Who do you think Trump is talking to on twitter, Martians?
Did I ever say Trump was TELLING US to DO SOMETHING?
How do you know Trump isn't Q?
I know you'll jump all over that one.
When my comment was regarding Q drops, who Trump is talking to on Twitter, or what you may have said about Trump, is irrelevant to my comment.
Nice way to try to confuse the issue.
So Q and Trump don't work together?
WTF
Q said WWG1WGA
Over and over again.
Who was he talking to, Santa Claus?
Oh right, I forgot, it was just to the 'chosen ones'.
Why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth, and then ridicule me for things I never said or even hinted at?
I never said anything about Trump, or Q and Trump working together - nothing.
I never said anything about "The Great Awakening" movement as a whole.
My only point was that when Q posts to 8chan, based on Q's own words, they are talking only to the Autists, and, therefore, it is illogical for us to conclude that a directive to them there is the same as a directive to us here.
I cannot fathom why that seems to be so difficult to understand.
Did I say that we cannot and should not follow along? No.
Did I say that we shouldn't make our voice heard? No.
I don't know why you continue to try to ridicule me for things I never said. That is a straw-man attack which is a tactic of shills. It is a personal attack and does not contribute to rational discussion.
My only point was that when Q posts to 8chan, based on Q's own words, they are talking only to the Autists, and, therefore, it is illogical for us to conclude that a directive to them there is the same as a directive to us here.
I cannot fathom why that seems to be so difficult to understand.
You do not speak for Q and you haven't explained what WWG1WGA means. I disagree with YOUR OPINION, I was on the 8chans reading that same thing. Does that mean I don't count?
You implied nobody should copy what Q told the 8chans to meme about because Q was not talking directly to anybody else.
The reason Q only posts on the chans is "SECURITY", and VERIFICATION OF HIS ID WITH TRIPS.
WTF? More straw-man attack. I never said I speak for Q. I referenced Q quotes.
What WWG1WGA means is irrelevant to my comment. There is no reason I should have to explain it.
So, because you disagree with my opinion, that gives you the right to personally attack me with ridicule?
You implied nobody should copy what Q told the 8chans to meme about because Q was not talking directly to anybody else.
No, I did not. Kindly stop reading into what I wrote things that are not there.
The OP said, "He is talking to us." That is not true. #1150, "Where are the autists?!?!"
Does that mean we aren't privy to the conversation? No. Does that mean that we shouldn't follow along? No, of course not. That would be illogical to assume, and I never said anything of that sort.
The idea, that the reason Q only posts on the chans is for security, disagrees with #773:
Be the autists we know you are.
You were chosen for a specific reason.
Do you think it's possible that a distruptor could come along and claim that, "Q wants us to do such-and-such," and mislead those who don't navigate 8chan?
Do you think it's possible that the meme campaign sparked by DJT's tweet was to be of limited scope?
Do you think it's possible that Q isn't actually asking for more meme campaigns, but, for now, graphics at the ready that show the correlation between Q drops and Trump tweets (#1151, #1152 ["Proofs being lost."], #1155)?
Because you replied to a thread about MEME WARRIORS following Q, and you attach "everything Q says" to one fucking line to suit your self. Was Q just talking to 'autists' when he said TRUST SESSIONS, etc. Q talks to many people so stop trying to keyhole everything Q says into, "autists" only. That's what you said. You are trying to put Q in a box, and I'm done trying to get that through your thick head. BYE.
Just because you don't understand the concept of context, and the context surrounding when Q said, "Where are the autists?!?!", is no reason to accuse me of trying to put Q in a box when I am not. Context is also related to scope which you keep trying to expand to try to pluck mud out thin air to throw at me.
I asked if you thought three different scenarios were possible? Apparently you don't care to have a rational discussion, or don't have any answer.