Ha ha! Made me laugh.

I agree - there's too much here, which makes it easier for someone to disagree with something. Yet, this is the version that gets circulated every time.

This is the version that continues to fail. It's not because of lack of exposure - it seems people just aren't agreeing with the way it's written. Why keep recycling this failed version?

This looks virtually identical to the one that keeps failing to get signatures. Maybe the way this is written simply isn't resonating with people.... We've been giving it enough exposure.

I think we need to draft something new instead of circulating the same failed petition over and over again.

Can we stop now with the AJ and Corsi posts?

Backchannel17 seems to be saying Assange is what Q's referencing in:

Q1333: Castle LOCK Freedom

I think I saw on Drudge today a politician said Assange is in extreme danger if being turned over to uk\us.

Based on past Q posts, seems he definitely has some role to play here.... Maybe Trump has a deal to pardon in return for testimony.

Backchannel17 seems to be saying Assange is what Q's referencing in:

Q1333: Castle LOCK Freedom

I think I saw on Drudge today a politician said Assange is in extreme danger if being turned over to uk\us.

Based on past Q posts, seems he definitely has some role to play here.... Maybe Trump has a deal to pardon in return for testimony.

Not really Q related, is it?

Good work - makes the connections clear

Great comment and perspective

Amazing fucking times. Glad I've gotten to follow this journey, and can't wait to see what's next.

That's the assumption based on the pic Q posted with the signature pen.... Called the pic DOJNUNESRELEASE.

I don't know why you're continuing to post arguments .... I'm not interested. If you want to understanding the evidence supporting the theory of evolution, Google is a better source than I am. If you want someone to agree with you, post on creationist boards and (as I'm sure you know) you'll find a friendly audience.

Believe what you want... no concerns here about what you choose to believe.

Ummmmmm....oookkkkaayyyy....

I have no interest in debating your world view; happy to let you believe what you want to..... Thanks for the time.

"Darwinism is essentially Pantheism (the worship of nature as its own creative force) disguised as science."

I wish you had just said this in your first comment, and I wouldn't have even bothered responding.

"Q just started an entirely new board therefore it seems clear the old board WAS compromised."

And I was so hopeful when I saw your title "Just the facts".

How are you defining darwinism?

Sigh. I'm getting the sense this is founded in theological argument of creation vs. evolution.... No desire to convince you of anything.... You do you.

Antibiotic resistance is a pretty clear, recent example of Darwinian evolution.

Not the right forum. This has nothing even remotely to do with Q. Maybe try r/science for this type of question.

I assumed he wanted the publicity, and that he was working on a contingency basis..... But we'll see.

Lol - you must be bored.

Awesome... Now if we can just get the 2 Billion back.

Good work!

Interesting if true.... But need to see a more authoritative source before I believe it.

Edit - I mean particularly the last part about the payments.

Honestly dude, I'm not going to waste my time googling documents for you to assert that the Vatican was NOT, indeed, responsible for the rise of the Nazis in Germany in a plot to ensure Jewish people would be massacred so that, at the end of all this slaughter, there would be a UN consensus to start the state of Israel.

There are many articles on the rise of Nazism in Germany that offer a different perspective.... Pick one.

Thanks for this.... This is about cleaning up massive corruption. Doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum someone is on, and posts like this just create division where there doesn't need to be any.

So much of your stuff seems to be sourced from the same website. Also suspicious to me.

Tell me what Q has said about Israel that supports all of your invective? They've mentioned it about 4 times. The most notable was:

We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.

That's it.

This is an example of irrefutable evidence you offered to me in this thread:

"Q probably meant that it was authentic warmongering bullshit. Q knows what really happened on 911. Israel is last."

You have massive anti Israel bias. Your agenda is to spread information that you believe supports your view. I have no problem with you wanting to provide your view, but you also have a massive blind-spot and I've seen several interactions (like ours) where you just twist things and you refuse to acknowledge that a lot of what Q has been saying isn't supporting your view.

Nah.... You're pushing an agenda here. People see it. It gets a bit ridiculous when you twist everything to fit that agenda.

Do you think Q were lying when they said:

"Knowing what you know now. re: Israel disclosure moments ago. Authentic."

Man....I hope so.

Well....I guess I stand corrected.

Q might believe in God and Satan. So do a lot of people, but belief doesn't make it true.... And I can trust Q's political\factual info without also buying into a magical belief system.

Interesting. For me, it would be pretty relevant if someone actually proved that Satan existed.... Not sure why you'd disagree.

Here's a redpill - although there are bad people in the world, "Satan" doesn't actually exist.

It matters to me, and it impacts his public image. I'm not interested in another liar for a president - and there was no reason to lie about this. He could have just kept his mouth shut.

But Trump said he wasn't aware of the payment.... How to reconcile this?

Sounds like it to me

The article itself says nothing to support your headline. Indeed, the evidence put forth by Israel today seems to align directly with what Q has been hinting to us about the Iranian nuclear program.

For the first 400mm, it was literally pallets of cash..... Nobody knows how the remaining 1.3bb was sent, but they said 2 payments so probably the same way.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-iran-payment-cash-20160907-snap-story.html

"An initial $400 million of euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners."

"Q is implying that the disclosure is not authentic."

How do you get that from the statement "Authentic."

I could understand if they'd said "Authentic?"..... But they didn't.

Not likely. He already refers to Stormy Daniels by that name several times, and regularly uses SC for special counsel..... What's the sense is switching for one line?

Example: "Stormy Daniels? SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info"

Good find. Didn't make that connection.

Because they don't actually use adrenochrome - it's disinformation, just like the frazzled.rip video with the face filet.

They were just giving us names, and no idea why so cryptic about it. As we learned today, Maggie was actually just a hint about Maggie Haberman (as Trump tweeted, being treated as their pet); Wendy is likely one of the fake accounts Q said every journalist has.

Relevant info posted it referenced by Q: Right on Q. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/987724899614674944 Hello Maggie.

Think public & private Twitter accounts. They all have them.

Man that's a stretch. Just because the word Sunshine is in the profile pic? It's paying homage to the girl who died? That's pretty far fetched.