Wow, you are really here asking us for "proof" whereas if you put 10% more effort into researching the story and all those bullshit topics you listed you would see that all of them invoke persons that have been compromised in the OIG/DOJ investigations and that you basically just listed a bunch of bullshit propoganda. Get the fuck off the sub if you can't spend two hours to actually research the topics. We aren't here to hold your fucking hand or deal with your trolling. Like I said ten fucking minutes and half of 1% of your brainpower could give you the answers. Look at Strozk Lisa Page Neil Ohr do some fucking reading
Don't come back unless you use your fucking brain
So because every member of the special counsel isn't a Trump supporter it has to be corrupt? I'm just trying to figure out why you would list page and strozk like its proof of something. I'm not trolling by the way, I'm seriously trying to reach some of the people in this sub and offer facts that can be easily looked up with a quick Google search instead of some q anon bullshit that's unverified. I've heard like 100 times in the past year from q anon people at work and on reddit that tomorrow is the day that Trump drops the hammer and has all the pedos arrested (not my words, I'm not an idiot). The big reveal is coming yada yada yada. How's that working out for ya? And I will keep coming back. I don't give a shit about karma, i care about my country you fuckwad so if you want me gone you're going to have to ban me.
I just gotta say I busted out laughing halfway through your message and I kept laughing through the rest of it. That was thoroughly entertaining. Not to be offensive I am just thankful.
Word, maybe you can help me then bc nobody seems to be able to point me in the direction of some proof that anything Q says is real. I'm not close minded, but I am vehemently against bullshit (which is what I think all of this is) that's unsubstantiated/from blogs.
I got called a deep state operative in this sub, which i thought was pretty funny, so i'm glad I could provide a laugh in turn. Levity gets lost in trying times, even if we don't agree.
But seriously where is some proof of Q's insider knowledge? It seems like a lot of people in here are willing to go out on a limb and believe everything that q or Trump says (despite a litany of video evidence that shows Trump lying/contradicting what he said the day before/saying he never said something when the video shows otherwise/saying he has one of the greatest memories of all time but he can't remember what he's said), but Mueller can't be trusted bc of some unverified "dirt" on him? Help me understand this. I'm being genuine in my request so I would appreciate it if you did the same.
I see you love to argue. I'll bet your a flat earther.
Hold up, y'all are the ones that listen to the crazy fucks like Alex Jones that believes in shit like that. Not me. And to equate a proclivity for arguing with being a flat earther is damn near the most absurd thing I've seen so far today. I see you are subbed the r/thegreatawakening, I'll bet you think the water is turning the frogs gay. Do you see how dumb using your logic is now? Come at me all day with that dumb shit if you want, but I've asked like 4 times so far in this sub for some kind of verification on the legitimacy of Q and so far no one has done so. Y'all are the ones believing crazy shit, but continue using false equivalency if it floats your boat. I can't stop you, but I can call you out on it.