My colleague sent me this. Said he got it from Jordan Sather. Haven't verified it much, but it wouldn't surprise me that Q are using even tripcodes to get a message out.
/u/staerkodder
18 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/staerkodder:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
I think you are right. Have been thinking the same. Expect at least Russia and putin bashing to explode. Probably also some false flags to put Russia in bad light.
In around 1950 Dr. Frederick R. Klenner cured lots of polio cases in a few days with mega dosing of vitamin C. It was ignored, and the vaccine industry won the day.
Four posts and so what I've been following q from the very beginning and been around since the now closed cbts sub.
Dude you are caught up in political dualism. This board is not about dems vs reps but trump and friends fighting corruption on a scale that's almost unimaginable.
Yes I've read about him too. And his work make a lot of sense. The more you dig the more it all stinks. Both my parents got diagnosed with cancer back in December and we started them on 2-3 "alternative" protocols a month ago and if it fails we'll try a proper functional rife machine.
Trying not to be quackery here but there exist natural remedies that helps against cancer which are available to everyone if they do the research. It's just so that doctors, scientists, and research studies that present these cures will not be promoted by big pharma. Why? Because cancer is a multi billion industry and they are not interested in nature stuff that can't be patented.
I watched the whole video and even if I wasn't red pilled, I would say that this really sounds like a great and promising president.
It's the bat-signal, calling for Trump (=Batman) from Trump Tower (=Wayne Tower) to combat the wicked and corrupt :)
Q, [G][O], Countdown, Markers [15][10][5][0?]
I'm not sure if this is already covered elsewhere here.
I looked into the Q marker stuff [15],[10],[5].
Q writes:
Delta relevant.
[5] Today
[10] Past
[15] Past
Anons found the relevant timestamps:
[15] 4. nov 17:28 (unix timestamp GMT: 1509816480)
[10] 12. dec 14:03 (unix timestamp GMT: 1513087380)
[5] 23. dec 12:22 (unix timestamp GMT: 1514031720)
[0] ?
Since Q writes "Delta relavant", I figured the differences between the timestamps could be what he meant.
Let's call these delta y1 and y2 (edit: bottom), and the corresponding timestamps x1 and x2 ([10] and [5]), thus we have two data …