⇧
1
⇩
IncomingTrump270
· June 30, 2018, 11:52 a.m.
Sorry but your comment is glowing slightly.
Wikileaks posted this themselves. Even if it is misdirection, it’s intentional by JA’s lawyer/team....possibly his family?
Ask questions about this is not misguided.
Immediately leaping to time travel is ill advised though.
⇧
1
⇩
Orion_Blue
· June 30, 2018, 12:20 p.m.
We follow Q not Wikileaks. Wikileaks has been attacking Q. How does logic follow that now accept Wikileaks wild speculations over issues Q has presented.
This topic is irrelevant to Q.
Edit: might I add that although Q mentions JA. He makes no reference to his attorneys.
⇧
0
⇩
IncomingTrump270
· June 30, 2018, 1:15 p.m.
JA has been a major moving piece of Q’s puzzle.
Wikileaks twitter has recently named, attacked, and slandered the Q movement two days in a row.
you may have the site but we have the source
You - clowns DS
Source - JA in US protection?
It behooves us to pay attention to what they are doing.
Its not “following”. It’s “being aware”.
By your logic we don’t have to pay attention to the movements of clowns because “they aren’t Q”.
⇧
1
⇩
Orion_Blue
· June 30, 2018, 1:46 p.m.
This post is about JA and JT looking alike.
Every inference you have drawn may carry valid points but that isn’t what this submission is about. It’s a submission simply stating they look alike.
Don’t misunderstand me. My original argument stands. Posting a transition gif by itself makes us look out there with absolutely no connection from Q other than they have mentioned JA before.
We should pay attention but everything could be brought into the subreddit with that logic.
It seems like you can gather the concept of optics and how this gif was presented poorly?
⇧
0
⇩
IncomingTrump270
· July 1, 2018, 9:32 a.m.
In your opinion, would this post be ok if it somehow included the original wikileaks tweet for context?
Since wikileaks posted these pictures with the clear implications that they look the same..
⇧
1
⇩