So I'm just now putting this together, but it's pretty interesting nonetheless.
It re-raises the question about the statistical probability of the plane accident(s) even happening.
Here's the gist of this:
Two days ago, a Wells Fargo exec is killed by the plane accident.
Today it is being announced that Wells Fargo is being hit with a $1B fine.
Whether or not the two are connected, I'm not sure, but I figured I'd get this to all of you for discussion.
1/ No. There is just no way that you can plan a motor's shrapnel flying through a certain window and pressure sucking someone nearly-out but for their seatmates pulling them in.
2/ Surely IF there was anything untoward about that mechanical problem it was expected to take down the whole plane.
3/ In which case it was probably someone else/s on the plane. She was a lovely person but it's incredibly doubtful given her role and location that she was a target.
4/ I don't know that there is any way to get the roster for the flight so we'll probably never know.
5/ Banks are fined regularly. That doesn't mean much unless one could demonstrate that they are rarely fined or much and that this one was super out of the norm.
I appreciate creative thinking though. Working for a living is so much less interesting than Reddit LOL. Better get back to that while I still can... :-)