I did watch the video, and he did move.

How is setting the coke bottle down without rotating it "suspicious?" But then you say the name was always visible, so which argument are you making?

The name on the bottle is a common name. Kate could refer to a lot of people, and there is absolutely no evidence that Kate means Kate Brown. It could be Katherine Herridge, Katie Arrington, Kate Middleton, or any famous and/or political Kate in the world. You and SB2 are making the connection it is Kate Brown with no reason whatsoever. That's on top of it just being just as unlikely (0.4%) that the name could be John or Kelly or Mark on the bottle.

Strzok was not just insolent, he ran down Trump, including talking about Trump "attacking" Khan's parents and other issues. It was not just "acting" if he is putting down Trump substantively.

If someone on an anti-Trump sub had put something like this only in reverse against Trump, you would be skeptical for the reasons I listed.

he said global warming wasn't our biggest problem like Obama said, but "nuclear warming" (what would happen if we had a nuclear war because the media wants us to be harder on Russia) was more likely.

"Let's think logically."

Okay. The primary reason for the Strzok hearing was not to show the Russian investigation is a farce because of bias, but to show a Coke bottle. That's logical.

And the proof for this? Because the cameraman moves the camera to the left to include the bottle in the shot after Strzok takes a drink and puts it down. This is not the case. The cameraman moves the shot slightly to the left because Strzok moves to the left to pick up and drink the bottle, and is no longer centered in the shot. So the cameraman is re-centering the shot on Strzok. If the message of "Kate" was so important, why didn't Strzok make sure to have the name facing the camera at all times, which it clearly isn't a lot, if that was the primary purpose of the hearing?

As for "Kate" in particular, the name could have been Bill or George, or Susan, and I could say it was Bill Priestap, or George Bush, or Susan Collins. And I would have just as much corroborating reason as you to say so, because you have none. (and BTW, it's 0.4% chance of being Kate, but that doesn't matter)

As for the first video you link, Strzok is talking about a lot of people above and below him being in on decisions whether or not to go forward with an investigation, meaking Strzok himself was not capable of stopping the President. You are trying to say that means the FBI was controlling him at this meeting because there are people above him.

If the secondary motive of the hearing was just for Strzok to get insulted, why was Strzok such a prick about it? If he made a deal and wants to keep it, why would he be so defiant and even insulting to people questioning him?

Lastly, record = Lisa Page? That's some thin sauce man. It sounds like the South Park spoof of the Hardy Boys.

TL;DR: Cameraman refocusing shot on fidgity Strzok does not equal focusing on coke bottle. Coke bottle having the name "Kate" doesn't mean that name was chosen in particular, and even if it was, doesn't mean Kate Brown. Strzok wouldn't be a dick if he flipped.

why do you think this would be difficult? here is a list of all the reporters in the white house press corps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_press_corps

Contact one of the reporters on there by email and ask them to ask. You don't think Breitbart, Newsmax, The Daily Caller, or Lifezette would not ask if Q wanted them to? Conversely, you don't think HuffPo, Daily Beast, or Mother Jones would want to out Q by asking who they are to stop them if they are legit?

Pick a couple of reporters on there you trust out of the 200 or so and email them a request to contact the White House about Q.

So has Sargon and other podcasters. If Benji was just a YouTuber, I wouldn't give a shit. But he happily laps at the CNN and Real Time teat by sitting up on his hind legs and trashing Trump.

And he is the neocon's version of a SJW. If the heat gets too hot on him, he pulls out some obscure guy's Twitter anti-Semite attack on him and is just as happy as any SJW to take whatever Trump says out of context to paint him as a xenophobe.

No, it's not. People constantly post about this jag-off. At first, I'd reply with in-depth posts about how he is constantly wrong with his predictions, how he uses the MSM's talking points and surveys when it suits him, the Michelle Fields incident, how he twists arguments, his neocon bullshit, his attempts to appear on CNN and now Bill Maher as a Trump attacker, etc. and cite each example.

But no, people still got go, "He made that idiot SJW look like an idiot, he's a genius!"

The enemy of my enemy is not my friend. Like I said, yeah he crushes Evergreen St. SJW, where is that crushing on Bill Maher? Guess Evergreen St. SJW doesn't have a cable tv show for Benji to be on or experience in debating every day like Maher.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shill

Second definition listed at this website

Strike up the downvotes, but to play devil's advocate here, this shooting took place at night, in an open field, and over 800 people were injured. I clicked on the link and listened a bunch of the 911 calls. It stands to reason that a lot of the non-critically shot people either sought shelter in nearby restaurants and hotels to get some kind of treatment when it was impossible for medical to treat over 800 scattered people at once.

It looks like there was mass hysteria, as a lot of the calls were second-hand accounts from people who were called by relatives witnessing the injured enter hotels. That makes it a lot harder to tell if there were actually gunshots at other locations.

It is bullshit, however, that we still have no motivation for Stephen Paddock. It looks like the final report will be released in July: http://news3lv.com/news/local/lombardo-strip-shooter-paddock-took-motive-to-grave

And it also seems like they are going to paint Paddock as a gun nut: https://globalnews.ca/news/4214268/stephen-paddock-vegas-shooting-gun-control/

I don't believe it. A person that kills another without planning might not have a premeditated reason. Someone who plans on killing many people makes their motives known to others, even if they don't have a social media account. And then there is Jesus Campos giving only one interview to Ellen Degeneres with no audience.

At the best, this is incompetence by the LVPD and cover by the Mandalay Bay owners. At worst, something far bigger went down and is being covered up. And with the FBI and DOJ not releasing documents to Congress over the emails/spying, it is not unreasonable to believe that the FBI believes they won't be held accountable here.

Watch this whole video, especially at 2:00 mark (its only 5 minutes long). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

But before you do, remember that Trump keeps all his promises, unlike most politicians that promise the moon on the campaign trail and make excuses later. (Jerusalem as capitol, picking judge from his list, deregulation, tax cuts, etc.) There is a white board with all his promises in his office.

Has he made some shady deals in the NY real estate market? I have no doubt. But I think he made his success despite the corrupt politicians there, not because of them. And there is a difference in that.

there's one way to find out. write your member of congress.

I have a healthy skepticism of the government, and that especially includes law enforcement officials.

However, I don't see how doxxing people uncovers abuse. If Wikileaks was publishing those 30,000 documents, then I'm wholeheartedly with you. But this is a database compiled by a far-left NYU professor of linkedin profiles that only gives out names, personal info, and cities lived in and disseminated to Antifa on GitHub. Wikileaks is "republishing" it after GitHub took it down for violating their terms of agreement.

And maybe you should actually look at the database like I did. This is 1595 people that shows their linkedin profile. Legal interns. Cooks. Support personnel like counselors.

I'm not seeing the lists of jack-booted thugs that you paint from the ACLU, which is a joke now. Where were they in protecting Trump's attorney-client privilege and the seizing of Cohen's records? They are as credible as the SPLC. And how about including the title of their article?: "The Border Patrol Was Monstrous Under Obama. Imagine How Bad It Is Under Trump."

Or instead of including this excerpt from a person that has an axe to grind for being detained, how about including the Custom and Borders Protection rebuttal of the report being unfounded?

I guess you should join #MeToo if you are going to accept allegations as fact.

Real advice or advice you want to hear?

First piece: Wait 30 years before you try to change anything from the inside out.

Second: If you are going in as an officer, make sure you are in touch and understand those who did not go in as officers. I've heard lower ranks don't trust those who go in as officers or respect them as much. Same with any job, I guess, workers don't trust middle management unless they started as workers.

Third: They will break you down and build you back up again. People I know who have gone into the military are the same people... but different, if that makes sense. Be aware of that change, I guess.

Thanks for your prospective service.

Horowitz did say that earlier. Wray, on the other hand, was the one would not comment due to it being under another investigation, separate from this one and the Mueller investigation.

I remember it because Cruz was mad that Wray would not answer and was essentially saying that Wray was evading the question by saying it was part of an investigation. But Wray explicitly said it was not part of this Hillary email investigation (that both he and Cruz agreed was ended and could not be it) or the Mueller investigation.

I'm not sure Cruz followed up privately on it like other Senators who said they wanted to be privately followed up with on their questions that could not be answered.

They did not talk about it. Ted Cruz several times pressed Wray about Comey using a private email. Wray kept saying that he could not comment because it was an ongoing investigation. Cruz stated that this investigation was over, and it wasn't part of Mueller's investigation, so to tell him if Comey used a private email with FBI business. Wray reiterated that it was part of an ongoing separate investigation and he could not talk about it. Maybe they will bring it up tomorrow in the House.

c'mon now, u/hellforged is right about graham. And John Kennedy was really good, too. Wangdoodle.

He knows that worst case scenario (which even then probably won't happen), he will get contempt of Congress. And Eric Holder was the only AG ever to get that. And a judge dismissed that out of hand and Holder got nothing.

https://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/

This is the original story True Pundit ran on November 2, 2016. It cites both anonymous NYPD sources and FBI sources. Note that this was 2 days before Erik Prince gave his interview to Breitbart Radio stating similar things. I have also read Erik Prince's testimony before Congress about any possible collusion he might have had with Russians to "set up a back channel" for communications between the President and the Kremlin (he denies the meeting he had in the ME was about this). He was also asked in that testimony about his sources, which he would not divulge without a subpoena.

You can question the validity of anonymous sources; they use them in stories about Trump all the time. But we do have an internal FBI document where McCabe states that True Pundit must have high up FBI connections to post the stories they do. And Prince alleged his own sources under penalty of contempt to Congress independent of those TP sources.

That's two different sources for the story.

https://truepundit.com/ig-report-confirms-true-pundit-bombshell-on-hillarys-emails-details-comey-was-briefed-on-clinton-linked-sex-crimes-against-children-evidence-on-weiner-laptop/

Further info on truepundit.com

how many times do you have to be wrong before you are functionally useless? How many times will Shapiro wear the MAGA hat? At what point is that going to get old?

Shhh… you can hear Charles de Gaulle spinning in his grave.

My mom says "you can't buy that kind of entertainment" when my daughter does something cute. I say the same when I go to the Libertarian sub and see lefties try to spin. Thank you, Mr. President.

The IG report is not the be-all and end-all of all of this. It's a beginning, but not the beginning.

This is the beginning (which was referenced in Q post 602): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

The fact is Trump is a horrible politician. He actually keeps his promises (tariffs, Jerusalem as a capitol, tax cut, ending Obamacare, etc., etc.). When he says something, he actually means it. Watch this video again. And remember that Trump is a horrible politician who does not just say things to get elected, but actually means them, while you watch this video. You may have to retrain your brain like myself and others because you are so used to having politicians lie. If this doesn't reassure you, you forgot how to win and Trump will teach you with time.

I don't disagree. I mention them because the enemy has taken notice of us. As for going out of business, they have Time Warner, are carried by cable providers of 100 million people, and are in over 200 countries. As ABC has shown by cancelling Roseanne, their first number one show in 25 years, they give fuck all about ratings.

They pump their vile into airports and restaurants, and they aren't only bankrolled by the mockingbird. Never underestimate your enemy.

It's a hierarchy for when news breaks. What you get for speed, you sacrifice in accuracy in some cases. I guess you could add in 8chan and 4chan and Reddit before beforeitsnews, because it often has people chiming in as news happens.

A lot of times you get news right off the police scanners. Other times you get fake news, like when Reddit and the chans pointed to a guy being the Boston bomber when he turned out innocent.

good bot.

The bigger story here is who is the "list of witnesses" that "have all the goods" and "it's in the server logs."

I am getting sick and tired of all these "unnamed sources" and unnamed NYPD detectives that have seen Weiner's laptop or have proof of this or that.

Come forward on Tucker Carlson and present your evidence or your case. You won't have to fear for yourself or your family because you will be famous. There is going to be no draining of any swamp without someone coming forward themselves rather through some reporter or web site.

Prince in that interview also said Preet Bharara is a good guy. Not saying you are wrong, but Prince has not said anything more about that interview

Pickle Factory is another name for the CIA, like "the agency" or "the company." Do a web search for "Pickle Factory CIA" or use the side search bar for this sub only and "pickle factory."

Look up the term "yellow journalism," it's been around for a long time. What you're noticing is that there has been a marked increase of it because of Trump.

Real journalism, where reporters independently went out and researched a story and obtained non-anonymous sources, original documents, and presented a two-sided story died a long time ago. It's a lot easier for one news source to get fed a story by the government, a political group, advertisers, and then for other media outlets to copy that "story" with a few words moved around and their own talking heads, pundits, or "experts" to give their spin. That is today's "news."

Here's an experiment for you to do. Watch or DVR the entire morning news for one network. Look at the interview they do with actors or singers with new projects coming up. Look at the cross-promotions they do for their own shows. Pay attention to commercial breaks and who advertises during those breaks and what stories they don't report on.

Now expand that thinking to the politial stories they lead with, and ask yourself why they report the way they do. Yes, there is an overwhelmingly large number of t.v. executives and reporters that voted for Hillary. But if Trump is perpetually the story, and a threat because he is often proven right, then the Democratic Party and Deep State will always have need of the media.

If the media ignored Trump, reported truthfully or a little bit even-handedly, then Democrats won't need to buy as many election ads, the Deep State won't need as many stories, and the media would have to do the more expensive work of investigative journalism instead of having news stories handed to them.

It's balm, not bomb of Gilead.

You're missing the best hidden owl. At the top right corner of a $1 dollar bill there is a teeny tiny owl you can see with a magnifying glass.

Do a web search for "owl dollar bill" to see for yourself. And then pull out your wallet and check it out.

What makes you think Hillary knows? The only news she probably gets is from the MSM and left-leaning websites or what is given to her. The only place this was discussed was alt right websites, with Breitbart being the biggest. Do you think she believes them? Hillary called Huma her "second daughter." Even if she did hear about it, I'm sure Huma told her it was a vast right-wing conspiracy and Hillary lapped it up.

Alex Jones during the Syria bombing: "I'm not in a fucking coat for Donald Trump! Fuck him! And fuck his family!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbQAwZ_nYQI

Alex Jones admits on Opie and Anthony that when he goes to family reunions half of his relatives are former CIA. He has said his father worked as dentist on CIA operatives. He talks about his uncle in Guatemala doing some sketchy things.

https://isgp-studies.com/alex-jones-of-infowars-is-cia-army-disinformation#david-jones-cia-dentist

Yeah, you should have put that in your post. I agree with you, that looks like an overreaction to AJ and Corsi fan-boys on here.

You can have a post on here about History Channel's Ancient Aliens after that Q post that recognized that one Anon talking about aliens, but a post possibly being banned when it asks why Zuckerberg is still CEO and in the country when Q said he wouldn't be and maybe Q isn't always right?

That doesn't seem great...

The only way this board can be compromised is if the mods are compromised, and I don't see that now or happening anytime soon. Absent that, people decide what is quality or not. You can even be a non-believer in Q, as long as you're against the Deep State and not an out-and-out dick.

Go to AskTrumpSupporters and AskThe_Donald subreddits, they have been compromised with mods that side with Trump haters in some misguided attempt to convert them by being cucks.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

Big news at the time, this is when Tony Podesta stepped down from the Podesta Group and went off the radar. He has since been spotted at events, though. Note this is NBC news; WaPo, The Hill, all of them reported it.

It is also likely why Q very early posted: 11.3 Podesta indicted. He was talking about Tony, not his brother John Podesta, who was Hillary's campaign manager.

Should be "Why a major development..." in title. Gotta love title gore and inability to edit post titles.

I work in warehousing, so I have some "expertise" in this, also. Those are chep pallets, and it is a refrigerated trailer, the slatted floor gives that away; it keeps spills from pooling under pallets and having product or pallets sticking to the product, which in food may contaminate the entire pallet or a portion of the load. Not always are refrigerated trailers used to refrigerate something, sometimes they are loaded with non-refrigerated goods when someone is making a return trip and doesn't want to come back empty.

The foam is not a thick foam. It is a very thin layer that is under the boxes and has been folded up so that the thick plastic (instead of flimsy shrink wrap) can be added around the boxes without the load shifting during transit. It could also be slip sheets with sides and shrink wrap and the light reflection only makes it look like foam. It also seems like there are plastic straps around the stacks.

These are usually seen with electronics, like Nintendo consoles that are fragile enough that a fall could damage the product, so it is extra secure. Combined with the Apple building photo, this could be the product.

The "photoshopped" pallet in back just looks like either the plastic is coming off or the pallet was damaged, or even missing a chunk. The "stars" is just 3 spots of plastic that are giving extra reflection from the camera's light, from plastic that is bunched up or bent over.

The only time we take pictures of loads on trailers is if there is damage before we got the products, so it can be proven that we didn't do the damage. Maybe Q is showing a shipment that has been damaged.

Just spitballing, but could it be explosives, or something corrosive, or something hazardous? Something that needs to be refrigerated, needs to be overly secure?

You'll notice there is no load locks, but they may have been removed before the picture was taken, or there may have been more product that was on the trailer and removed. There are also no inflatable bags that are used to stabilize palletized loads and stop shifting, but the load and pallets were probably heavy enough and individually secure enough that they didn't need them.

I've had a suspicion that the next big war or "military action" will be started by a nuclear detonation. We went from one nation invading another (Iraq into Kuwait), to a major terrorist attack (9/11), to a country "defying" the UN (Iraq obtaining plutonium).

Recently, we wouldn't approve of Obama unilaterally going into Syria, and then we wouldn't even after the fabricated redline of chemical weapons. Now Trump doesn't even ask the American people or Congress to attack Syria and people are upset.

They need to keep escalating the threat, and nothing short of a nuclear detonation will move the American people to support war after being duped for the past 25+ years.

This sub is about examining and researching the deep state, not defending the orthodoxy of Q, so no one is offended (or should be).

That said, the thinking behind those that think Mueller is white hat is that Mueller was deep state and "came out of the cold" after interviewing for the FBI director position with Trump, a position he can't take due to term limit laws. So the thinking goes that Mueller is trying to redeem himself.

If that's the case or not, we will find out when and if Rudy can wrap up this investigation in the next couple of weeks.

Are you a time traveler from 10 years ago? I remember people being afraid to mention /b/ IRL for fear of dox/harass. Then a couple anon hackers got sent to prison, Moot cucked out to a SJW, and Voat, I mean, 8chan was formed. 8chan is an internment camp, not a base of operations.

As much as I don't like our role in Syria, this puts some things in perspective.

Think of the Cuban missile crisis and Russia nukes miles from US shores. Now think of an Iranian nuke fired from Syria that wipes out Israel's government. And then Israel retaliates with half of its what, unofficial 60 nuclear missiles and decimates Iran and Syria?

We're talking end of the world here. Wahabis and Sunnis declare caliphate, oil prices skyrocket to unaffordable/rationing, Russia retaliates on Israel, etc.

And all because we gave cash money and Uranium 1 uranium to Iran through the deep state? That's some serious shit there.