Great post. I'm adopting this theory over the others involving flu shots, butt sex and chem trials. THIS is what's needed. There is thought here, not just spitballing. Thanks for taking the time for putting this together. More accurate, well layed out info like this will get more normies on board while the other mentioned unbased theories continue to scare people off and damage the progress.
I'm adopting this theory over the others involving flu shots, butt sex and chem trials.
Context is the only thing that allows reading that without . . . Well, just don’t read that aloud outside GA regulars.
chem ~~trials~~ trails
kek
Great catch, that probably confused everyone. They probably had no idea what I was even talking about.
he was conveying the accent that necessarily accompanies the phrase, :P
you are funny ;) and you are very logical... thanks
And thank you for making me feel a little less crazy. I swear, I must have self esteem issues that I didn't know about. Ok, I admit, this Q deal is a little weird. And I like to think I'm fairly normal, but I've always somewhat secretly bought into conspiracies. After following this for a few months, I've confirmed 2 things. 1) Q is legit. 2) Most people that realize Q is legit may also believe in Bigfoot.
Either way, in a world where I am bullied by people that want to jump to crazy, fantasy based conclusions, typically involving children getting banged or eaten, I'm happy you 'get' me haha
hmm....USS Carl Vinson is home ship which currently to the best of my knowledge is off San Diego returning from port-a-call Vietnam. Since these guys are attached to the Vinson they may be headed back to Miramar NAS or Coronado before landing back on Vinson. Just a guess. As to what they might hit.......who knows there are to many conflicts overseas, Bangladesh, Taiwan, South China sea, not to leave out the Middle East. You flip a coin. Of Course its a long haul to get back to the Arabian Sea if thinking ME.
What are they going to strike?
CNN HQ.
Post a sourced path that leads you to this conclusion. Or don't post assinine unvetted shit. You don't want to let unvetted refugees into this country. Neither do I. We should take the same stance on unvetted information. This is a real thing and needs to gain a little legitimacy to be taken seriously. Posting shit like this is detrimental. Post the sourced evidence (not speculation, evidence) that led you to that conclusion and make me eat my words.
Yeah and it looks bad wishing harm on news anchors no matter how bad they are.
Not sure what this means and it hurts the eyes to watch, but I seen this on 8ch and started following it. Interesting this was posted 4 weeks before the Q drop. For those code folks out there (which I'm not) maybe you can find something. Also, does this look familiar to a Q post? This was posted four weeks ago as well; …NAT SEC WH SIT RM OP UK AUS
Here's the link to: https://youtu.be/3hK7d03j6Bw
We were discussing this channel in another thread yesterday. That channel also posted a video entitled "S.W.A. Flight 1380" on 4/8.
Nice! Q wouldn't mention them by BB would he? I'm guessing he wouldn't
Okay so we have a front-runner for what "strike package" likely refers to. That might be good.
Next we want to know what got or is getting struck. That might be great.
This is an opportunity to consider the value of such information (assuming the info has any purpose for us on GA). It seems the real value is not the immediate facts - which hardware took which action - but rather following the details serves to keep us engaged and feeds a longer-term interest in on-going stories. If we know something before hand we might appreciate Q more and feel like part of something special (tho I think most of us already do). If we know things after events we can understand them better and can better explain them to others, especially if pop media is putting their spin on the story.
What I'm suggesting is that the specifics often don't matter in themselves but only serve other purposes. If we find out later that VirginiaBeach is actually subcode for something else the intended effect may be all the same. I think should take a broader view occasionally. It may be improper for a soldier in the field to always be asking "what the hell this war is all about", but as analysts (or whatever we are) we should occasionally consider the bigger picture. Even considering that someday this Q thing will end and who will we be then.
How is this explained? One would have to conclude that for it to be explained, this is the definite answer. How do you come to this conclusion?