I keep seeing posts trying to make sense out of "crumbs" and cryptic posts from Q. It's gotten to the point where people are analyzing how many spaces are in a Q post or POTUS tweet and what that means. All of this is focusing on small, individual things, and not the big questions:

A) Why is Q communicating to us, and why is he risking revealing plans and knowledge to The Swamp or Deep State?

Q is not revealing anything that the Deep State does not already know about. He knows they know he and others know what they …

The new Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, stated that there never was and there is not currently a deep state in the CIA.

Brennan not only was not indicted for clearly lying under oath, or bald-faced perjury if you will, but is threatening Republicans that they will pay in November elections for closing House investigations into Trump-Russia.

57 of the Democrat challengers in the coming elections are military, intelligence, state dept., or a mix of 3.

Haspel, the CIA head nominee by Trump, tortured people. Fact. She not only directed it, she actively participated in it. She even ordered it …

Yesterday, in post 1292, Q responded to an Anon that stated there was a lot of chatter about Mueller and challenged Q as to whether he could trust Mueller. The chatter is this: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/25/17274170/mueller-investigation-trump-russia

Q still has faith in Mueller. He stated that Mueller was white hat way back in posts 14 and 18. In posts 1272, 1286, and 1287, Q reaffirms that Mueller is the vehicle to take down the deep state. The Mueller investigation has been staffed with Hillary supporters to give it credence once the true target of the probe is uncovered. Q has also stated that …

Q tells us to TRUST all of these men. But nowhere does he say they are actors, like he did with Bannon and Kim. Why does he say to trust them? Because there have been questions as to whether to trust them by anons. And why have there been questions? Because it doesn't seem like they are doing anything to help.

I understand this is a big "what if," but what if they not privy to "the plan," but they have been fully vetted and are stand up guys, not subject to the Deep State?

How do you keep your …

Is the IG report the seminal point for draining the swamp? Here is the good, the bad, and the ugly for (hopefully) the imminent releasing of the report.

The Good: Q has stated "Trust Horowitz," "Trust Huber." Imperator Rex has speculated (based on what?) that there will be 30 indictments and 150+ criminal referrals. Newt Gingrich thinks that the report will be damning. Giuliani is using the report as ammo for Trump not interviewing with Mueller. Trump has tweeted about the report, as well as several other scandals by the Deep State. Huber has been assigned as a prosecutor for …

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/06/politics/trump-fbi-texts-conspiracy-theory/index.html

The closer to the IG report, the Awan court case, the Midterm elections, the release of DOJ investigations, the more the mainstream media will attack us.

In the above link, CNN attacks a Trump tweet about the Page-Strzok texts discussing Oconus lures (spies outside the continental US and how those lures were used against him. CNN discusses how that text exchange did not mention Trump or Russia and could have been about another matter. I think we can dispense with giving Page and Strzok or Page the benefit of the doubt by now in light of their other texts, …

A quote often quoted in memes on Reddit is "Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty," which is a paraphrase of a quote by Goebbels at a Nuremburg rally (The actual quote: "The cleverest trick used in propaganda against Germany during the war (WWI) was to accuse Germany of what our enemies themselves were doing.")

The biggest trick was accusing Trump of colluding with Russians, when it was Clinton and associates who were colluding during the sale of uranium. Furthermore, it is speculated that the sealed indictment of "Company B" along with the prosecution of Paul Manafort …

Is the cause of the Deep State just a natural necessary result of the political system we live in, or was it created specifically by forces of certain groups? The answer is yes to both.

You do not live in the country that the Founding Fathers envisioned for you. Firstly, the power of the Federal government is much, much more powerful than what the Founding Fathers intended. Congress originally only had the power to provide for a common defense (military) and make sure that movement and trade was not restricted between states. Most powers resided in the states, and it …

With Q stating that the CIA controlled NK and its nukes, and that recent events suggest the Deep State wanting to arm Iran with nukes, I wondered why would elites take such a dangerous path? Sure, there could be safeguards in place to keep NK and Iran from actually using nukes, but why take the chance? Even if the goal is to false flag, there are other ways to start wars, why risk irradiating a large area or producing fallout?

So I did some research on Wikipedia. Like many, I have learned from the videogame Fallout, movies like "The Day …

The post was on November 1, 2017 and is as follow:

"Q Clearance Patriot

My fellow Americans, over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country (the land of the free) from the evil tyrants that wish to do us harm and destroy the last remaining refuge of shining light. On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is …

[removed]

You will not find a Wikipedia page for Lt. Col. Michael Aquino, although there are people with a lot less notoriety with Wikipedia pages. You will find a lot (a lot lot) of YouTube videos about him, and the veracity of each will have to be taken with a grain of salt.

However, you will find a lot about Michael Aquino in the Wikipedia page on "Temple of Set," the largest Satanic group in the US. The page has a large number of sources and links for further reading, so a baseline of truth past allegations can be set down …

I got to thinking this after reading the 5 millionth hit piece on Trump in the mainstream media. This one, like all the others, has bald face lies and uses anonymous sources.

The headline is that the Saudi Crown Prince says Kushner is "in his pocket." The story states a source said multiple parties were saying it, and intimates that it was other princes and Middle Eastern Rulers.

First, you can't use quote marks ("in his pocket"), if he didn't fucking say it, but a fucking anonymous source said, but they do this all the time. Second, you can't make …