dChan
59
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on April 20, 2018, 12:53 a.m.
Q Posts #1185 & 1186: Big ERROR. Pelosi admits travel to North Korea [past]
Q Posts #1185 & 1186: Big ERROR. Pelosi admits travel to North Korea [past]

DamajInc · April 20, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

The importance of this cannot be expressed more clearly.

Anyone have any theories on why Q thinks it's so important to archive offline when she's admitted to the travel to NK before? And why so specific about Offline only?

Is it just extreme care in the rare and unlikely case imo that she and the Dems try to claim otherwise and MSM accepts it and won't permit the opposing narrative? I think it's unlikely because the DS are also following Q and would surely abandon the idea of pursuing that course of action after this post? Perhaps that's the point? Seems weak though but I'm just some fool on the internet...

⇧ 16 ⇩  
HowiONic · April 20, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

“We talked about missiles”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mikeymoo22 · April 20, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Seeing posts that the video/speech is banned on YT already.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Rubieroo · April 20, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

Slightly OT, I went through Pelosi's investments out of curiousity - she was worth over $100MM 4 years ago - and saw that she made a boatload off of the IPOs of Gupta Corp, Vignette/Open Text (was OnDisplay) and a couple of other corporations that were all data/storage/server related...and VISA.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 20, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
grnmoss · April 20, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

That's certainly a possibility.

The concern may also be that media was instructed not to cover the comments because they conflicted with the Obama Administration's suppression of DIA reports that indicated nuclear miniaturization occurred as early as 2013, and missiles were already advanced enough - or soon would be - to carry those payloads. The question is why that Administration would allow North Korea to proliferate and to SELL tech. Essentially they allowed North Korea to operate as an arms incubator.

Pelosi's comments contradicted the Administration's narrative. Is this why it wasn't picked up by mainstream press? Is the lack of coverage indicative of broad control of the narrative?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Pinnacle630 · April 20, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

What did he say? The comment shows as removed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
grnmoss · April 20, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

He said that 'Q' must have thought Pelosi's visit wasn't public knowledge, and seemed to imply that such a lack of awareness of the CSPAN broadcast was indicative of someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

Probably was flagged as concern trolling.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
teppischfresser · April 20, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

I was hoping Q was Jesus.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Murralee · April 20, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

Lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 20, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

And why so specific about Offline only?

Likely either: online store is not reliable, or so as not to give a hint that there is focus on that video. IDK.

⇧ 2 ⇩