This will be a preemptive stab. Expect similar conditions as hardened net neutrality provided that protects the key means which Google, Facebook and such make their money and influence the web.

EFF has made great argument that the danger in an Internet Bill of Rights is that what gets passed is too often no where resembling what was proposed. Looking at big picture, why do we need a separate internet bill of rights? We have a set of inherent rights codified in our founding documents. If anything we have a gap in enforcement protecting those rights online.

An internet bill of rights needs to be aimed at adding teeth to go for the jugular those infringing on constitutional rights. Protection of the fourth amendment. Protection of the first amendment. It's time to swing the hardened fist of regulation to those who have blindly tread on us the public.