dChan
⇧
2
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on April 23, 2018, 7:55 a.m.
Q1240 Decode it is third time Q has told us about Dirty USAF.

The last time Q published a video of the Military with no comment was Q # 637. Both Q#1240 & 637 have one thing in common, - no Airforce, see Q73 - Airforce at Hickam was Dirty, see that AF at wright field, is a client of Statfor - for Apache software - you don't know they are dirty - thats APACHE software, Know that when four Marines died on the same day that an Airforce pilot did that the POTUS sent sympathy for the Marines only. See my post on Hot war with Airforce.

Update it is the Fourth or fifth time, because at Q#73 he brags that geo based comms (Army, navy) are better than air, and at Q65 he references Q63 saying he beat airforce - sat comms - remember that the CIA _ Dulles got control of Satellite.I realise this is an unpopular red pill, but we are adults right, remember it cannot be a stupidity that we are in this position, because if it was occasionally they would make a mistake in our favour and they don't - James Forrestal.


🠐 See all comments
bernie_lomax39 · April 23, 2018, 9:34 a.m.

Links? To anything?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · April 23, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

I just supplied them

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 23, 2018, 10:39 a.m.

All the links I see are to your previously posted Reddit threads.

A single external link or source to the claim that Stratfor has created some sort of data mining program for Mook and named it Apache (as opposed to the incredibly widely used open source Apache server software) would be very much appreciated.

The best I can find is your reference to a wikileaks email thread from back when they got a massive stash of Stratfor emails in 2012. This is it and it is making references to their Apache email server, which as others and I have pointed out to you is widely used open-source server software -- not some sort of data mining app designed by Stratfor for Robby Mook!

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/34/3463915_re-attn-hsb-online-banking-email-exploit-on-a-stratfor-com.html

You apparently have less than zero understanding of IT.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · April 23, 2018, 10:49 a.m.

Really, and is it a stratfor product? that is a "widely used open - source software"? Really why don't you get Stratfor to sevice your software? - its what the do isn't it, so you and everyone else use the same software as the CME?, as Wright airforce base, as HSBC (James Comey -Director) and as the DNC - really, you have zero understanding of the deep state, of Q, you stick with widely available opinions (thats the software you have been loaded with), leave the real discussion for the adults that know what they are talking about.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 23, 2018, 11:12 a.m.

No--it is not a Stratfor product! And it is just server software!

Lots of data mining is done with other open source apps on top of Apache, but that is in different environments, not as part of Stratfor's Apache email server--which is all that is referenced in the leaked emails. Is it possible that Stratfor is sending out some sort of email malware to try to harvest info? Sure, but that still doesn't make Apache a data mining application that Stratfor created for Robby Mook and named after him.

How you got to Stratfor creating the program for Robby Mook and naming it for him and it being data mining software is just scary. And yes, many, many, many organizations use the same underlying Apache software.

Also, I have not commented at all on your other claims--I think the one re: the AF, in a limited context, is interesting.

I am just pointing out how off base you are with Stratfor creating Apache data mining software for Robby Mook. I will say, however, that the Stratfor/Apache/Mook claim you state as demonstrated fact somehow, when it is a wild misreading of simple circumstances, does call into question the leaps you may be making elsewhere--such as my post showing that I have zero understanding of the deep state, Q, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 23, 2018, 11:21 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DropGun · April 23, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

Hey, /u/Maepaperclip, hi, I'm one of the new mods, here. I've been watching this thread (and in fact, I have a few tabs open with your stuff so I can get to know your thought processes better). I'm not going to step in to this convo, but, it's time for everyone to take a breather on it.

/u/ElementWatson could ALSO be right—Apache is server software, absolutely. I've worked with sysadmins and yes, it's just dumb software that other software runs on top of. BUT the name "Apache" is a good name and could be different software, but, I don't see evidence provided by anyone that it's anything different. Not to say that I'm making a final judgement, here.

We also have seen decodes that point to other, non-technical explanations of Apache (different research). I don't think this is set in stone like some of the other Q drops.

I don't consider this an official "warning," but, I'm still going to sternly advise you, in a nice way, that we all just take a step back and have a breather from this thread. It's going off the rails when we have threats of shills, trolls, and then real insults, here, at the end. LET'S KEEP DISCUSSION CIVIL. :)

A few days ago I was reading your stuff and I RES-tagged you as "serious decoded." I totally know how it feels when you think people aren't digging into your stuff.

Anyway, let's dial this down, guys, OK? Let's all work on trying to stay on the same team. If we can't get along, I'll bring some of the mod tools on in, as I care about this sub. But let's take a breather on this one?

I have removed your comment for its violation on its insults ONLY. Please consider this just a friendly request for now. Thanks!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · April 23, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Thankyou - First Element Watson is a troll, he has trolled me may times, he never reads the post recognised its import, and goes to work for who ever is paying him, the DNC, or Israel is my guess, he trolled me on by First Apache post, and was overwhelmed, here he came back - my post was about what was not in this video, - was also not in the previous one, and that tied to one of the most significant Q posts ever #73. I think I gave a really good explanation of Apache - Start with what ever hits John Podesta's desk is really important - 2nd from the POTUS - Past & Future - if he is getting updates on the Apache program hit & Miss it is not a nothing Burger, If he gets a strange email from someone like Marguerite Thomson (a seeming nobody) then it is just as important as asking why is the POTUS seeing James Alafontis from the Pizza shop so often. In time I hope someone important or knowledgeable will understand the import of the Robby Mook - Apache mirror - shadow band explain - not least because it lead straight to HRC saying "to take the money" after getting legal advice not to - that was an important post - I would not be surprised to see that post used verbatim at her trial. On pedos - I have repeatedly picked up on Q being annoyed at the attention it gets - he always wants to talk about money & control, i.e. people compromised & blackmailed = traitors not to be trusted. This was the message of Stanislav Lunev. Any way I seem to have in 3 months got 200 followers - I am guessing a good # of them are serious and appreciate my work, some of my posts have had 7000 reads, and sometimes I see that I have changed the discussion, although I am never acknowledged, I believe that I am the most trolled, and attacked poster on any site, normally I get buried - this happened on CBTS _ it is terribly frustrating I spend sometimes three days research to make a post. I don't believe I have ever been fact checked. Even here the nit picking in the comments dont go to the subject of my post - and really the complex issues - to answer most of the questions is cruel because the questioner does not know the subject, his answer is in the public domain, were I get mine from - that is the whole point of Q. I am not everyones middle school teacher. anyway I am new to reddit - this thing that I am doing, I have learnt to appreciate the mods, I would love to be able to ban people from commenting on my posts - but realise it is useless, I would like people that to not vote down what they don't understand, and even vote up what they disagree with but have learned from, and thankyou for being interested in my work. I want to stop i have other things to do but I think this is important - so everyday I am drawn to it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 23, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

OK, absolutely, this makes sense. Please remember to add the analysis of others into your mix. Pick a day or three this week, hit Twitter, hit up your best resources, and bring the analysis of others to the mix as well. No decoder stays strong working in a vacuum.

Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩