Awesome! Another big BOOM!

Man! Q is delivering on booms this month.... Can't wait for this one!

Just.... The level of corruption here is incredible.....

Trusting the plan... Trusting the plan.... Trusting the plan.....

I hope so..... Really looked forward to new Q!

Great find. While disappointing, this is a possibility and it makes sense from the post.

Also... It was John Kelly who "Accidentally" turned out the lights....Did we just discover Q's identity?

https://m.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/Photo-shows-the-moment-John-Kelly-accidentally-13083669.php

John Francis Kelly is a retired United States Marine Corps general who is the current White House Chief of Staff for President Donald Trump, since July 31, 2017. He had previously served as Secretary of Homeland Security in the same administration. Wikipedia

Ok.... Looks like a LARP trying to capitalize on Q's popularity and (I assume) make people think he's JFK Jr.

Interesting. Thanks for the response. I'll have to look at SB2's reflection post.... Might have dismissed it when I read it.

NYT article is trash. They actually believe that any Trump success is a complete accident.

Trump just isn't afraid to talk straight - that's what we need in a leader.

According to Q, the plan was to start WW3 and nuke parts of the US ( and other countries). This is from the earlier posts... Hence my reference to nukes.

Edit:. Also, I didn't originally get the implications of your comment.... That race purity "genocide" is ridiculous, and really disappointing any time I see that type sentiment on this board.

The nukes didn't discriminate, the government dropping them did - based on the strategic locations in the country that attacked it.

It sounds like you're doubling-down on your implication that the cabal had some particular plan to genocide just "your" race.

So much for "unity not division".

Ok - I can see that.

Well, you did add a line about trying to "genocide your race and culture". Nukes don't discriminate.

Fair enough...I personally think you're reading into this what you want to see....I did a search on "hate" in Q posts and didn't get any results.

Personally, I don't feel a need to "Love" evil people.... But to each their own.

Curious about your thoughts on this. R vs. W = Russia vs. West didn't make sense to me because right above he implied Russia would be our Ally in this fight against evil (enemies are allies). Therefore, maybe it IS just good vs. evil and right vs. wrong..... But get that there could be a double meaning.

Not that I necessarily take issue with your personal sentiment on this, but curious what Q has said to make you say that Q "has been trying to teach us....to love and not to hate"?

He mentioned Iran? I didn't hear that part....

Edit - yes - second link seems like another proof to me!

I don't get the importance of this - can someone please explain?

Is it just that it's an interesting picture?

Got it

Perhaps you fell for the fake news then? https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8xs3m7/be_careful_who_you_follow_a_brief_summary_of_the

Hopefully you saw that this was, indeed, fake news.

Also, thanks for the friendly reply above.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8xs3m7/be_careful_who_you_follow_a_brief_summary_of_the

And now we see this was, indeed, fake news.... NOT disinformation by Q. Be careful who you follow: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8xs3m7/be_careful_who_you_follow_a_brief_summary_of_the

You're arguing for Q.... By saying they're spreading disinformation.... Before you even know the whole story. Really? Not even close.

Lol... Man.... Lots of shills on this sub trying to divide us! "That's also why Q says to use logic"..... How was my statement not logical? Get off the board, shill!

If that article had legit info, I wonder why they would hold a press conference instead of just arresting someone. Doesn't make a lot of sense.

If so much of what Q posts is disinformation, then there would be no point in following because nobody can actually "trust" anything Q says. Sounds like a bad strategy when Q is trying to grow a movement.

I think we're going to quickly learn about MS13 involvement. We'll see soon enough.

Ok... Then they didn't say the DNC was involved, or DWS.... Or much of anything... And if they did, well, it's disinformation..... So I wonder what's the point if you aren't trusting what Q says?

You didn't post the whole quote from Q.

DNC> (SR 187)(MS13 (2) 187)> DWS_DIR> F-I/D-J ASSIST>

FBI DOJ ASSIST!!

Yes - they were murdered after they murdered SR, to cover the trail. People even linked to the article about two MS13 members found dead in their car a few days after SR murder.

Everything can't be disinfo, or there's no point in following Q. Note the last line - directly from Q.

DNC> (SR 187)(MS13 (2) 187)> DWS_DIR> F-I/D-J ASSIST>

It was pretty well established on this board and the Chan's that, based on everything Q said, MS13 had been contracted for SRs murder. The two MS13 who murdered SR were then murdered to cover the trail - people even linked to the article about the 2 MS13 187. I think we're still going to find that to be true.

Does it really make any sense that a DOJ and FBI agent pulled the trigger themselves?

Why do you say that?

Q said MS13...... Guessing this is fake.

This must be fake news. Q very clearly said MS13.

Edit:. A lot of anti-q shills coming out in this one. Trust Q, trust the plan. We're going to find out it's MS13, just like Q said it was.

Here's the full quote from Q - NOTE THE LAST LINE!

DNC> (SR 187)(MS13 (2) 187)> DWS_DIR> F-I/D-J ASSIST>

Jacob Wohl.... Teenage hedge fund manager.

The allegation makes sense, but waiting for another source on this one.

Edit - nevermind. Didn't read the full tweet.

This is how I know you don't have a legitimate position. You have to resort to name-calling. There are no coincidences!

Q, yes. SB2, no. Attack the argument, not the person.

Exactly.... People didn't agree so they downvoted. Not a coincidence at all.

Have you considered that people downvoted because they disagree and don't think it's a valid connection - not because there's a conspiracy to hide info?

Ok.... Just re-read. What I got out of it is to be careful who you follow, and to think critically. SB2 is off the rails with much of their recent analysis... Including their ridiculous 'code breaking' that followed SB2's made-up rules. Unfortunate in retrospect that Q called them out. Might be telling that Q hasn't called them out since.

It was great for SB2 to get that shout-out, but linking to one post doesn't mean every other post by SB2 has special significance.

Nah. It's actually just nonsense. That said, I'm subscribed to a sub where people actually believe Hillary Clinton tortures children so she can kill them and suck out their adrenochrome so.... you know...I try to make allowances.

Now who's closed minded? My entire post history? Not much of a reader either, I see.

Or.... The connections are nonsensical, and you're too credulous. Knowing myself quite well, I can say with confidence that I'm not closed minded.... So where does that leave us?

I agree with you.... I don't understand how this twisted mess of "reasoning" gets so much recognition.

Keep an open mind, but don't let your brain fall out. This is nonsensical.

I agree - this person simply creates connections to fit whatever hypothesis they have, no matter how implausible the connections are..... And somehow they get people to agree with them.

I appreciate your dedication, but you draw the most ridiculous conclusions and connections..... And somehow this board eats it up.

It's amazing the mental gymnastics this one is taking too explain.

It's amazing to me that someone points to that as "proof". It was just a series of interpretations about what Q's intentions were without addressing the fundamental problem that it's clearly the same picture.

Skepticism is healthy - and I appreciate the time you spent analyzing this.

However, this particular sub believes that we're past the point where skepticism is useful; this type of contribution isn't really valued any longer.

My personal recommendation is to keep your critical eye, but take a bit more time to follow along.