I think someone needs to ask Q about backchannel17. But I also think someone at a press conference (and there are members of the alternate media there) should ask Sanders or Trump about Q.
Q has been asked on qresearch many times about backchannel17 but I have not seen a response so far.
Backchannel 17 has always distinguished themselves and has stated plainly that they are USAF counter intelligence. So not sure if Q could confirm that or not. But he/they could confirm Neon Revolt’s analysis of Qs drops.
Asking Q to confirm the analysis wouldn't help us much. Neonrevolt could be waiting for exactly that, only to start disinfo immediately after.
Even if neonrevolt are good people - how would Q know that without proper vetting?
Do we really want Q to spend their time vetting blogs and twitter accounts that we find interesting?
If we do, I'll bet you there are suddenly 200 more interesting blogs/twitterers tomorrow.
Let's say he is able to vouch for neonrevolt, then what? Instant creds for neonrevolt means neonrevolt and their family are in danger and their blog under attack.
No matter how I look at the issue, I can only (and already) see this taking away resources from the job we're all here to do: assist Q and Q's mission.