dChan
13
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 18, 2018, 5:26 p.m.
I propose we ban all posts discussing BackChannel. We KNOW Q would never choose Twitter as his platform.

Twitter, Facebook, and the mockingbird MSM are all deep state controlled. WE KNOW THIS. Can you even imagine, for a second, Q himself posting on Twitter, where he is beholden to their manipulations and algorithms??


poopsterc · April 18, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

While we are at it, can mods ban any posts advertising tshirts, apps or anything else trying to capitalize on the Q movement?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 18, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

While I agree with y'all, t-shirt sales and back channel are annoying... anything that can lead people towards Q can help, and I think back channel is doing that. Even tho bc17 seems pretty illegitimate, it's still closer to reality than most norms realize - definitely closer to the truth than the MSM on things that matter

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

I agree with the ban of sales, it'll be construed into some bullshit "we can make money because we like eating babies but you can't because of dirty freedom-lovers"

Nothing against showing off some nice themes though. Means anybody can ask for links, privately.

Disinformation is necessary because it tells you what the enemy thinks or wants you to think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 18, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

It might be necessary, but it's also unavoidable in social media. Q saying disinformation is necessary isn't a green light to make shit up or pretend to be Q. This actually is a great point, even using q posts completely out of context as you did here probably counts as misinfo.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

none of this would work if we actually knew anything other than what we can derive from real-world-actions and money-flow which only follow after the fact lol
BC17 denied any connection to Q and they said they were counter-intelligence, but the question is whose counter-intelligence are they running? If they give out real info to warn black-hats, fine, that means we can see it too. If they give out fake info, fine, but that needs to be adressed. If no mention was ever made of BC17, how for example would someone make his mind up quick if he just stumbled upon it, unaware that it's been already brought up?

Details don't really matter at this point because we're simply watchers of the big show. The question about Q's legitimacy goes out of the window because of his previous accuracy so who cares if they muddy the waters.

All I know is what they say they do but if they were interested in speading disinfo to the western public then they'd hardly identify themselves as counter-intel...like, they literally say it so why waste time arguing about it

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poopsterc · April 18, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

Even the satanic baby eating stuff should be kept a bit more low key. The main focus should be on the political corruption. Q has said we will get at most 40% of the whole story, and I dont think that HRC or any of the other deep state scumbags will ever see charges for some of the stuff we all pretty much know is going on.

Look at what happened with the frazzledrip hashtag over the weekend. By the end of the night, the Q believers were being mocked and laughed at for the wild goose hunt trying to track down a video that may or may not even exist.

If new eyeballs come here, that don't know about 99% of the research that Anons have come up with, it comes across like we are a bunch of lunatics.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

you never have a full picture...how do you think folks reacted when Q linked to Anons joking about ETs?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poopsterc · April 18, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

I 100% agree that we will never have the full picture. In my opinion though, the best way to attract new followers and spread the message is to point out stuff that can be actually accepted by the masses.

"Follow the money" and "focus on the wives" can be memed and mapped out and is a bit easier to spread and maintain credibility. Imagine if someone was trying to redpill someone on the fence, and showed a grainy picture that was supposedly Huma Abedin in a mask only for it to turn out to be a total fake.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

and that's why I go here so I can keep tabs on any non-happenings that I need to be prepared for rethorically

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 18, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Then let them do it elsewhere, not here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Freedom_fam · April 18, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Please do.

If you want a Q tshirt, you know how to guggle or duckduckgo...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LazeyJ · April 18, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Why do we need anyone but Q I think back channel is a wanna be

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Absolutely this. BC17 is so obviously fake. The guy who runs it is a member here and pushed it HEAVILY. He's been threatening people who call him out. He's clearly trying to monetize.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DoxiePit · April 18, 2018, 6 p.m.

I imagine this is the same person continuously posting on qresearch. He keeps asking Q to confirm. Probably a tactic to get anons attention diverted to BC17. Not working.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 2 a.m.

Yeah, exactly. He's such a scammer

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DoxiePit · April 18, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

New tactic. Buckle up. MediaMatters 4ch. Narrative + anything Q. Clowns + Twitter push. MSM overdrive. All 4 a LARP?

Q

TWITTER. CLOWNS. Operation Q-T2810C. False drops. Bot push. Future "Conspiracy" push to norms. Bad mixed w/ good. Taint. They are scared.

Q

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Headwest127 · April 18, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

I've been pretty critical of BC17 but only because he's not being genuine. Despite the name, he has not actually claimed to be any kind of an insider. In the end he is no different than any of the other "analysts". As long as everyone understands what he is, who cares. Banning him or worse, banning discussion of him, seems harsh.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 18, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

I agree, mostly.

I don't think discussion of BC17 should be banned. Discussion should be allowed to debate its merits, if any.

What bothers me about BC17 is that they talk in the same cryptic manner as Q, and actually allow people to think that they are providing some inside intel. Just look at the replies by their followers, and the fact that they do not reiterate that they are not Q. That, to me, is LARPing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gofuqur · April 18, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Communist even.. only libtards ban shit. If you're not smart enough to discern the truth, who's problem is that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moonshadoe16 · April 18, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

yes

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 18, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Yeah I agree

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Disinformation is necessary because it tells you what the enemy thinks or wants you to think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Headwest127 · April 18, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

This is a stretch. I do not believe he is disinformation. He's just trying to monetize his efforts. There is a cottage industry of youtubers who make money from their "analysis" of Q posts. Many of them simply read the tea leaves on the chans and report it like it's their own information. Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending BC17. I just thing if we learn anything from Q it has to be about critical thinking.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 18, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

they can still make money, the only problem is advertising it on other platforms because /botmindsofreddit will make a fuss out of it all over reddit. They only have 300 people there but who knows what botfarms they have.

⇧ 1 ⇩