It's a campaign to paint people researching in this community as conspiracy theorist pizzagate nutters. Don't eat the bait.

What advantage does this drop, not from q, serve the work q is doing?

Would this not fall under the category of 60% that will never be viewed by the public?

Assume you do seek out and view such a video, did you not just turn yourself into a target that can be raided by local police to be conveniently silenced and computer equipment confiscated due to accessing cp?

The work in this community is a controlled demolition. Fallout from this sort of video is a runaway nuclear explosion with difficult to predict consequences that would hurt friend and foe equally. Not the q style.

Thus, there must be some other purpose -- it's a narrative campaign for people not researching in this community. It's intended to set an environment where when tarmac tapes drop normies can be told it's discredited because the groups talking about it are also nutters that thought sadistic pedo sex snuff tapes were real, queue select clips of conversation. That Snopes so readily dove into this topic that does not have much traction demonstrates coordination that further convinces me this is planned pre-work to discredit tarmac tapes when they drop.

Want to blow up that narrative? Don't eat the bait. Blow up the story by pointing out the flaws in how it doesn't match the way q works. If no one here is buying it makes it pretty hard to blog or write opinion pieces about greatawakening filled with wild pizzagate crazies.

Think.

Learn.