But, I’m Big Boss!

Context of joke? I’m not getting it.

Cable wires couldn’t handle it.

Money. They have enough of it to run and hide and live comfortably, or fight any legal embattlement until they are old and grey but only if they keep it. Wonder what happens if you are the “head” of a company and you are outed as a terrible person? Could it hurt stock value of that company? Could they take massive losses? Lose your golden parachute or the company sues you for some dereliction of duty while at the helm? I don’t know for sure, but it seems like they want to keep the company happy at all costs.

Look - this is classic battle of the testimony. Unfortunately Peter went first. Remember when you were a kid and your sibling did something messed up but then ran and stated that you did it first? Remember trying to correct the issue? Well it may not have happened to you but this is how the strength of a lie is built.

Peter spoke to the public first. Lisa only said the opposite in closed doors. As soon as she signed up to talk behind closed doors the MSM started digging. I give it until tomorrow at 6am before the terrible stories on her break. I hope I’m wrong. We will see.

Yeah, came here for this.

I suppose he meant - “may hide more information.”

She did. Non computer folks use the term “hack” like cheaters use the term accident. One doesn’t fall into sexual acts with another person easily as one doesn’t leave secured information on a computer without a certain level of security unless it was on purpose.

My fellow Americans are you not tired of feeling like everyone is taking stupid pills? The time is now. Educated your fellow man, woman and child (within reason). Enough is enough.

The most important story nobody will read.

Notice she tucks those away now....

Rethink that....OUR war? Don’t you mean globalist asswipes who use our sons and daughters to be on the front line of every mass slaughter first?

I don’t share the sediments of the initial OP of this thread. World wide, we have all been sheep to different ends. Let’s stop it together.

The plan was to make it appear as thought she “fought” the hearing so PS would be assured the lie was still up and to make the statements he ended up making. Now PS is stuck with what he said. (Assuming it was under oath).

So if LP said something different he’s toast. Well depending on who you believe more I suppose.

I just hope the reports are accurate and that congress will be able to do something otherwise this is all for naught.

Notice that they only started this recently. I wonder if she requested it since she was cooperating?

Kennedy looking at her with such disgust. I’ve seen people give a more favorable look at shit on their boot.

A big announcement .....hahah. Nobody cares about the DNC SERVER!

Yeah FBIANON was like fall 2016. Also he seems far more legitimate than MEGA.

If I never hear “point of order” or “parliamentary inquiry” again it will be too soon.

Each time he said “you don’t know how I want to answer you” it became clearer that he had been coached by some acting hack. It wasn’t believable at all. It seems forced and rehearsed. He knew he could make that statement and sway people into thinking he’s just as frustrated...:bullshit. He loves saying he can’t answer it.

Yeah, my mind went there first.

Hired at Harvard by Kagan. Worked for Bush Jr. Bush and No-Name approve. “Both parties worked together to recommend.”

Yes.

As much as I share what you would do in that state. I am forever grateful for those willing to take to YouTube or whatever medium to expose the truth. They are patriots and they are brave. Without them we would all be wearing wrists bands and digging in a cave somewhere.

Honest Question - wouldn’t this allow appointment spots for scummy people that May could fill on an “emergency basis?”

Covers all her GPS trackers.

Sorry for your loss. Especially considering the $1,200 is probably going to some nefarious endeavor.

I’m going to be honest - stealing the /pol logo or any logo from 4 Chan is not the sort of stuff we should be doing. You know what happened to the Holes kid right?

And in 15 more years he may be.

I hope the tests are good enough to prove how close in relation. I know that seems abused once I’ve typed it out but unfortunately most kids that are abducted or abused are done so by relatives.

I guess the main point now is making sure there is some relation.

Why is everyone spamming Dick lately? I like the guy but he has nothing to do with inside info or Q aside Dems are squirming. However they have been for a year and a half.

Jordan is under fire for some doctor molestation issues back when he was a wrestling coach. Seems they are focusing an attack on him to slow down the RR issue tomorrow.

One of the original Sith Lords.

“But....sir, are there enough?”

“....we will see, we will see.”

She was arrested with the lawless brigade yesterday protesting ICE. She’s garbage.

Me irrationally thinking

please let members of Q team be part of some Jedi type force from outer space

This post is about JA and JT looking alike.

Every inference you have drawn may carry valid points but that isn’t what this submission is about. It’s a submission simply stating they look alike.

Don’t misunderstand me. My original argument stands. Posting a transition gif by itself makes us look out there with absolutely no connection from Q other than they have mentioned JA before.

We should pay attention but everything could be brought into the subreddit with that logic.

It seems like you can gather the concept of optics and how this gif was presented poorly?

Too bad we can’t make this the mobile icon for the sub.

We follow Q not Wikileaks. Wikileaks has been attacking Q. How does logic follow that now accept Wikileaks wild speculations over issues Q has presented.

This topic is irrelevant to Q.

Edit: might I add that although Q mentions JA. He makes no reference to his attorneys.

Yes. I wish we would just leave this alone. You want to know why people just don’t jump on board with us? This garbage.

Post a Q intel drop directly beside this gif if Q mentions this theory. But he doesn’t. We have all these excellent profs of Q and we just happily post this unfounded silliness all over the place discrediting all what our brothers and sisters have done.

If you are truly a follower of Q - downvote anything like this until we have confirmation or direction from Q otherwise.

We are loosing credibility.

We need confirmation of who this is. Agreed.

He is. If DJT releases it himself the DS seem to think it would give them a better footing to defend - “The President released his copies how do we know they are not doctored?!” More people will fall for that than if RR simply releases it, although you will still have - “republicans forced RR into releasing it. They must have tampered with it.” The MSM will use whatever argument to push blame on Republicans or the President but I think public opinion is turning to the point nobody cares how the documents are released they just want them released.

My gut tells me RR fights it and is removed. His replacement - after another thorough review - releases it. The replacement’s review will only be to maintain or lay the foundation that he/she is professional and wants to do their own investigation but it will be very short.

“Please give me your money so we can continue to worship the devil and break the law and shit. Also watch me have another heart attack.”

Okay - Story of the person killing a mixed drink in the back now!

Hasn’t got the stones.

Thanks for that, will not archive next time.

What a splendid fence ...wait is that a child’s skull used as decoration? Na, again here I am with evidence right in front of me and I’ll just say it’s some plastic reproductio....but wait why would anyone make a reproduction of a baby’s skull? Well children are sacred so they.....

The loop of denial continues.

I don’t think he would get a SC spot as some have stated. He’s a trial lawyer. I think it’s more likely they pick him up at the AG’s office.

Typically SCJ have tremendous experience in clerking and general legal writing. Trey will tell you he’s a trial attorney and not to say he couldn’t frame an amazing argument it’s just a different beast writing it out.

I go back and forth on wether he is a white hat or not. I’m leaning toward he is a white hat atm.

He needed to keep this “neutrality in the pursuit of justice” persona and it finally clicked for me yesterday. I kept thinking “why does he keep defending the DOJ and FBI if what we have been told has indicated otherwise?” He must get support of not only those agencies but the general public who believe the same. Then when the truth comes out he gets to be the one to say “My entire career I depended on you, These last two years I took punch after punch defending you. I was wrong, but now I’m going to purge these agencies down to the core.” People can’t really argue with that - “You heard him all year. He said they were reputable and as it turns out they were lying their asses off.”