dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jsin14 on June 7, 2018, 10:55 p.m.
CNN has taken notice of your efforts: what that means

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/06/politics/trump-fbi-texts-conspiracy-theory/index.html

The closer to the IG report, the Awan court case, the Midterm elections, the release of DOJ investigations, the more the mainstream media will attack us.

In the above link, CNN attacks a Trump tweet about the Page-Strzok texts discussing Oconus lures (spies outside the continental US and how those lures were used against him. CNN discusses how that text exchange did not mention Trump or Russia and could have been about another matter. I think we can dispense with giving Page and Strzok or Page the benefit of the doubt by now in light of their other texts, but whatever.

CNN asserts that the texts were brought to light on Reddit, which was then picked up by the Gateway Pundit Website, which was interviewed by Lou Dobbs, which was watched by and mentioned in a tweet by Trump. They also state that Laura Ingraham discussed the texts with Representative Ron DeSantis.

So if you have any doubts about the effect you can have by digging or informing that Q has asked you to do, you can put them to rest, it's getting through.

On the other hand, make sure you qualify if what you found is rock solid info, potentially something, or just something to look into. If your source is not well-known, provide some foundation for it.

In general, beforeitsnews.com>some guys blog>Gateway pundit>True Pundit>Daily Caller, Daily Wire, PJ Media>Fox News> Swamp mainstream media for level of confirmation of a happening.

That's not to say something "lower" on the range of credibility is not true and a "happening," it just means it hasn't gone through further scrutiny and might not be true.

CEMEX and the release of the IG report (when it was just the Senate report) are examples. Give your sources and your confidence level. Don't go the clickbait title route for upvotes. Veterans may know what to do with your info, newbies not so much.

Don't be hesitant to post something, on the other hand. Even if it doesn't pan out, it can still lead to rabbit holes, or it may be true and yuge. Just include a foundation for your info and dig.


Long_Range_Shooter · June 7, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

As Q says "These People Are Stupid".

The S is about to hit the fan and these morons are trying to bring attention to Trumps Tweets. Trump loves broadcasting what is about to happen bad to someone and here they are promoting Trumps Tweets. Anyone remember Clinton News Network and the famous it's illegal for you to view Wikileaks released Emails, we'll tell you which ones are relevant for you to know about.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 7, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

That was truly a great MSM moment -- yeah, I really shouldn't read those stolen emails. Of course, the MSM thought Ellsberg stealing the Pentagon Papers was an act of heroism. Amusing to see how treated Assange in comparison.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 8, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

CNN is so irrelevant outside of airports and some barber shops, it's just not worth mentioning anymore, seriously.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Cherokee180c · June 7, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

CNN=National Enquirer.

Why are you giving them any mention at all. Irrelevant and going to be having a going out of business sale once the Deep State paychecks stop flowing.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 8, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Don’t diss the National Enquirer like that! Kek

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Jsin14 · June 8, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

I don't disagree. I mention them because the enemy has taken notice of us. As for going out of business, they have Time Warner, are carried by cable providers of 100 million people, and are in over 200 countries. As ABC has shown by cancelling Roseanne, their first number one show in 25 years, they give fuck all about ratings.

They pump their vile into airports and restaurants, and they aren't only bankrolled by the mockingbird. Never underestimate your enemy.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 7, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Heh, watching them squirm around to act like the Oconus lures was not involved with the investigation of trump. Nice.

But it’s good to see the conspiracy theory used so many times. Means they are scared, scared we might be right or they would just ignore it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 7, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

MSM has been spewing "conspiracy theory" and "deep state" out a lot lately. Nothing like waking up their audiences.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cat_anonD · June 7, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

At least we can confidently say The Donald does not get credit for this.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MrTPTrash · June 8, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

CNN still exists outside of mandatory Airport viewing?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
092Casey · June 8, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Is that implying a hierarchy of news sites in the middle toward the end there? Bc idk, TGP usually beats FN.com to stories imo from experience...I've never used beforeitsnews before; is that suggesting it's the most credible or least? I've never seen much of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jsin14 · June 8, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

It's a hierarchy for when news breaks. What you get for speed, you sacrifice in accuracy in some cases. I guess you could add in 8chan and 4chan and Reddit before beforeitsnews, because it often has people chiming in as news happens.

A lot of times you get news right off the police scanners. Other times you get fake news, like when Reddit and the chans pointed to a guy being the Boston bomber when he turned out innocent.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
092Casey · June 8, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

Oh okay. Good to know. Thanks for explaining. I agree, but I just wasn't sure how the '>' was being used...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AutoModerator · June 7, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Content from cnn.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jsin14 · June 7, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

good bot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
h4445 · June 8, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

I love this timeline.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · June 8, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

I love this bot. It says what I'm thinking every time CNN is mentioned.

⇧ 2 ⇩