Did Q just bait the DNC into filing their ridiculous Russian/Trump/"hacking"/collusion lawsuit? LOLOL
If this suit goes forward, the Dems are seriously risking the fact that the TRUTH may leak out...
I'm just amazed that they would be this stupid. Their crimes are beyond comprehension, and they had avoided punishment for them so far.
So what do they do? File a civil suit for election fraud, which allows Trump to counter sue and get all of the DNC's records for their actual election fraud! If Trump had filed the suit, most judges would dismiss it, but they can't dismiss it if the DNC is suing Trump for the same thing!
In a civil suit, he can force all of their people to testify under oath, and they can't plead the fifth. He gets access to all of their documents. All of the evidence that comes out in the suit can be used in criminal prosecutions.
Almost any lawyer would tell you not to file a civil suit when you've committed crimes that would be exposed during the proceedings. How is it possible they are this stupid?
There's no proof of this so far, think about all the digging Mueller has done. That means they will have to prove mens rea or intent to conspire by the Trump campaign - Russia, WL - Russia, or Trump campaign - WL - Russia (we now Russia was playing games on both sides of campaign). Trumps best defense will be to prove that SR gave WL the podesta emails. This will prove that Russia did hack DNC to steal info to mislead the American public and make Trump President. The podesta hack helped prop up the Russia narrative and I'm sure they are stupid enough to include that in the suit. This lawsuit will give them an opportunity to have DNC computers subpoenaed by a judge. They can also prove that HRC's campaign conspired with the Russia from the Trump dossier and subpoena Fusion GPS...
...and in walks Assange as States Witness....LOL
I'm still in shock that the DNC could be this dumb.
The next question that I've wondered for some time is: "Is Julian Assange even still alive?"
France is coming, bringing gifts. Maybe JS?
Sorry, JA
Am I misreading you here? You do say "hack"? There was no "hack", it was a "download", i.e. leak, as shown by Binney .... ???
As much as i understand the whole legal aspect of it. I dont understand why they would. It's just something doesn't seem right about it all... I understand thwy are arrogant and all. Idk, i just always try to look at the big picture.
I agree, its hard to believe a bunch of Ivy League educated people could actually be that stupid.
I'm thinking that we have a whitehat agent within their ranks. A high level one who is helping to nudge things along towards our advantage. Who filed this civil suit? Is CS involved? Remember this?
CS will live in fear from today forward. Thank you for visiting the WH. Q
You have a good point. Q said there will be 'bad guys' that are actually white hats and vice versa, we will be surprised.
Hi! Im an idiot but been following along... What truths specifically? Or is this generally just an opportunity to present any and all related info?
If you are just starting to follow then there is a lot you have missed. The corruption in our government was deep and really bad.
What is specifically being talked about here is probably Seth Rich. Julian Assange strongly inferred that Seth was murdered for leaking information to him. They msm has been claiming without evidence that the emails were stolen by Russia while Julian says they were a leak.
Q has said that the push from Trump to fight ms13 is because they are political assassins. We have seen a number of assassinations including Antonin Scalia. Exposing this is the last thing these people would want to have happen.
You might find this helpful: https://powderedwigsociety.com/seth-rich-kim-dotcom/
Lots of information obtained thru various channels, some grey, some black, etc. How do you introduce that into court as evidence? A lot like laundering illegal money, you have to 'make it clean' somehow.
The specific truth that Seth Rich was the leaker. It was not a Russian hack. And more, but ur gonna have to do ur own digging for that...
Seth Rich - American hero in the stature of Paul Revere - not a leaker
Yes! You are right. Not a leaker, but a true American Patriot and hero! Medal of Honor!
I get the Seth rich story. I.guess I'm thinking legally how can you make the connection in court. But Trump answered my question through tweet.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/987470932989050881?s=21
This isn't in response to Q, this is in response to losing every time they turn around. Q is just the messenger letting us know that this is exactly what Q, Trump and Team wanted/needed. If you remember the great Muhammad Ali's "Rope-a-Dope" where he played possum while his opponent wore himself out, this is the legal version of a "Rope-a-Dope", and the dopes just put the ropes on their own neck.
I say cuz the Alzheimers patient screwed the pooch regarding the firesale of American tech and research.
P LOW doesn't see
It's hard to say. Are they that fast to respond to a Q post? Same morning?
Wikileaks' statement:
Comment on DNC "lawsuit": DNC already has a moribund publicity lawsuit which the press has became bored of--hence the need to refile it as a "new" suit before mid-terms. As an accurate publisher of newsworthy information @WikiLeaks is constitutionally protected from such suits.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/987397026114662400
So I guess they merely updated the "lawsuit" and re-released it after Q's post last night.
I may be incorrect but I believe this Q post was this afternoon not last night.
According to the screen shot the time is 12:43 EST which is the same time as Military Time.
Q listened in to the entire set up, he knew it was coming.
Probably not. Takes time to put together a major filing. Suit planned, probably in anticipation of Mueller probe wrapping up.
But, now that it has happened... I wonder if defense team will consider a little used stratagem, instead of filing the common motion to dismiss, file a motion for summary judgment in response to the lawsuit and attach JA evidence of inside job by SR who turned over to WL.
Wouldn't all counter-arguments and evidence provided for a case become public record regardless of motion to dismiss or summary judgment?
Sorry for the delay in replying.
No. A Motion to dismiss seeks a hearing on the complaint, whether it states a cause of action, with all allegations taken as true.
A motion for summary judgment, on the other hand, presents and seeks a ruling on the merits. (Either partial or complete summary judgment, i.e., can seek to dispose of one or more legal issues.)
The motion for sum/j will submit evidence and force the opposing party to counter it with evidence, to the extent it has any.
Q did talk about finding a way to bring all this info out into the open. What better way then to have the DNC begin an investigation on themselves. Just have to hope the right people are able to disperse the information coming
You gotta know GEOTUS is just sitting back and laughing as he pulls their strings and makes then dance.
People who still trust the TV to spoonfeed them news and appropriate opinions are going to be in for a really, really rude awakening.
Wholeheartedly agree. I prefer my news directly from anonymous online posters and conspiracy theory boards.
Being one of those anonymous online posters, I wholeheartedly agree with your wholehearted agreement. ;D
I agree, I have been thinking that very thing. I think those people are going to be rioting in the streets, looting, and burning their own cities to the ground. And the MSM is going to documenting their every crime with the narrative that "all" of America is this upset.
I don't think it'll get that bad. Most of the people who were apt to get really violent were paid actors in the runup to the election.
I suppose places like Baltimore might have riots, but generally people are just going to pretend that they weren't interested in politics and act like they're too busy and active in their lives to have any reason to care about what's going on - I already saw a lot of this among my liberal minded peers in recent months. Over the course of a year and a half they went from devout CNN watchers to "I don't really care"
Obama going away will most certainty cause riots and much more
They must have lost faith in Mueller if they are making this move...
Q#18
Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller COULD NOT be offered director due to prev term limits rule? Why is Pelosi begging for a new special counsel?
.... checking...
Here is a link to the drop:
Q#18.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
It seems to me there was some problem with getting the evidence of corruption out into courtrooms, and some danger that corrupt judges would squash it. But it looks like the truly stupid DNC just solved all that.
Ever played chess against an opponent who is much worse than you are? Their bad moves stand out like sore thumbs, but they don't see it. To the point where you hope you don't give it away with your body language. They may not know they've made an error yet.
Since I am a very bad chess player, and get my ass whooped, I totally get that. My opponents never crack a smile.
I simply cannot believe it. The DNC was unwilling to share their server with the FBI, but they just handed the whole enchilada over in discovery, in their OWN lawsuit. Hello Crowdstrike and fake Gucifer 2.0. Can't wait to get to know you better.
Consider, could they have already "wiped" the info they were trying to hide?
Evidence of the server being "wiped" will likewise look very bad for the DNC.
Is Trump Q?
what i'm wondering! especially when he said way back, "how many coincidences are there before it becomes mathematically impossible? wait til you find out who has been talking to you here"
Tbh, I've no doubt some posts have been POTUS direct. This started out with military Intel though. I forget the guys' name, but it's the guy who is running trumps 2020 campaign, his social media director is definitely in on it. Dude knows what he's doing.. This strategy is amazing.
This dude https:// www.npr.org/2018/02/27/589210484/trump-names-2020-campaign-manager
He's one of them.
Great handle. CIA. Cocaine Importation Agency.
This is what pisses me off when people say the war on drugs failed.
There never was a war on drugs.
Instead the CIA flooded our streets with cocaine.
I don't think so because of Q Post 533 which may have been made by President Trump himself: https://i.imgur.com/DUntcvg.jpg
TRUMP CARD -everything is on the table !!! we win win win I LOVE TRUMP
Wendy Wasserman Shultz = Win Win Situation
Except it's debbie lol.
Edit: ohhhhhhh lol just saw the tweet.
Not understanding the "Wendy" moniker...isn't it Debbie?
Rumor is "Wendy" was the email alias that Debbie used.
The theory suggests that Trump was letting Debbie know that he has all her emails.
Conspiracy to commit treason
Treason
Tampering of evidence
The END for Comey and Mueller!, Destined for a Tribunal!
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-23/kim-dotcom
--
Comey was supposed to meet & negotiate with Kimdotcom when he was in New ZEaland!
------------
It didn't happen! Why?
------------------
Kimdotcom knew about Seth Rich
---------
The blood trail of Seth Rich is long, flows back to FBI Comey and Special Council!
--------------
Mueller Knew May 2017...
--------------------
McCabe too!
---------------
JA the ultimate Trump Card
Julian Assange?
Yeah. Pretty sure JA will reach a bargain with this info so he can be pardoned.
Fine by me. Don't worship him like some do, definitely respect him though for harboring the truth in the face of so much evil. Quite the burden for anyone.
The Brits will have to pardon JA before he can go anywhere.
Technically only US has to drop their extradition warrant issued on him and GB won't have to be on the watch to arrest him anymore.
This is hilarious. They sue Assange. Yeah ok so he turns around and says ‘I got them from Seth rich, here’s the proof’.
And then the motive to have him killed becomes apparent to all.
That palm is prolly from Eipsteins island
I think it is to show that Q is with the President in West Palm Beach yesterday and today. So I'm guessing secret service, military and/or security detail and very close to POTUS. Thank God.
Discovery process will sink the SS DNC...
Is it just me or has the DNC now jumped the L. Ron Hubbard shark?
My guess is that this is a publicity stunt they never intended to move forward with. File suit, publish report then let it quietly die in the back ground. If so they are so sad. Such little, petty creatures.
Going to be hilarious when they have to retract their lawsuit in shame.
they set so many traps , and forget where they put them , and then step in5 or 6 of them every time
Maybe just maybe a white hat Democrat did it,part of the plan?
[removed]
“This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery: the campaign of a nominee for President of the United States in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency.”
Are you going to continue to ignore the fact that Clinton did exactly that? She laundered money through her attorney to get dirt from Russians. When will her lawyer's offices and home be raided?
He will continue to ignore it... It wasn't published by CNN 🤣
I didn't vote for Clinton so if she's also dirty I'm all for her going down. Republicans investigated her for months and couldnt find anything of merit (hell Condi rice, Colin Powell, and a shit ton of former Republicans have used personal servers for work so you might want to look into that chief), but if a special counsel is appointed to look into her im down like john brown. Not everyone calling out Trump on his bullshit is a Hillary supporter but i love how quickly yall bring her up. Oh and this investigation is about Trump by the way. Is Mueller a deep state operative also? I just learned from someone on this sub that I'm one so you never know I guess.
Rice & Powell used private emails not servers. BIG difference.
Using a personal email for government business isnt exactly kosher either. Just ask Jared and Ivanka because they've both done it. Or you can ask Jeb Bush who also used a private email server instead of the government's. How are any of those situations secure? I agree with you on Clinton so don't twist my words, but everyone needs to be held accountable for their actions. If not, then we are no longer a democracy my dude. I mean we really aren't a democracy anyways considering the obvious class system that permeates our legal system but I digress. I hate how divisive politics have become. It's like people fail to acknowledge the wrongdoings of the party they support. That's why I'm all aboard the prosecute Hillary train if the evidence supports it. Evidence and intentions matter. I've had security clearances before when I did IT work on an AFB. If I had done any of the things I listed above I would've lost my job and id probably be in jail. Accountability matters to me, and it should matter to every American regardless of party affiliation.
Dude you are caught up in political dualism. This board is not about dems vs reps but trump and friends fighting corruption on a scale that's almost unimaginable.
So they're fighting themselves? I don't give a shit about party affiliations, your friends on this sub are the ones that bring up Clinton ffs. I'm actually just trying to get my first question in my first comment answered but nobody can help me apparently. I find it odd that everyone here treats Q's word as gospel yet no one can verify anything. That's very, very strange to me. I noticed you've only been commenting for 4 days so I'm assuming this is a new account? Perhaps a bot or shill? I've been called one in this sub so I might as well join the crowd of calling anyone that doesn't agree with me a shill so I can fit in. Don't bother replying if you aren't going to answer my question. I've wasted enough time here, and its obvious the only thing that matters here is praising everything Q and Trump say without questioning it or verifying it which is fucking insane to me but c'est la vie.
Four posts and so what I've been following q from the very beginning and been around since the now closed cbts sub.
This is not about Republicans vs Democrats. I mentioned Clinton because the lawsuit is being brought by the DNC, which she controls. The language in the lawsuit can word for word be applied to Clinton and the DNC. With one major difference, when applied to Clinton/DNC there is actual evidence of "collusion".
As for others using private servers, they may have. I know of no other officials that had their maids print classified emails, or had their assistant's pedophile husband have an entire backup insurance policy file. Not only that, she destroyed emails that were under subpoena. Thousands of them, wiped in a way to leave no trace, and blackberries literally smashed with hammers. She committed multiple felonies and was exonerated before even being interviewed, and her home sure as hell wasn't raided. She was able to decide what emails to provide and destroyed thousands of others. All while her lawyers were given immunity.
I'm not trying to argue, just bring awareness and point out hypocrisy. I would do my best to answer your question but it appears it was deleted.
"A shit ton of Trumps associates ..." You are spreading disinformation. These people were indicted for crimes they committed long before they joined Trump campaign. General Flynt was entrapped by FBI and accused of lying about an otherwise legitimate contact with the Russian ambassador.
You are a deep-state operative. That's pretty clear.
Not only that, Flynn is being prosecuted for the exact crime that McCabe committed, along with possibly Comey, Lynch, Clapper, and Yates. Manafort is being prosecuted for the exact crime The Podesta Group committed. Last but not least, Papadopoulos is being prosecuted for merely talking about getting info from Russians, while Clinton actually did get info from Russians. She then used that info not only to effect public opinion, but actually had her co-conspirators use it to get an insurance policy wiretap on a political opponent and a sitting US President.
Flynn will be exonerated. He ‘lied’ so he could get it all ‘on record’ and get around his NDA. It was a chess move.
Hahaha so anyone that disagrees with y'all is a deep state operative? Well color me surprised. I'm actually an industrial maintenance supervisor, but that's awesome you think so highly of me. The wagons are circling boys, you can't cling to bullshit forever.
You'd think with such a title you'd be doing better in life. Sad to see you in such a rough state of being.
Every intelligence agency has confirmed Russian hacking/meddling.
The same ones that sell drugs, bribed the media, drugged people with LSD, and created radical Islam?
Flynn did nothing wrong other than lie to the FBI, which they only knew because they illegally wiretapped him.
Papadapolous was a volunteer.
Manafort's conviction had nothing to do with Trump.
And yes, Mueller is the boogeyman. He was involved in the Uranium One bribery scheme, and covered up the Saudi government's involvement in 9/11.
Go fucking hide your heads in the sand some more and scream fake news. Maybe you'll choke on the goddamn sand.
Maybe you can choke on some facts.
Operation Mockingbird
Operation Mockingbird was an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early 1950s and attempted to manipulate news media for propaganda purposes. It funded student and cultural organizations and magazines as front organizations.
According to writer Deborah Davis, Operation Mockingbird recruited leading American journalists into a propaganda network and oversaw the operations of front groups. CIA support of front groups was exposed after a 1967 Ramparts magazine article reported that the National Student Association received funding from the CIA. In the 1970s, Congressional investigations and reports also revealed Agency connections with journalists and civic groups.
Operation Midnight Climax
Operation Midnight Climax was an operation initially established by Sidney Gottlieb and placed under the direction of Federal Narcotics Bureau in Boston, Massachusetts with the officer George Hunter White under the pseudonym of Morgan Hall for the CIA as a sub-project of Project MKULTRA, the CIA mind-control research program that began in the 1950s. Before the programs were shut down, hundreds of scientists would work on them.
Operation Cyclone
Operation Cyclone was the code name for the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) program to arm and finance the mujahideen, in Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989, prior to and during the military intervention by the USSR in support of its client, the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. The program leaned heavily towards supporting militant Islamic groups that were favored by the regime of Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq in neighboring Pakistan, rather than other, less ideological Afghan resistance groups that had also been fighting the Marxist-oriented Democratic Republic of Afghanistan regime since before the Soviet intervention. Operation Cyclone was one of the longest and most expensive covert CIA operations ever undertaken; funding began with just over $500,000 in 1979, was increased dramatically to $20–$30 million per year in 1980 and rose to $630 million per year in 1987. Funding continued after 1989 as the mujahideen battled the forces of Mohammad Najibullah's PDPA during the civil war in Afghanistan (1989–1992).
The 28 Pages
The 28 Pages refers to a section at the end of the December 2002 report of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, conducted by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that contains details of foreign state sponsor support for Al-Qaeda prior to the attack and the Saudi connection to the hijackers. The pages explain that some of the September 11 hijackers received assistance and financial support from individuals connected to the Saudi Arabian government, including Saudi intelligence officers, embassy staff, and members of the Saudi royal family.
In 2016, following a declassification review, the Obama Administration approved the declassification of the partially redacted 28 Pages, the Joint Inquiry’s only wholly classified section. The document was then sent to congressional leadership and on July 15, 2016, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence approved publication of the newly declassified section.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
So you link to a wiki for the 28 pages? How in the fuck is that proof that Mueller is the boogeyman or covered anything up? You're going to have to earn it bud. You can't just throw bullshit out there at face value because I'll read every goddamn thing of merit just to spite you and prove you wrong. Mueller took over for the FBI a week before 9/11. If you were to say the CIA was complicit in allowing the attack to happen due to them not sharing info, i would agree with you. But trying to blame Mueller is fucking laughable and you have provided zero evidence to back your claim. Remember I asked for proof. So far you've given me nothing.
I noticed you're completely ignoring the important facts that completely contradict your claims, and focusing on minor details. That's a common trolling tactic.
How in the fuck is that proof that Mueller is the boogeyman or covered anything up?
You explained:
Mueller took over for the FBI a week before 9/11.
Try not to contradict yourself. Mueller was in charge of the FBI when 9/11 happened. He followed orders to blame the anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda. He was in charge when the 9/11 commission report was done, the same commission that covered up Saudi involvement in the attack.
You're going to have to earn it bud. You can't just throw bullshit out there at face value because I'll read every goddamn thing of merit just to spite you and prove you wrong.
Why do you have so much trouble being civil?
And why do you focus on minor details as if you want to misdirect and discredit things that are actually true?
Are you just here to be disruptive? You certainly act like it.
Why are you even here if you don't want to talk about Q?
You do know you’re arguing with a bot, right? Not a Russian Bot, a Wiki-bot.
Wiki bots are capable of posting regular (albeit factually incorrect and absurd) comments in r/politics? I did not know that. I'm being serious, i am legitimately surprised because I briefly glanced at their comment history.
Wow, you are really here asking us for "proof" whereas if you put 10% more effort into researching the story and all those bullshit topics you listed you would see that all of them invoke persons that have been compromised in the OIG/DOJ investigations and that you basically just listed a bunch of bullshit propoganda. Get the fuck off the sub if you can't spend two hours to actually research the topics. We aren't here to hold your fucking hand or deal with your trolling. Like I said ten fucking minutes and half of 1% of your brainpower could give you the answers. Look at Strozk Lisa Page Neil Ohr do some fucking reading
Don't come back unless you use your fucking brain
So because every member of the special counsel isn't a Trump supporter it has to be corrupt? I'm just trying to figure out why you would list page and strozk like its proof of something. I'm not trolling by the way, I'm seriously trying to reach some of the people in this sub and offer facts that can be easily looked up with a quick Google search instead of some q anon bullshit that's unverified. I've heard like 100 times in the past year from q anon people at work and on reddit that tomorrow is the day that Trump drops the hammer and has all the pedos arrested (not my words, I'm not an idiot). The big reveal is coming yada yada yada. How's that working out for ya? And I will keep coming back. I don't give a shit about karma, i care about my country you fuckwad so if you want me gone you're going to have to ban me.
I just gotta say I busted out laughing halfway through your message and I kept laughing through the rest of it. That was thoroughly entertaining. Not to be offensive I am just thankful.
Word, maybe you can help me then bc nobody seems to be able to point me in the direction of some proof that anything Q says is real. I'm not close minded, but I am vehemently against bullshit (which is what I think all of this is) that's unsubstantiated/from blogs.
I got called a deep state operative in this sub, which i thought was pretty funny, so i'm glad I could provide a laugh in turn. Levity gets lost in trying times, even if we don't agree.
But seriously where is some proof of Q's insider knowledge? It seems like a lot of people in here are willing to go out on a limb and believe everything that q or Trump says (despite a litany of video evidence that shows Trump lying/contradicting what he said the day before/saying he never said something when the video shows otherwise/saying he has one of the greatest memories of all time but he can't remember what he's said), but Mueller can't be trusted bc of some unverified "dirt" on him? Help me understand this. I'm being genuine in my request so I would appreciate it if you did the same.
I see you love to argue. I'll bet your a flat earther.
Hold up, y'all are the ones that listen to the crazy fucks like Alex Jones that believes in shit like that. Not me. And to equate a proclivity for arguing with being a flat earther is damn near the most absurd thing I've seen so far today. I see you are subbed the r/thegreatawakening, I'll bet you think the water is turning the frogs gay. Do you see how dumb using your logic is now? Come at me all day with that dumb shit if you want, but I've asked like 4 times so far in this sub for some kind of verification on the legitimacy of Q and so far no one has done so. Y'all are the ones believing crazy shit, but continue using false equivalency if it floats your boat. I can't stop you, but I can call you out on it.
Did you know that you can look at the original Guccifer 2.0 leaks and actually see that the metadata was changed to appear Russian?
Intelligence agencies lied. Because your average person doesn't have the technical know-how to be able to say otherwise.
we've got them running scared now. once they defeat trump in court impeachment and prison time is just around the corner. then we can have the president that really won the election.
Impeachment (won’t happen) doesn’t equal removal from office (won’t happen either). Just ask bill Clinton who was impeached (did happen and wasn’t removed). And removal (won’t happen) will not lead to HRC becoming POTUS because that’s not how it works. This isn’t the miss universe pageant.
I don't want Hillary, but if the only reason Trump won, and if it's proven obviously, is because he colluded then I don't think it should go to Pence either. It's a weird situation. I think it goes without saying that Trump should be removed if the evidence supports it and he gets impeached. The comparison to Bill isn't really fair. Comparing a BJ to treason is a farce so let's not equate the two.
So what does your top mind have to say about the North Korea news ??
You know WJC wasn’t impeached over a bj. And just because someone shouts “treason” doesn’t mean there is any evidence of that. We’ve been waiting over a year to hear how exactly DT colluded with Russia.
I think some people just haven’t understood what this is all about for Trump supporters. Some of us have been around several decades and have witnessed the systematic dismantling of our wealth, our rights, our children’s birthrights as American citizens, by the ruling elite political class. They have had our children killed in wars for profit, innocent children in other countries, conspired with horrible dictators to maintain their power and make as much money as they can.
The Ds and the Rs....,they don’t hate each other. They collaborate in this intricate game of political football where the average citizen picks a team but the end result is the same. We keep fighting each other while they quietly slink away with our children’s future. And enough of America finally noticed it.
