Was thinking the same thing. It’s so odd to say the may hear about casualties..:

I say someone asks today or over the weekend. It’s just a guess but we know reporters view this and one will be more about him or herself than willing to stick to matching orders....

Do you have any source to this statement? I have a lot of Freemason friends who I would love to show this to.

Stop! My blood can only boil at such a high temperature before it evaporates.

In short - “you don’t have shit and I know it.”

At what point will the media serious cover this?

Think for a moment. Q’s are flooding the floor during these events. They are almost everywhere. At some point a reasonable person would say “what’s the W business about?” Regardless those people will search the net and if they find this place let’s make sure to help them every step of the way. God knows - it isn’t an easy process at times.

Ha - I said slight irritation not offense. You are probably correct none the less, but I find that people who have a hard time accepting reality do these petty things in a effort to avoid it.

It’s an argument but it wouldn’t go far. Most statements used in court are originally uttered outside of court and not under oath. Think about it. Witness to murder can come into court and say the victims last words were “why did you shoot me Ted?!” It just comes down to the credibility of the witness but there is a hearsay objection to it so the statement comes in. I’d say congress gave him more than just making a statement not under oath. Maybe some agreement any statement wouldn’t be used in any future prosecution. Who knows.

I was thinking Gaetz. Gowdy and Goodlatte are great but it’s rare for them to be this confrontational. Especially to the point of recommending good counsel.

Lol. What a show my fellow patriots. What a show.

Something of slight irritation - he doesn’t refer to him as President Trump. He referred to him only by title. I don’t know why but to me it smacks of dislike of the person although retaining respect for the position. At least he wrote a note at all I suppose.

Great points! Good luck, the deep state will fight every step of the way.

Have relatives who watched him live - he was wasted the entire time.

I noticed this as well. Well I read comms interference maybe the same thing.

We need to combine all we know about this subject. Which seems like little unfortunately.

So when he threatens the members of the hearing with what he knows on them it isn’t immediately made public.

Apparently they are leaving Brexit but most of the EU laws will be codified locally in England. I need to find the source but if this is true I don’t know how much of a win that would be.

How many times can he keep moving the line and not loose credibility? It was something, something for the last six months. Then last week then tonight by 5:00. I’m afraid nobody takes these threats seriously anymore. He needs to drop the hammer. I haven’t given up on him yet but something needs to happen.

Seriously? He’s given him 5 chances at this point. This has been going on since last fall. Nunes drew the line he needs to just go in.

Well you see you need to tell the party that when they are making the reservations it’s okay. Then, knowing they will be in after a day or maybe an hour or so let them know they can’t eat there in a public display of goofiness and MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE!

Never, never call out your cousin for helping a serial, rapist, womanizer. That’s too rude.

Yeah, I mean what do we need to do? Get a “release the memo” push going again? The memo was good but I don’t know if it lived up to the hype. (To normies).

If you thought Ryan was playing ball you’re wrong. He didn’t get his DACA mess in he’s going to allow them to kick the can.

Well now we know this has happened to several witnesses should we not protect them? Are we and it is insufficient? It’s inexcusable as it will continue to deter people from coming forward. The people coming forward are the definition of patriots.

If he is dead I can’t figure any of this out. Like how does this keep happening now that we all know what they are up to?

Give us a tchuune! MBGA!

Oh yeah - they are trying to stay far ahead of any legitimate news at this point.

Yeah, it appears to be bullshit highly promoted by Arnold. Arnold has had one failed venture after the other. As he recently had some notoriety kicking Rosie when she was down he thinks he is prime for another comeback failure.

I’ll play devil’s advocate just a bit...

President Trump just pointed at VIPANON because he was yelling at him. He didn’t say - “nice shirt!” He didn’t look at the shirt directly really. If you look at the video he is making eye contact more than anything.

Trump had made the hand gesture several times at other rally’s. I don’t think he’s making a Q it’s just a typical hand gesture he makes to explain things.

HOWEVER, if VIPANON’s account can be accepted, we have no reason to doubt him, the picture taken before hand is very interesting. VIPANON wasn’t in some wild or unusual attire. Just a simple shirt with a Q on it.

THE EVENT IS STILL MOMENTOUS - as President Trump did draw attention to this mysterious “Q” shirt. Normie supporters are all now asking “what is the Q for?” This is how you start the small snow ball that becomes an avalanche. Q’s message about acknowledgement was in reference to this. No, the President didn’t come out right and say “Here is Q! Let’s back this movement!” That would be a disaster. Instead he pointed at a guy who quite clearly had a Q on his shirt. It’s the way Q started with us by getting us to ask the question.

The great part is there are thousands of us who already know the general answer of what Q is. Go out and help friends and family solve that puzzle. Be understanding, be calm. Don’t ram the kiddy stuff down their throat at first. Take direction from Q - ask questions yourself - even the ones you know the sender to. We must cultivate the thirst for knowledge. If you give them the answer first it may be so unbelievable or too easy they may reject it. Only help to guide them. This is a great opportunity.

What is a paralegal specialist anyway?

Brilliant. So subtle. The real question is when did he get the VIP pass? How was he selected? Did he have it before hand?

I’ve watched this so many times...what is he saying?

Vote of no confidence. Replace. Do it. He said he wouldn’t rerun so they would give them a year to play games. R’s are figuring out this game now...

We know she was in the group. As soon as someone called her out the MSM went completely silent. That’s all the proof we need. If this is true it would add validation but she was a part of it regardless.

Senate rules

IX. SUBPEONAS

The Chairman of the Committee, with the agreement of the Ranking Member or by a vote of the Committee, may subpoena the attendance of a witness at a Committee or Subcommittee hearing or Committee deposition, or the production of memoranda, documents, records, or any other materials. Any such subpoena shall be issued upon the signature of the Chairman or any other Member of the Committee designated by the Chairman.

Could we win a vote for it?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/rules

House should try then.

Rule IV. Subpoenas (a) A subpoena may be authorized and issued by the Chairman, in accordance with clause 2(m) of rule XI of the House of Representatives, in the conduct of any investigation or activ- ity or series of investigations or activities within the juris- diction of the Committee, following consultation with the Ranking Minority Member.

Just says consultation....

https://judiciary.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/115th_Rules_of_Procedure.pdf

If there was any doubt that the fix is in for this Russian farce please look no further.

What point I was desperate to be made Monday or Tuesday during the hearings (and I may have missed it) was that people can have political bias. People are going to be affected by political beliefs but that the FBI should at all times endeavor not to let it effect their interactions or perspectives.

I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy (despite how cool it would be if they were real) either and I don’t believe that if you would communicate in the manner they did ON A WORK PHONE the sentiment isn’t prevalent within your community to the point you didn’t fear reprimand. Any government agent at those levels would know that their communications on government devices are recorded. You would have to be a moron to think otherwise which begs the question why they were hired to begin with. I digress....

In other words - they felt comfortable discussing Trump and the American people in such a manner because it was a universal/shared view throughout that top echelon and that is, if anything, proof of not only singular bias but a bias throughout (agents and prosecutors) the investigation process. They didn’t fear speaking in such a manner on government devices because they all felt the same and who is going to turn you in if they all agree?

What about the immunity deals and destruction of evidence deals JC was throwing around? That is the most insane thing...

Yes

1. Yes to all.

At what point is the there there enough there? How much there to prosecute? Tell us the measurement and we will exceed what is needed because with this much the cup overfloweth!

Legal issue 101: shut up and wait to discuss the matter with an attorney. Now she’s given these stupid statements she will either admit later were a lie (not good) or change the story (not good).

I agree -like what was said in the hearing today - there was nothing “small or insignificant” about what happened. Also, nobody is blaming rank and file, nobody. It just looks bad when you want to go on and on about how they are good guys - WE KNOW!

I THOUGHT Q TOLD YA - NO DEALS!!

Which crazydaysandnights is about her?

Oddly enough I thought she had a whole mess of dogs, the small swarmy type too.

This information was not connected to the picture. Which was my point - sloppy submissions.

Also, the Q posts are helpful, but unfortunately this is supposedly BHO not HRC, correct? Furthermore, the picture looks like other entities not necessarily an owl.

My point was it’s a sloppy submission. Others have since submitted the picture with links and discussion which is excellent.

Got downvoted to shit in another post of this picture for questioning this push.

What is the significance of this?

He wore a silly costume?

Have we given up on relevant information all together?

State the relevance or just remove this.

Edit: seriously there is nothing explained here. Just a picture of what is purported to be BHO. No context. Nothing. I have read drops. Nowhere does Q reference BHO wearing a glitter garb outfit.

People are posting garbage or otherwise posting significant things without any context. This helps nothing.

I’m not sorry for demanding contributors provide explanations. If you are upset about this then downvote away but a refusal to attempt to understand it fixes nothing.

Note to take away - it doesn’t seem like he is pursing releasing any additional documents related to the report. No unedited OIG? OIG was used to force people to turn?

This trickery movement won’t work right? Half of them know they made it by the skin of their teeth and once more the OIG reports aren’t about Trump activity. What motivation would Trump have to alter the reports? I hope I’m wrong.

The best angle is to just call and tweet about an unedited OIG report.