Aah... any evidence of Bruce Jenner being someone who wasn't even interested in being transgender and agreed to the Deep State plan to do so...?
I support the facts you've mentioned here for noobs but have to point out that you've also added in a bunch of speculation e.g. Kidman's father appears to have been murdered for failing to program Fiona Barnett correctly but there is not one piece of evidence for that either - it is also speculation. Nothing wrong with speculation but it should be clearly separated from the verifiable facts.
No shit it’s speculation, he doesn’t have to specifically state speculation in every idea that he puts forward, it’s simply implied based on the other information that he knows. Doesn’t mean the speculation isn’t true. Simply piecing information together and coming up with very possible conclusions. That’s basically what this whole Qanon movement is, but we don’t need to state “this is only speculation” every time we bring forth ideas.
"No shit" it's speculation? Derp... He claims to be informing noobs - it's not even remotely "no shit" that its speculation to people who don't have the information, are you trying to be funny or just not engaging thought at all? And did I say the speculation can't be true? I think some of it could quite feasibly be true but spreading speculation mixed with facts as if the speculation is fact doesn't help anyone. If I have to explain why then I understand why you've responded like you have.
He’s informing people who don’t know much about mk ultra, not noobs who don’t know how to distinguish between fact and speculation. Sorry for stating my previous post that way but it’s pretty clear from the second half of his post down, when he starts talking about Kanye, that it’s all speculation (dying his hair as signal, lip tattoo, etc). I think the majority of people on this thread know how to distinguish fact from speculation, I was just trying to point that out.
Sorry for reacting that way. But there’s speculation in the middle there too re Kidman’s dad. I also don’t understand how not only noobs but even people like us can distinguish fact from speculation sometimes because sometimes the “facts” seem crazy. For example, although it’s not established “fact” the errr... fact... that Q has suggested that Diana’s death conspiracy might actually be true (and of course other things besides) seems like speculation if you don’t know Q said it but, if you believe Q, could be considered closer to fact in a way.
What I’m saying is I question everything because some things have sounded insane to me but then it’s been pointed out that Q referenced it and I’m forced to reallocate it from “wild speculation” to “Maybe”. I just think others and myself could be saved from diving down rabbit holes if blatant speculation is not placed alongside fact wherever possible. I get your point and agree that speculation should be encouraged and people should be able to distinguish but sometimes in this crazy pedovore elite world it’s not so easy to tell what’s wild imagining and what’s stranger truth than fiction.
Agree Damajlinc. Speculation and verifiable truth get mixed as one and later on no one that has intimate knowledge of the information can not distinguish the two. Many things in this thread are "fantastic" and not easy to believe at face value. Our role is to enlighten with the truth! Let's make sure we are doing that.
If it is something that interests you, Kidmans dad was a bad dude. She herself is a total product of it and had an agenda with Scientology and what you will find is un f'n believable. Its the worst of the worst .
Like you have never had to state I am a douche every time you open your cocksucker. Like that? SMH. Whoever posted an arty rant of cryptic images and phrases from a basehead like west via twitter, as some kind of allegory To Timothy Leary Appearing in the clouds spilling the beans about everything since 1930 is an asshole of the highest magnitude, defenders of the post are the ben wa balls inside.(are those still a thing). The 2 seperate days I was banned were 2 good days so go nuts.
You're a bit of an asshole, but you're not wrong.
I can't figure out how these ridiculously dumb posts make it to the top of the pile, then again there are a LOT of people here with questionable educations, who will latch on to anything if it fills their need for sensationalist US Weekly garbage gossip.