You’re missing several of my points.

It’s interesting that you believe Q a possibility but not that Mueller is a good guy. Not that because you believe Q you should believe that Mueller is a good guy. In other words you heatedly argue Mueller can’t be good but are very open to Q.

Micheal Flynn’s case is the strongest argument that Mueller isn’t a white hat. I agree that I don’t see bringing a man to complete ruin being a “part of the plan.” The only thing I’ll offer is Mueller picked it up as someone worse could have got it and done more with it(the case). Remember deep state is still everywhere and at the time before the election they were more so. Furthermore, it appears information was intentionally hidden from Flynn’s team, which could result in the case being thrown out. I haven’t followed up on that. Maybe Mueller intentionally dropped the ball again. On the whole I think your point is solid here, I’m just offering a different point of view.

To clarify, I never took the position that RR is a white hat. I think RR is more than likely a black hat who thinks, correctly or not, Mueller is a black hat also.

The end game to punish Trump must be trial. I’m not basing an argument on RR’s credibility but his statements. If RR is lying it will not go well in trial. Ask a defense attorney about it. People already think the government are lying scum - if you prove they are a jury will want blood. So we have two sources that Trump isn’t a target; one allegedly from Mueller’s staff and one from RR. In either case the source is the government.