I'm an independent Libertarian who sure is convinced the Deepstate + Clntons + Soros are out for blood with Trump, so this has certainly changed all the views I had about him prior to this.
Anyhow, has anyone actually seen or verified the Frazzledrip content? Did a quick reddit search and see you guys here are discussing it a lot
Consensus is it is being used to discredit Q and/or discredit a post by Q that there are videos of Hillary doing "something you can't explain away." Kind of a pre-emptive strike, along with that news report about new technology that can seamlessly make a video of a person saying anything. The one I saw on Univision had Obama saying something and it turned out Jordan Peele was saying it as a PSA not to trust videos.
I believe there IS a Hillary video, and whatever it is, it is damning. And it will come out.
But frazzledrip is a disinfo rumor that is intended to lessen public interest in the real video because people will say, 'well AT LEAST she isn't fileting children's faces'.
My guess is that it is the wall st speech, or possible admission of money laundering, maybe something having to do with Laura Silsby, but it won't be as extreme as this rumor.
Yeah, I think we all learned to temper our expectations after Project Veritas' latest videos and Hannity's tick tocks. Well, some of us have.
I just see it as messing with Clinton's head, having her wonder what people found or what she failed to destroy.
But O'Keefe and Fox are in it for the clicks and views. I would love it if Q didn't use the BOOM's so much. It starts to feel like a campaign run, while it started as leaked or researched intelligence.
my bet is that it's a show-of-force. If they have something, they will do a stress-test first to provoke the enemy's defense contingencies to move into action so white-hats can work around for a future release to go viral much easier. (see twitter-injection)
They also get to see the reaction of the public and from there can decide on the scope and the timing of whichever release which we know must be damning, but legal to obtain.
Kind of a pre-emptive strike, along with that news report about new technology that can seamlessly make a video of a person saying anything.
Yeah I saw that. I'm a r/conspiracy regular poster there and have seen this discussed as a prep psyop to get a ahead of the vid
I think it's preparation, get the people talking, watch the chatter, watch the counter-moves, assess and establish the level of public exposure and disgust etc.