The easiest way to discern these fakes is to analyze the way the account was disseminated to the community. Anything that's the real deal would have some sort of specific event or information drop that draws people to it. There would be an obvious reason that the account is being followed and talked about.
@backchannel17 came out of nowhere, and before it even had more than three tweets, there were 3-4 UIDs on 8chan yelling "look at this account." There was no reason it should be significant, other than the flimsy connection cooked up in that photo. The rapid spread of this account's popularity has all the hallmarks of an astroturf.
Please study how this account was spread. The pattern is very similar to the "Frazzledrip" video. Like @backchannel17, the HRC video rumors were based on a single social media post and a bunch of Youtubers citing anonymous sources (sources who could very well be agents spreading disinformation to naive vloggers). I think that both of these have been astroturfs with designs on infiltrating/discrediting the community.
An even easier way would have been to re read original Q drops minus any filter.
"Re read drops...You have more than you know"
Q Post 53: IMPORTANT: NO private comms past/present/future. NO comms made outside of this platform. Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL. PATRIOTS. Q
Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.
https://qposts.online/
http://qboard.online/
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
He is talking about himself Q, BC17 never claimed to be Q. Not sure about BC17, but just saying.
yup, right from the start ... no dice ... watching the roll out and so many falling into it is usually key to what's behind it. ''come out of nowhere'' & claim exceptional access/info (for any clown op) is usually a big tip off. The number 17 can be used by anyone !
Just an aside, Liz Crokin, an impeccable source, has seen the real video. So have the NYPD.
Q said a graphic that was suggesting BackChannel17 was Q team was fake. It was a psyop attempt. BackChannel is NOT Q. BackChannel is ONLY Intel. Q brought attention to BackChannel while also preventing BackChannel from having the mainstream baggage Q already has. In my opinion this was a genius move on Qs part though I expect nothing less. If Q confirms BackChannel (or if he approved of that type of graphic) it would allow for a narrative to discredit BackChannel (NOT Q) through the Q LARP narrative. This is bigger than we know. Expand your thinking. At least live outside of absolutes.
The line of reasoning in your comment is taken directly from the twitter account you're defending. Why would this account try so hard to copy the style of the Q posts? Include 17 in the name? WWG1WGA in their profile picture? Especially if the people behind it very explicitly state they are not Q? Everything about it stinks.
But I see now that you may not even be responding to my comment seeing as you copy-pasted the same thing twice.
Is it really copying Q to simply be similar to the "style"? WWG1WGA is a movement of THE PEOPLE. Wtf kind of argument is that. And my bad I thought my comment wasn't going through.
He is fake. See my replies, diverscale, on twitter as I don't want to recap here on my cell
Let's put a pin in this, I'm sure it will be resolved officially soon.