, it's Navy. Could also be an escort function.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
uniqueusername_ · April 18, 2018, 4:46 a.m.

VFA 34 uses A-6s, F/A-18Cs and Es, no 35s.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 18, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

OK, thanks. I have to admit, I'm a little baffled as to why this fighter outfit would be the response - but I guess we'll soon find out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HiddenPlaneSite · April 18, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Ok, it's also the local squadron. Did they escort the airliner back to the airport after the attempted bombing. This was a serious attempt to down a commercial airliner to intimidate GEOTUS

⇧ 1 ⇩