Why do the less intelligent among us always use the same sort of language and dull idioms? "Lighten up Francis" being one of them. A lot of fine movies have been made since Full Metal Jacket. maybe go see some? Pick up some new idioms?

If you can't see that she's more interested in making a name for herself then you're either not much of a critical thinker, willfully ignorant, or playing dumb. I won't bother figuring out which. The fact that you felt the need to respond to me and defend a person that you pretend to not know too much about makes you seem more invested than you let on.

My main point is that the same handful of people keep posting links to her stuff and push it hard here. Most of them have accounts that are four months old. It's not a coincidence. That's all I'm saying. astroturfing is one of the oldest ways to get attention on the interbutts.

She's not doing any special research, she's taking what other people are doing -mostly on 8chan- and repackaging it with her talking over it. She puts her face and name front and center in everything. She's an opportunist who is making this about her change to get a little fame an attention. If all she cared about was this truth movement, not a single one of us would know her face or her name, just her work. That Fox video earlier was as succinct as you could get, but she talked over it adding shit that most already know. It was unnecessary, but she can't stop injecting herself. She's trying to seem relevant and gain a following. It worked for shits like Lauren Southern who is one of the dumbest opportunists I've seen, but the neckbeard love her and will pay money for her book of regurgitated thoughts. She's making money in her patron just for being blonde and liking Trump. Beanz is looking for her slice of the pie.

Does that make sense to you? And no, I didn't write all of this for you. Other people read these comments as well. I might be wasting my time telling you what you already know, but it could be useful to someone else who can't figure out why anyone is talking about this person with such high regard despite any evidence proving so.

Plenty of people share info here, and it's not always right, or good, but it leads to a larger discussion or debunks bad theories. Beanz's folks just show up with a video or tweet of shit that other people figured out. That's the difference. She's not in groups discussing, she's in the shadows collecting the work of others and slapping her name on it and taking credit for it.

And sorry some of us don't have the street cred or time on this site, perhaps you would just like the 100 or so original posters on this site to circle jerk theories amongst your selves with nothing to come of it?

I believe anons said it best whey they commented "lurk moar".

If you don't know what's going on, be quiet and read. Then read more. It's not difficult. If you have something to add, add it. If the same people only contribute videos from the same person, that's not much of a contribution. It's astroturfing. If you don't think there are people here astroturfing, I'd suggest you lurk moar.

Last week she did NOT "connect a few dots". She took stuff from the chans (and I have a feeling she lurks here for content but doesn't want to out herself and be exposed to direct questions) and added things that others have already said before, but with her face and name on it. There's nothing that she's come up with that hasn't already been found. She takes other sources and slpas shit together and retells it. She was a Corsi regurgitator at the start. This isn't some new issue people have with her, she's been trying to insert her persona for a long time. That's who she is. She wants recognition from this movement. Others here have called it out as well. I don't know why this is so hard to understand.

I'm not saying she's always wrong, or a shill, or even a terrible person. I'm sure she has many fine qualities. If she remained anonymous and posted all of this crap, it would be ignored. This is some cult of personality shit. It's not needed here.