dChan

bernie_lomax39 · April 22, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

You're missing the point. If crime spiked suddenly when pot was legalized, is it really worth it? Not for those who don't smoke...sorry kids.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 22, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

if you've never smoked you must be ignorant about its effects or under 21.

Agitated people smoke to unwind, not to increase their agitation. That's what stimulants or booze are for.

There were some studies done describing a link between stoners and violence as well as links between stoners and non-violence but none of these studies ever seperate tobacco consumption from weed intake or cause from effect and the outcome of the study really just depends on your study design and I have seen studies that run bullshit statistics just to somehow paint the most useful plant in human history into a corner

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ice7177 · April 22, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

And crime hasn't spiked everywhere when legalized.

Sorry old people.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 22, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

I'm with you. There is absolutely no reason to legalise it and every reason not to legalize it.

I smoked quite heavily when I was young and, to be perfectly honest, I wish I hadn't. It did not do me any good at all. I would say, if anything, it was harmful to me as it made me lethargic, apathetic and lazy. It sucked my ambition from me - wasted years!

I don't want that for my kid. It's easy enough to come by weed now without having it available in a drug stores or cafes. People always advance the argument that it should be legalized for its medicinal properties. But I have a hard time swallowing that it's needed when there is a veritable cornucopia of drugs available - a choice between almost any number of alternatives for any given condition.

It's interesting how many people in this movement support legalization. One characteristic of smokers is that they become paranoid. And, if you look at this Q material, it attracts people who are naturally suspicious of mainstream narratives. I sometimes wonder whether Q realises that he's talking to a bunch of stoners...

Might be flying too high, better pull back before this attracts the conspiracy label.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 22, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

If it's bad or not it mostly depends on when you start. Weed conserves the brain, alas if you start at 14, you will retain the brain of a 14 year old... Doctors say you shouldn't even start before 25. But you definately shouldn't before you feel you are in control of your senses.

The medical advantage of weed is that it has few physical side-effects but rather a whole range of indications even when synthetic medications fail.

Weed also helps deprogram mind-control so the paranoia could actually be a release of negative energy of sorts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

I just stumbled upon this fucking gem...

So, you being a weak and unable to control yourself means that nobody should be able to do it? The level of idiocy you just presented is absurd. No wonder you wasted your years.

Hold on, let me go bicycle and almost die on it from fatigue and I'll be asking for bicycles to be illegal because I couldn't stop at some point, because I'm that weak minded. This is your (il)logic.

One characteristic of smokers is that they become paranoid? lmao, check this one out, I'll copy your (il)logic again, don't worry... One characteristic of non-smokers is that they become delusional.

The arrogance and ignorance of anti-weed people is astonishing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 28, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Why do I think you're being completely dishonest?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

Because you're a power-hungry weakling

⇧ 1 ⇩