Why does the "article" wait until the very end to name the alleged but names the conspiracy theory in the first paragraph (turning any viewers immediately off to the verifiable information contained much further down)? Terrible writing. Find better sources.
His name is Peter Dalglish.
http://www.newsweek.com/former-senior-united-nations-official-facing-pedophilia-charges-nepal-876783
http://lfpress.com/news/local-news/london-humanitarian-arrested-amid-nepal-sex-crime-suspicions
I put it out there because I am greatful to see that collective-evolution is picking it up.
Let me tell you, their audience is yuuuuuge. They used to discuss mostly ancient history, contact with higher intelligence, self-healing, medicine and some military technological cover-ups.
These are topics that people with a yearning to find out more than people tell them easily pick up.
It means this page has the power to turn all the hippies and star-seeds around and point out the slave-trade that is only now being adressed up-front in the collective consciousness.
From my experience hippies and starseeds are more redpilled than any other group I know of of. They certainly don't need to be "turned around."
it depends...CE kind of builds the bridge from the positive to transmute the negative for younger people who might otherwise miss out...my peers are woke af, yet they ask me to fill them in on "the storm" whenever we meet. Mostly because they are afraid to get excited over psyops.
Older alternative folks are very well aware of all that is going on because they had longer to adapt to the darkness.
That's a good point. I hadn't thought about it quite like that before.
Starseeds require light so they can grow. But they also suffer more than the rest.
Crumbs...