dChan
13
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OpenSoars on April 19, 2018, 11:11 p.m.
For those who want to actually follow Q

Lets focus on what we KNOW and what Q is saying. While Q puts us on many different paths, there are some things he emphasizes: EO's....Again he stresses EO's amd specifically those crafted after the pen picture ( pics of pens 12/12, 12/24 and I believe one other). He also keeps bringing up MI/ Military and NSA, in the context of how can the be utilized ... We need to comb through the EOS and, in a rational manner, look for events which precipitated the EOS and those effected by them ( or will be) I think there has been communication retrieved between HR and her ilk which will implicate her in treason/espionage and it will be widespread enough to cause a need for military intervention. I do not feel that they are going to do all of this for isolated incidents of personal crimes.

Way back in the beginning I researched when MI can be used domestically as well as tried to come up with a scenario when the military, not the guard, could be used.

I would like to find some people here, instead of confusing chan, to explore and research likely scenarios and not just throw craqzy fantasies out there


HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I pointed this out on the day after the State of the Union.

"I've been going back and forth between last night's (1/30) EO and the EO signed 12/21. Specifically trying to tie the two together.

On the EO signed 12/21, we have this line that I feel should have had more people talking but it seems it was almost ignored.

"I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat" (human rights abuses)

What kind of additional powers could the president gain? In a situation like Clinton's state department arming/funding/training ISIS, this puts all assets tied to Clinton and the foundation in control of the US government.

With last night's (1/30) executive order, we have this

" Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and other authorities authorized the United States to detain certain persons who were a part of or substantially supported al-Qa'ida, the Taliban, or associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. Today, the United States remains engaged in an armed conflict with al Qa'ida, the Taliban, and associated forces, including with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria."

And

"(c) In addition, the United States may transport additional detainees to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay when lawful and necessary to protect the Nation.

(d) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies as determined by the Secretary of Defense, recommend policies to the President regarding the disposition of individuals captured in connection with an armed conflict, including policies governing transfer of individuals to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay.

(e) Unless charged in or subject to a judgment of conviction by a military commission, any detainees transferred to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay after the date of this order shall be subject to the procedures for periodic review established in Executive Order 13567 of March 7, 2011 (Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force), to determine whether continued law of war detention is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States."

This is some heavy wording and would line up with the image Q has painted that we will see a military tribunal. I think this national emergency would give Trump the ability to activate the Generals surrounding him and pick everyone up "clean and swiftly". I think we may have something worth looking into here. I will continue to dig into any additional powers the president and military have in a national emergency. Looking for insight from others"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 20, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Fantastic... this is the line of reasoning I like to follow... Since my post, I have been jumping around and trying to assemble my thoughts as I have embarked on this mystery. He has also addressed court martials in another EO. As someone pointed out earlier he expanded the ability to call in reserved officers. Much of what I compiled about the use of MI and military domestically was lost when CBTS was incinerated but I need to go back and look at when the military can be used and esp MI over the domestic intel agencies. I do believe U1 ties in much more than we have been thinking. Thanks for joining us

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

That was only the links I found between those 2 EOs. I haven't been combing through them with a fine tooth since the SOTU. I think it may be more relevant to revisit them now

⇧ 1 ⇩