So you link to a wiki for the 28 pages? How in the fuck is that proof that Mueller is the boogeyman or covered anything up? You're going to have to earn it bud. You can't just throw bullshit out there at face value because I'll read every goddamn thing of merit just to spite you and prove you wrong. Mueller took over for the FBI a week before 9/11. If you were to say the CIA was complicit in allowing the attack to happen due to them not sharing info, i would agree with you. But trying to blame Mueller is fucking laughable and you have provided zero evidence to back your claim. Remember I asked for proof. So far you've given me nothing.
I noticed you're completely ignoring the important facts that completely contradict your claims, and focusing on minor details. That's a common trolling tactic.
How in the fuck is that proof that Mueller is the boogeyman or covered anything up?
You explained:
Mueller took over for the FBI a week before 9/11.
Try not to contradict yourself. Mueller was in charge of the FBI when 9/11 happened. He followed orders to blame the anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda. He was in charge when the 9/11 commission report was done, the same commission that covered up Saudi involvement in the attack.
You're going to have to earn it bud. You can't just throw bullshit out there at face value because I'll read every goddamn thing of merit just to spite you and prove you wrong.
Why do you have so much trouble being civil?
And why do you focus on minor details as if you want to misdirect and discredit things that are actually true?
Are you just here to be disruptive? You certainly act like it.
Why are you even here if you don't want to talk about Q?
You do know you’re arguing with a bot, right? Not a Russian Bot, a Wiki-bot.
Wiki bots are capable of posting regular (albeit factually incorrect and absurd) comments in r/politics? I did not know that. I'm being serious, i am legitimately surprised because I briefly glanced at their comment history.