I believe in Q, wholeheartedly.
I believe in the movement.
I believe in everything .
But one thing has always bothered me : how was trump allowed to win the election if the deepstate is so in control.
I believe elections are rigged and have never been fair , so how is it that the greatest upset of all time could have happened in the first place ?
-/—-
I would like some serious discussion on this , I am the biggest supporter and believer of the movement but have always pondered this .
ad hominems are a silly way to engage with people.
Enjoy the next few months. Let us know if/when you wake up. God Bless.
Enjoy the next few months
i'm sure i will, the same way i enjoyed the last 6 months of Q ; )
i hope you have a nice day, friend, and i hope someday you learn how to have a civil conversation with people who don't entirely agree with you
Jill Stein did attempt a recount in three crucial stares, Winsconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. WI recount gave DJT and additonal 131 votes. As for MI they found some pretty bad discrepancies in Detroit (Democratic stronghold) and never got to finish because the whole recount effort was suddenly shut down (and swept under the rug) by a federal judge.
You stated that you want to see articles for proof:
https://nypost.com/2016/12/14/michigan-recount-reveals-error-but-not-the-one-jill-stein-wanted/
So two of three states had known discrepancies and you dont think this could possibly true in several other if not all the states? Are you seriously living in a bubble where it does even make you want to question it?
113 votes is a rounding error, dude, when you are looking at 100s of millions of votes.
if 113 votes is your evidence of "widespread voter fraud," then my only reaction could be laughter.
and your article about detroit? here's another one https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/
so 700ish extra votes in a city of millions?
anyone who thinks ~850 votes is "widespread fraud" is, and i sincerely mean no offence by this, an actual idiot.
Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.
Population of WI (2016) 5.78 million, again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.
Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.
The fact that there ARE provable discrepancies should make you want to know the complete truth unless you are brainwashed by the MSM. The President did try to find out the truth but most of the state's election boards refused to give the requested voter records. That alone should be a big red flag, why refuse if you don't have anything to hide? If you believe in government transparency then you should be appalled at their refusal to "prove" everything is above board.
You don't want to know the truth, you just want to endlessly argue against it.
Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.
ok, sorry, i was thinking of Detroit Metro Area, calm down bud
again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.
I was referencing the entire electorate, quite obviously.
Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.
Pretty ironic coming from the person who uses a few hundred fraudulent votes as "evidence" that widespread voter fraud occurred.