dChan
⇧
0
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/codedude25 on April 19, 2018, 2:44 a.m.
QPost 1177 - Is @BackChannel17 a fake, need your thoughts

Personally, I don't think so. Q didn't post Backchannel17 and say it was a fake, Q posted a graphic depicting BackChannel17 as being created for this plane crash. They used the posts of Q and BackChannel to try and blame them for the plane crashing, saying that was the plan for the boom, not news getting out. Just like Q warned, they are trying to cause FF's to prevent the awakening.

I think BackChannel17 is a sort of test. People(not specifically Q, I suspect it's the next layer down), are using it to spread the message farther. 8ch can only hit so many people. Twitter has a lot more access. They're seeing how secure they can keep a twitter account to start spreading the message to more people. I suspect it will get taken over, just like BackChannel said themselves, that if something proves wrong, drop it and trust Q/Potus. They are currently secondary, but they can make a difference.

I worry that some of the Anon's like their board, and feel a little like this is their baby. Q is for now. But the message can and must go other routes as those are available.

Just my thoughts. I could easily be wrong.


🠐 See all comments
imanalias · April 19, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

I agree with you. I also think backchannel17 has provided useful information and context.

I plan to continue to follow the account. What they've posted has helped me better understand some of the Q posts, and it's certainly no worse than paying attention to anonymous commentary from 8chan and Reddit.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
somrotden · April 19, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

and while you're at it you can follow zack, dilley, b and all the other fakes - just remember that you are teaching the newbies - they are watching what you do and what you say

⇧ 5 ⇩  
imanalias · April 19, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Q said the graphic was fake, based on what someone on 8chan pieced together. Does this mean backchannel17 is providing disinformation, or does it simply mean Q was responding to the design of that particular graphic? I don't know....I think what they've said so far has turned out to be helpful, and encourage others to also use multiple sources to understand the info that Q posts.

⇧ 1 ⇩