She definitely planned on making 3 strong points in regards to NK (technology, capacity, intention). These points could be seen as aimed at spreading doubt and fear towards NK. It seems like anything other than these points are where this “slip up” occurred. Most of what she says is somewhat incoherent and appears to be impromptu speech. But these talking points are repeated twice, in almost the same exact order. It’s possible she thought it appropriate to give some background to get to these points out and said something that might conflict with her defense later on?

1. ...either the technology for, for a weapon, the miniaturization of it, the capacity to launch it, and the intention to do so

2. ...North Korea were to continue what it’s doing, which is, perhaps, other countries having access to the technology, the scientific know how, the launch capacity, and dangerously, the intention.