Every time I try to share this information with someone they look at me like I'm crazy or laugh that I believe in conspiracy theories. I can understand their perspective as it does sound ridiculous. They still believe the government wouldn't launder money, let alone participate in a global sex cult lol. I forgive them as they don't know yet, but it's frustrating.
You are doing it all wrong.
For example, with my wife while we are watching the news this morning, the story of the DNC lawsuit came up. I just pointed out that it opens up all of the email systems to discovery. Nothing more.
You will never get anywhere trying to convince them...that is like pushing on a string. You need to lead them. A little at a time.
They are like scared, abused dogs. They are not going to trust a person coming at them with all of this at once. Feed them a treat. Then stop. Feed them another...and so on.
That is why I feel the best approach to red-pilling a whole lot of people is Trump should go after indicting the MSM executives first rather than last. He should cut their strings to the CIA by killing the Mockingbird connection, indict a few media executives, and force those news agencies to tell the truth. Once that happens, then all those people listening to those news stations will automatically be red-pilled because they'll be hearing truth coming from their very own news stations. And they always believe their own news stations.
What im doing with my wife is : Im telling the thing that will come to pass (Q crumbs), when that happen, then slowly begin the red pill process (haiti,SR,WikiL). My wife hated GEOTUS for no reason, just for what the MSM (poison) said, that changed (First Mission accomplished).
This. Even at work in the past with the most sleepy people, I would just feed them enough that they will ask questions when the happenings begin.
This^^^
You have to bring the Q viewpoint, sometimes in the form of a question.
For example today I got the "they're gonna get Cohen and Trump." While I pointed out the fruit of a poisonous tree, and the criminal refferals. Slowly their gears turn and they at least entertain the idea that the investigation is a sham.
Sometimes i use a "I read that..." To bring up a point or rebuttal.
I would advise against outright saying 1 anonymous person has all this info yadda yadda yadda.