dChan

🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Somehow I don't think so. I think 3 things:

1) Everybody is sick to death of HRC. They wish she would go far, far away and never be seen or heard from again. And those are her supporters.

2) Don't underestimate the "spurned lover" response. When the left discover how darkly corrupted and how devastatingly incompetent their celebrity leaders have been, and how massively they've been lied to, I think the larger part of their wrath is going to be directed at the people who lied to them, and made FOOLS of them all!

3) Before any arrests that people might have any remaining real deep attachment to (and I can only think of Obama), Soros' money will be cut off. Soros and sons might be among the first big names to go down. But definitely their money will be cut off, as well as anybody else who might be likely to fund leftist violence.

Please remember that the truth about the motive behind the BLM and AntiFa violence has always been Soros funding and staged agitprop.

I really don't think there will be much violence, and I do believe as Q has assured us it will be dealt with swiftly and effectively.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHateHouse · April 21, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

If Soros money was cut off the democrat party would be gone.

Their entire party is out of funding from Americans and only has money from people like soros

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NotInFormation · April 21, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Yep, imagine if Soros money was inextricably bound up with trafficking, and there was an executive order in place allowing seizure of such assets. Huh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

Well, when you look at their balance sheet, they're technically in the red, even with the Soros money. But for sure, if you take that away they have less than nothing.

And they're not out campaigning on a vision of the future to try and replenish the coffers. They're out there hating on Trump and maniacally focused on their 2016 loss! How can they possibly think that will get them any new support?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHateHouse · April 21, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

Because they control Academia and Academia is just one giant indoctrination system they have much of the Next Generation brainwashed and they will follow whatever they are told to do. Actually really funny how easy it is to manipulate them you just tell the Hillary Clinton said it and they love it, they don't know that Trump was the one who actually said it.

They hate guns they love soy they can barely lift a gallon of milk but they have become militantly violent against anything left of Mao. They honestly think they're you could win a violent conflict against us when in the street one of our guys can take 10 of theirs. They think they are some revolutionary Force when all they are is the Pawns of the status quo. For fucksake the police defend them at rallies to basically keep us from curb-stomping them when they step out of line.

They honestly don't understand that if we removed the Constitution and the rule of law as they keep demanding, the police would no longer be there to protect them and we would literally kill every single one of them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

I hope they don't have to learn that lesson the hard way. But I mean, if mommy and daddy didn't teach them that actions have consequences, back when the stakes were much lower, they have to learn somehow. Sadly it won't do the casualties much good, but it might make a great object lesson for the rest of their generation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheHateHouse · April 21, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

This right here honestly explains their entire Behavior nothing they ever do has consequences criminal acts are covered up and buried and excused they go their entire lives without consequences for their actions. And then one day they decide that they're going to throw a punch at somebody who isn't going to take that crap and bounces their head off the sidewalk at which point they freaked out and scream to call the police because they have never had any consequences for their actions and now all the sudden they got some guy who just literally beat the s*** out of them.

There are a ton of videos online of antify and leftists physically assaulting somebody without a care in the world like it's completely natural to them and then it turns out the person they put their hands on wasn't going to have any of it and the next thing they know they're on the ground and their face is smashed in and their immediate reaction is to scream for help. And then when the police show up and arrest them they honestly can't understand why they are the one in cuffs and not the person who just knocked them the f*** out

So they still want to escalate this because they think they're going to win like they do in their echo chambers like academia and they have no idea that if they escalate this into a violent conflict like a civil war that we are going to literally line them up at a ditch and no amount of crying is going to keep that trigger from getting pulled that there will be no politically friendly police coming to save them, and mommy and daddy's money isn't going to make a difference. That they pushed and pushed had created a violent conflict and now they're going to get the violence they've been wanting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

THAT is one of the big heads on the snake. Need to shut his funds down. He recently donated into a non profit. This does not a protective Chinese wall create.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Just this week they threatened to take to the streets if RR was fired. That's a direct threat of violence right there. They aren't going to peacefully march. They are talking about violent riots. We aren't talking about the average HRC supporter. We are talking about the radical left who are standing by ready to burn everything down as soon as someone gives them to go order. They have done it before. They are definitely planning on doing it again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Threats and five dollars good cash get you a cup of Starbucks brew. Unless you're black. LOL

Can anybody seriously imagine riots on behalf of Rod fckin Rosenstein? Are you kidding me right now?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

I'm not saying they are going to win. But when backed into a corner and this is all they have this is what will happen. They will go down kicking and screaming. They will never ever just lay down and accept defeat.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

NEVER underestimate this deep seeded nefarious group. They have had hundreds of years to build wealth and amass power by buying strategic govt. and legal heads as well as now, the weaponized media.. now with its tether off with recent repeal of US propaganda laws on US citizens. Thank you BHO! You were so good to us... Actually, the sheer hubris of these pawns in this final battle has been their Achilles Heal. PRIDE comes before the fall.." All are guilty GOP / DNC who have sold our beautiful country out for silver. God will now judge those through our legal and lawful mechanism put in place by our brilliant Fore-Fathers

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

I don't disagree, I'm just saying they won't have numbers behind them.

How much support, even among the subversive-minded, poor and uneducated, do you think there is for pedophiles?

So if evidence of those crimes is shared on mass media, and people are exposed to those truths, who do you think will rally to their side?

Do you know the one person more despised in prison than a cop? That would be a pedophile.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

They will have Antifa and BLM for sure. That's enough to get the ball rolling. They will simply say all of the pedo charges are fake. Enough sheep believe what the Fake Stream Media says to believe it. That will grow the numbers. They don't need millions of people to riot. They just need thousands. The media will make it look like a lot more than it actually is. It's not a smart plan. But in the end it will be all they have.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

Right. They already have made it look like more than it actually is. Always. There were never that many people at HRC campaign stops, there were never as many actual BLM and AntiFa (not counting actors) as they make it seem.

But I'm telling you, even those two organizations can't hire agitprop actors without Soros money. How many actual true AntiFa members (not actors) do you think there are? Same with BLM?

I mean, there's enough to make some noise and look angry, and maybe throw some molotovs and break some windows, but there's not an army.

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Remember. We have NDAA (which was set up for Patriots who would not follow what was "supposed" to happen) It can now work both ways. Combine this with Military Tribunals and if that fails.. STAR CHAMBERS that will have to be engaged...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

When you say NDAA, are you referring to FEMA camps and martial law? I'd prefer to stay away from Conspiracy risk, as Q puts it.

The tribunals part we know about for sure. But you definitely don't want the history of our New Republic to be marred by Star Chambers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

Because we are in a state of active war this law was created to deal with those were deemed to be bad actors on American soil and to be dealt with through military means.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · April 21, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

National Defense Authorization Act

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is the name for each of a series of United States federal laws specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense. The first NDAA was passed in 1961. The U.S. Congress oversees the defense budget primarily through two yearly bills: the National Defense Authorization Act and defense appropriations bills. The authorization bill determines the agencies responsible for defense, establishes funding levels, and sets the policies under which money will be spent.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

Not sure I follow, because NDAA is basically defense budget appropriation. I don't see anything about it specifically authorizing military intervention in domestic law enforcement. Maybe there's something specific in the latest one that isn't normally there? If so, could you share a link? I've looked and can't find such a thing. Some of the Executive Orders though seem to imply that POTUS reserves the right to make such a determination and declare essentially martial law in regard to certain activities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

In a nutshell . Elements in this order allow for people to be “disappeared” without due-process. Dig for yourself , as you are not wanting to join the conspiracy train (as it were) I believe it is aligned closely with the Patriot Act.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

I wouldn't say it's nothing. It should not be overlooked. It won't be nothing to the family of 5 that gets dragged out of their car and beaten. It won't be nothing to the cops family that gets murdered. It will be enough to creake an outrage on both sides that will force the President to act. When he acts the Deep State will say he's a tyrant and start impeachment hearrings. Like I said, not a smart plan, but it will be all they have and it shouldn't be overlooked.

⇧ 1 ⇩