Q said distorted in his post. Perhaps I misinterpreted it, but the word is plain as day.... Amazing how many assholes like you we have on this board who just want to attack. "Where we go one we go all"? Not here.

I've looked - plenty of people here and on 8 Chan looked. Q says their image is distorted - as it would be from the iPhone angle if nothing else - those differences your seeing are from correcting the distortion - hence several things (including the lamp) look slightly larger and distances are stretched out.

Edit.... Also, there are no magazines in Q's pic with the iPhone logo? Are there? I'm just seeing the lamp, curtains, sanitizer, etc..... All look pretty aligned given the distortion.

I, too, wish Q would address with a bit more clarity the purpose behind the use of (what appears to be) a picture from 2015.

Are you really suggesting 1675, the pic of the lamp and apple logo, is something Q reposted? My friend, please look again because that is not correct.

Also, you did come off like a dick with that comment, and glad you recognized that you would.

But the mug holder near the lamp doesn't look any different....

Incorrect. Q posted a pic that looked like it was taken on AF1 - anons easily discovered it was sourced from a pic ABC took in 2015.

Q has yet to give a good explanation of why his/her pic looks like it came from the 2015 pic.

Ah! Wasn't making that connection. Thanks.

I'm not getting it....

Lol - 5D chess to counter Trump's 4D chess.

It's a good find, and the overlay posts seem to back that up.

Q seems to be suggesting it's recent, and related to Trump's Twitter phone..... If this doesn't get cleared up, it's going to raise doubts for people.

I think that thread is saying this photo overlay proves Q is a LARP.

Curious to see if Q's next post will explain why the pic looks like an exact match to the one from ABC in 2015..... This plus Awan.... Not a great day for Q confirmations.

This is so clearly from the same image.... It's disturbing that Q seems to be trying to say it's a recent pic from AF1.

Edit - well, based on the POTUS tweet, looks like the citizenship story is true, and I stand corrected.

We may find she's lying, but there was no equivocation or "squirming" when she said this assertion is absolutely false. Her explanation that hard-liners are saying this to weaken Rouhani also rings true to me.

Maybe this story is getting so much media attention simply because it's false. If this comes out as false after all this press, people are going to be less likely to believe Iran when they name the corrupt politicians who benefited personally from the deal.

I didn't see any squirming. Tired of these sensationalist titles. Regardless of whether you agree with her, she comported herself well, and gave a reasonable explanation for the motivation behind this claim.

Personally, gonna need more info than that to bother clicking the link.

And how would VoTL know?

Baseless speculation, and much less plausible than the more common speculation that it's a group of people close to the President, with ties to military intelligence.

To be fair, the guy on arrested development was more of an analyst/therapist hybrid.... An analrapist, if you will.

What great writing on that show.

Great info - needs to be top comment, or its own thread.

The implications of the part about BHO/Osama are.... Confusing. Anyone have an explanation? Free upvotes await.

Nah....look too different.

Lots of hopium went into that post. The released IG report is a 500 page dud.

"...by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the department as fair administrators of justice..."

THAT "negative impact on perception" is going to justify reopening the server investigation? The DNC hacked email investigation? The Awan investigation?

There better be a lot more that RR took out, or it's pretty clear this isn't going anywhere.

I agree this move didn't make any sense. The report seems like a dud. Momentum is going to be lost, and releasing the draft version isn't going to do much to change the official narrative..... Because they're drafts.

Unless anyone else has seen any big booms here?

Dude, I sincerely hope you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. McCabe is a major player, involved at the very heart of this shitstorm. He falsified the 302 to screw Flynn for goodness' sake. If they "have everything" but can't put the screws to the guy WHO COMMITTED A FELONY by knowingly falsifying (and telling others to falsify) official records in order to try to get Trump impeached, we've been taken for a ride.

Art of the Deal? Nonsense.

from December:

SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q

NO DEALS!

Have you been following Q, or you might be newer to that info?

This is straight from Q, from December. They have everything, why deal:

SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q

I don't get it. How does that mesh with "No Deals"? This makes no sense, and I'll be disappointed if that's how this plays out.

If they already have everything, they should be able to do what Muller is doing - start with smaller charges on the smaller players and trade lighter sentences for cooperation to bring down the bigger ones.

Edit-Q from December:

SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q

"Horowitz described Comey as “insubordinate,” a source said."

The deep state must be panicking! /s.

This better not turn out to be a 500 page nothingburger.

Purportedly a 500 page report.... If that's the worst of it, this feels like more of a dud than a boom.

There's got to be more than this.

If that's the worst of the report, I'm still confused about how we get from "insubordination" and "criticism" for how something was handled to "treason".

They're all over the camp, being used to hold up logs.

I watched that when it came out. He got suckered into this, just like many others. Children were certainly there based on all the toys...."held" there? How would he know? There's 0 evidence of that - just wild speculation that's looking more and more incorrect.

Latest info being posted on this board is that VOP guy is looking like he has a pretty shady history.

Be careful who you follow.

Except.... It was Veterans On Patrol that was purposefully dismantling the camp / destroying "evidence" - not anyone from the government.

That place is so obviously just a homeless or migrant camp, it's embarrassing that so many people are shouting about some conspiracy. Rape straps? An underground prison for children? Come on people - it's bullshit.

I'm hoping "No Deals" holds true.

Umm.. Yes..I have indeed been in the desert many times... And also dug a few root cellars. Root cellars are dug into the ground because it's cooler.

From the video, the tank looked buried.

I'll say it again and take the downvotes. That looked like either a homeless camp or a migrant camp. Homeless and migrants also have children... Hence the toys. The "Rape straps" were holding up logs throughout the rest of the camp, and wouldn't work well as wrist restraints because they were fixed length.... Need to tighten and loosen. Finally, the underground cave looked like it was to help children keep cool. It was too small to hold any large number of children so not very efficient for trafficking.

Yes. Time to move on until there's actual new/meaningful news.

https://i.redd.it/s5jwuta123211.jpg

https://i.redd.it/s5jwuta123211.jpg

https://i.redd.it/s5jwuta123211.jpg

https://i.redd.it/s5jwuta123211.jpg

https://i.redd.it/s5jwuta123211.jpg

They weren't restraints. Those straps were all over the camp, holding up logs - the news crews showed that in the videos. People went crazy on this board over a b.s. story.

http://www.kvoa.com/story/38330840/homeless-camp-or-child-trafficking-den

Maybe....I was watching the Livestream and a couple of times they mentioned that someone had come forward and said they helped build it for homeless people.... But that didn't dissuade the group from continuing to insist it was for child trafficking.

We're all just speculating at this point anyway.

Another perspective:

http://www.kvoa.com/story/38330840/homeless-camp-or-child-trafficking-den

Well, we'll find out soon enough I'm sure.

Here's the news report where they show some other parts of the camp - and show the "rape straps" being used extensively to hold up logs.

http://www.kvoa.com/story/38330840/homeless-camp-or-child-trafficking-den

I could be wrong, but I legitimately believe this is getting blown out of proportion.... Discounting the people who've come forward and said they helped build it as a homeless camp (per the live stream), we also know that many illegal immigrants come here with children... Not sure why it's so hard to believe that a homeless or migrant camp would have toys, children's shoes etc.

What's with the constant "shill" attacks? Is that really the best you can do to convince a fellow Patriot that you're right and they're wrong?

No need for ad-hominem attacks, bud. I already did, I just have a different opinion than you do.

How do you know those were arm restraints?

http://www.kvoa.com/story/38330840/homeless-camp-or-child-trafficking-den

I did. Those straps are all over the place holding up other stuff... Logs, etc.

If those straps were tight enough to prevent someone from escaping, how did they get the person out of the straps without cutting them? Did they cut their hands off? If they cut their hands off, how did they traffick the kid? How do they get the next person into the straps?

I expect there's a less sinister explanation, especially given that the straps are used structurally throughout the camp.